Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security //

Data Leakage

// // //
2/7/2018
08:05 AM
Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson
News Analysis-Security Now

Data Breaches Topped 5,200 in 2017, Smashing Records

A look back at 2017 by Risk Based Security finds that there were more than 5,200 data breaches during those 12 months - a new and frightening record.

Last year was a record-setter for the security market, but not in a good way. Over the 12 months of 2017, there were more than 5,200 data breaches recorded around the world -- more than previously seen in any other year, according to a new report.

By the end of 2017, there were 5,207 known data breaches, a 20% increase over the previous high-water mark set in 2015, according to a study conducted by Risk Based Security, a cyberanalystics specialist.

Additionally, more than 7.8 billion personal records leaked in 2017, a 24.2% increase over 2016, when there were 6.3 billion records exposed, according to the report, entitled "2017 Data Breach QuickView Report," which the company released February 6.

In looking back at 2017, Risk Based Security analysts found that data breaches started around the time US workers started to receive W-2 tax forms, and continued nearly unabated until the end of the year.

"We knew things were off to a bad start once the phishing season for W-2 data kicked into high gear," Inga Goddijn, an executive vice president with the company, wrote in the report. "But by the time April 18th came and went, breach disclosures leveled off and we went into summer hopeful the worst was behind us. Unfortunately, that wasn't the case."

Researchers also noticed that the type of data breach that caused the most damaged changed over the course of 2017. While hacking has exposed more personal records over the past eight years compared to any other type of cyber incident, last year more records were exposed through what the study calls "inadvertent online disclosure," where personal or sensitive information is exposed accidentally over the Internet.

While hacking exposed 2.3 billion records last year, the accidental releasing of personal and sensitive information accounted for 5.4 billion of all records exposed during that 12-month period.

Aetna is a prime example.

In August, the records of more than 11,000 patients were exposed. The reason? The insurance company used an outside vendor to mail out letters containing information about patients with HIV. The glassine on the envelopes was large enough to allow anyone to see the information inside -- no great hacking skills were needed.


The fundamentals of network security are being redefined -- don't get left in the dark by a DDoS attack! Join us in Austin from May 14-16 at the fifth-annual Big Communications Event. There's still time to register and communications service providers get in free!

Aetna eventually paid $18.3 million in fines to the New York State Attorney General's Office, as well as court settlements after customers filed lawsuits against the company.

In terms of the types of organizations that sustained the most damage during 2017, the report found that the business sector accounted for 39.4% of all breaches. This was followed by:

  • Medical: 8.1%
  • Government: 7.2%
  • Education: 5.3%

The report also details that companies are bad at detecting breaches. In 2017, there were over 3,900 breaches that were confirmed through a discovery method. Of that number, only 728 were found by the company or organization responsible for the data.

The remaining breaches were found by law enforcement, external fraud detection, customers or unrelated parties, which includes cybercriminals.

"While there is not a direct correlation between discovery method and interest in publicizing breach activity, this data does show that the majority of breaches still go undetected by the compromised organization," according to the report.

Related posts:

— Scott Ferguson, Editor, Enterprise Cloud News. Follow him on Twitter @sferguson_LR.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Machine Learning, AI & Deep Learning Improve Cybersecurity
Machine intelligence is influencing all aspects of cybersecurity. Organizations are implementing AI-based security to analyze event data using ML models that identify attack patterns and increase automation. Before security teams can take advantage of AI and ML tools, they need to know what is possible. This report covers: -How to assess the vendor's AI/ML claims -Defining success criteria for AI/ML implementations -Challenges when implementing AI
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-23463
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-24
Nepxion Discovery is a solution for Spring Cloud. Discover is vulnerable to SpEL Injection in discovery-commons. DiscoveryExpressionResolver’s eval method is evaluating expression with a StandardEvaluationContext, allowing the expression to reach and interact with Java classes suc...
CVE-2022-23464
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-24
Nepxion Discovery is a solution for Spring Cloud. Discovery is vulnerable to a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). RouterResourceImpl uses RestTemplate’s getForEntity to retrieve the contents of a URL containing user-controlled input, potentially resulting in Information...
CVE-2022-23461
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-24
Jodit Editor is a WYSIWYG editor written in pure TypeScript without the use of additional libraries. Jodit Editor is vulnerable to XSS attacks when pasting specially constructed input. This issue has not been fully patched. There are no known workarounds.
CVE-2022-36025
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-24
Besu is a Java-based Ethereum client. In versions newer than 22.1.3 and prior to 22.7.1, Besu is subject to an Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types. An error in 32 bit signed and unsigned types in the calculation of available gas in the CALL operations (including DELEGATECALL) results in incor...
CVE-2022-39240
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-24
MyGraph is a permission management system. Versions prior to 1.0.4 are vulnerable to a storage XSS vulnerability leading to Remote Code Execution. This issue is patched in version 1.0.4. There is no known workaround.