Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
10/13/2016
11:42 AM
Carl Woodward
Carl Woodward
Partner Perspectives
50%
50%

Access, Trust, And The Rise Of Electronic Personal Assistants

App and device makers are working hard to deliver user control over privacy.

“You should leave in five minutes for your next appointment.”

“Traffic is heavy, leave at 11:30 for your flight to San Francisco.”

“Remember to buy bread and eggs.”

All of these reminders are commonplace today, thanks to electronic personal assistants on your phone, tablet, and computer. These aides get information from your emails, calendar entries, location, and other observations about you, your environment, and the immediate context. The more integrated they are with other apps and sources of data, the more effective they can be. But what about your privacy?

A human personal assistant can be the most valuable and trusted person in your life. The ultimate assistant not only knows your preferences, but can anticipate your needs. Like the emerging electronic ones, human assistants read all of your correspondence, know the full details of your calendar, and are privy to most aspects of your business and personal lives. But they have also been a source of gossip and intimate details for centuries. Non-disclosure agreements and lawsuits are still no guarantee of trust or confidentiality, and they cannot un-publish the tell-all book or interview. Trust is developed over time, based on experience and our personal judgment.

Electronic assistants are not really much different. What is different is their level of access and our control over the information and privacy settings. How do you give access and trust to a personal assistant app and its extended ecosystem, especially one whose priorities may be different from yours?

A fun and only slightly futuristic example could be asking your assistant to “Please book a skydiving experience for my anniversary.” In order for the personal assistant to make a good choice, it needs to know:

  • How much money you have in your bank accounts
  • If you have any bills or commitments coming up
  • What your calendar looks like for the suggested date
  • If you have any health issues that would prevent you from participating safely
  • If your partner is likely to think this is a good way to celebrate

Obviously, a security breach when there is this much data involved could be catastrophic.  App and device makers are working hard to deliver user control over privacy. There is a long list of settings available, as well as pop-up approvals for some types of data access. Using this power is an essential part of building a trustworthy relationship.

Next is data sharing among the ecosystem. Unlike your human assistant who is paid by you, your electronic one generates income from multiple sources, including ads, sales commissions, and selling your information to third parties. When you ask for dinner reservations, travel bookings, or other services, are you getting the best deal for you or the optimal deal for the ecosystem of partners? Does your assistant isolate different types of data, or are advertisers able to determine what you are doing, where, and with whom, perhaps to your detriment or embarrassment?

Finally, there is the role of personal assistant as gatekeeper. We are all familiar with human assistants that have controlled access to their principals, unnecessarily influenced information flow, or isolated them from their surroundings. An electronic assistant may be able to do this not only more subtly, but at the direction of ecosystem partners to their benefit.

Carl builds the future with the Office of the CTO's Innovation Pipeline Team in Intel Security. He is a security veteran with five years of top secret UK government experience, five years with his own company Sanctuary Software Limited, and over six years with McAfee/Intel. ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16246
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
Intesync Solismed 3.3sp1 allows Local File Inclusion (LFI), a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-15931. This leads to unauthenticated code execution.
CVE-2019-17358
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
Cacti through 1.2.7 is affected by multiple instances of lib/functions.php unsafe deserialization of user-controlled data to populate arrays. An authenticated attacker could use this to influence object data values and control actions taken by Cacti or potentially cause memory corruption in the PHP ...
CVE-2019-17428
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
An issue was discovered in Intesync Solismed 3.3sp1. An flaw in the encryption implementation exists, allowing for all encrypted data stored within the database to be decrypted.
CVE-2019-18345
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
A reflected XSS issue was discovered in DAViCal through 1.1.8. It echoes the action parameter without encoding. If a user visits an attacker-supplied link, the attacker can view all data the attacked user can view, as well as perform all actions in the name of the user. If the user is an administrat...
CVE-2019-19198
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
The Scoutnet Kalender plugin 1.1.0 for WordPress allows XSS.