Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Management //

Encryption

8/15/2018
11:35 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

IETF Makes Transport Layer Security Version 1.3 Official

TLS 1.3 is now the industry standard for secure Internet connections via HTTPS.

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) made version 1.3 of Transport Layer Security official on August 10. This is now the industry standard for secure Internet connections via HTTPS. After heated discussions for the last two years, TLS 1.3 is now finally supported in both the Chrome and Firefox browsers, and in Facebook.

The length of the discussion time for the changes made to the decades-old TLS 1.2 was most likely due to all the members involved trying to avoid problems that would haunt them at a later date. The Heartbleed attack, for example, was a problem in TLS 1.2 that arose from the design choices that went into its creation.

The crypto schemes used in TLS were drawn from what was good in the 90s, but we have learned much since then.

Financial and banking stakeholders are accustomed to being able to monitor TLS 1.2 communications as an anti-fraud measure. The structure of the changes in 1.3 would put an end to that visibility. The financial side advocated for a backdoor to be put into the protocol so that its members could continue such monitoring. In the end, they were outvoted.

Another area of contention was 0-RTT Resumption. This allows two parties that have previously established a TLS handshake to resume a session using older, previously established keys. If attackers got this information in some way they could spoof a connection. However, it was eventually agreed that any attacker would need physical access to a target in order to pull it off. This condition was thought sufficient to assure security, though only the future will truly tell if this conclusion is justified.

Connections will still fall back to TLS 1.2 if one end is not TLS 1.3-capable. But if an attacker attempts to force this kind of fallback, TLS 1.3 will detect it so that appropriate responses can be made.

What advantages will TLS 1.3 give the average user?

First, the kind of encryption to be used in the session is no longer a mishmash of encryption schemes that are potentially crackable due to sketchy implementation. There are only a few crypto choices allowed. The server provides an encryption key, the client provides a session key and, boom, the two go on to converse.

This scenario also means that a client can't trick a server into using an older, less secure means of encryption, which was possible under TLS 1.2. Since the overhead of handshaking needed to establish a connection goes way down, even on initial contact, the time to first display of content is reduced. Therefore, the overall latency of the system (and especially mobile systems) is greatly reduced.

Because there have been multiple intermediate versions of TLS 1.3; IE, Microsoft Edge, Opera and Safari do not yet fully support the protocol. That is sure to change rapidly now that it has been finalized.

HTTPS needed this upgrade to happen. It will only encourage a wider use of secured connections and provide security for the average user.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
NSA Appoints Rob Joyce as Cyber Director
Dark Reading Staff 1/15/2021
Vulnerability Management Has a Data Problem
Tal Morgenstern, Co-Founder & Chief Product Officer, Vulcan Cyber,  1/14/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-20949
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-20
Bleichenbacher's attack on PKCS #1 v1.5 padding for RSA in STM32 cryptographic firmware library software expansion for STM32Cube (UM1924). The vulnerability can allow one to use Bleichenbacher's oracle attack to decrypt an encrypted ciphertext by making successive queries to the server using the vul...
CVE-2020-25683
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-20
A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in dnsmasq when DNSSEC is enabled and before it validates the received DNS entries. A remote attacker, who can create valid DNS replies, could use this flaw to cause an overflow in a heap-allocated memory. T...
CVE-2020-25684
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-20
A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq checks in the forward.c:reply_query() if the reply destination address/port is used by the pending forwarded queries. However, it does not use the address/port to retrieve the exact forwarded query,...
CVE-2020-25685
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-20
A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSS...
CVE-2020-35271
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-20
Employee Performance Evaluation System in PHP/MySQLi with Source Code 1.0 is affected by cross-site scripting (XSS) in the Employees, First Name and Last Name fields.