Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

1/9/2017
03:50 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

DHS Designates Election Systems As Critical Infrastructure

The Department of Homeland Security has deemed the nation's voting system as part of its critical infrastructure, citing security reasons.

The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has designated the nation's election system as part of its critical infrastructure, a status change it has been debating for the past few months.

There are 16 critical infrastructure sectors and 20 subsectors. In a statement issued Jan. 6, DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson explained why the US voting system will become a subsector of the Government Facilities critical infrastructure division.

"Election infrastructure is vital to our national interests, and cyber attacks on this country are becoming more sophisticated, and bad cyber actors -- ranging from nation states, cyber criminals and hacktivists -- are becoming more sophisticated and dangerous," he said.

This infrastructure spans all systems used to manage elections, including storage facilities, polling locations, and voter registration databases. As critical infrastructure, these are eligible for prioritized security assistance from the DHS, if requested.

Further, voting systems will be part of US efforts to improve incident response capabilities, as well as streamlined access to both classified and unclassified information shared by critical infrastructure operators.

Information sharing is a key benefit in this case, says Travis Farral, director of security strategy at Anomali and former elections judge in Texas. The United States' infrastructure for tallying votes is decentralized, which is a "double-edged sword" in terms of security.

"It's harder for someone to attack a single authority," he says, because voting systems are different in each state. "But when trying to dictate security for varying apparatuses, it's difficult for the federal government to protect all that."

The elevation to critical infrastructure will enable local and state election organizations to quickly share information and connect with the DHS to receive updates related to elections, security events, or the geopolitical environment, Farral continues.

It’s a benefit to local municipalities where funding is low and officials want to ensure the integrity of elections. The critical infrastructure designation will give them multiple resources to stay connected and receive a coordinated, streamlined flow of information.

Johnson noted many state and local officials were against the designation, due to concerns about federal takeover of local election processes.

He explained how the designation "does not mean a federal takeover, regulation, oversight or intrusion concerning elections in this country. This designation does nothing to change the role state and local governments have in administering and running elections."

Farral echoes this, noting how the power of election processes still resides with each state. Greater steps would have to be taken in order to change how elections are run.

However, the future is unclear.

"This may not be where things end," he notes, acknowledging the uncertainty of a new president and administration. "It's possible there may be additional changes, or some legislation in Congress designed to make more changes." Individual states may implement their own changes to improve election security, he adds.

This news arrived at a critical time for US cybersecurity. On the same day it was issued, the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a report explaining Russia's role in conducting cyberattacks to interfere with the US election.

This likely wasn’t by chance. "This announcement was probably timed to coincide with the release of the report, but it's hard to say for certain," says Farral.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
How a Manufacturing Firm Recovered from a Devastating Ransomware Attack
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5798
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Lack of correct bounds checking in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5799
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect inheritance of a new document's policy in Content Security Policy in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5800
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Insufficient policy enforcement in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5801
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect eliding of URLs in Omnibox in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5802
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect handling of download origins in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page.