Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security

// // //
9/19/2018
09:35 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb

Data Breach Can Affect Company's Long-Term Stock Price

A recent study by CompariTech finds that data breaches can have some long-term effects when it comes to a company's stock price, but most of the financial damage diminishes over time.

Security teams are all too familiar with how a data breach affects the security posture of an organization. The changes that are made post-breach -- both reactive and pro-active -- can greatly affect how the organization conducts itself.

However, CompariTech is thinking beyond the intra-organizational effects data breaches can have to determine how companies can weather the financial storm following a disclosure of these security incidents.

The review firm has the idea that these breaches will instill doubt in consumers and damage the company's reputation. Not only that, the effects can last for years. This means that a data breach can harm both public sentiment and a company's competitive edge in the market.

Researchers have also wondered wonder if investors would punish companies that leak customer data. These questions are the subject of the 2018 update of the CompariTech analysis, "How Data Breaches Affect Stock Market Share Price," written by Paul Bischoff.

(Source: iStock)
(Source: iStock)

So, what damage can a data breach do?

CompariTech analyzed the closing share prices of 24 companies that were all listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Researchers looked at the company's stock price starting the day prior to the public disclosure of its respective data breach.

Included in the study are many of the largest data breaches in history; all of them resulted in at least 1 million records leaked, and some surpassed 100 million. Some companies were found to be breached more than once, for a total of 28 breaches analyzed.

These companies included: Apple, Adobe, Anthem, Community Health Systems, Dun & Bradstreet, Ebay, Equifax, Experian, Global Payments, Home Depot, Health Net, Heartland Payment Systems, JP Morgan Chase, LinkedIn, Monster, T-Mobile, Sony, Staples, Target, TJ Maxx, Under Armour, Vodafone and Yahoo.

When CompariTech did the first iteration of this analysis in previous years, the firm simply looked at whether the share price went up or down.

The researchers soon realized that this method fails to account for market forces beyond the scope of the study. To control for this, they added a second stage to the analysis.

In this new phase, researchers compared the performance of each stock with the Nasdaq for the same time period and calculated the difference in performance between the two. This means that the research made the Nasdaq's performance the baseline instead of zero as the original research had done.

CompariTech found that 14 market days after a breach, share price would underperform the Nasdaq by -4.6%, but after a month -- about market 22 days -- prices are only down -1.76% against the Nasdaq. After six months, the average share price performance recovers and even surpasses Nasdaq performance, specifically +0.09% verses Nasdaq.

The research also found that breaches can have an overall, long-term negative effect on share price in the long term. After one year, share price has grown 8.53% on average, but will underperform the Nasdaq by -3.7%.

After two years, average share price rose 17.78%, but underperformed the Nasdaq by -11.35%.

Further analysis found additional changes between stocks in each sector, size of data breached and the sensitivity of stolen information.

In the 2018 study, they shifted the focus to six months instead of one to three years of outcome. It found the effect of data breaches on share price diminishes over time, so they chose to look at a shorter period of time when changes in share price are more directly attributable to data breaches.

In comparing this year to last year, the paper noted: "In the 2018 study, we noted a slower decline in performance over time than in 2017. This is most likely to do with the introduction of new companies and breaches in the data set."

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Practical Network Security Approaches for a Multicloud, Hybrid IT World
The report covers areas enterprises should focus on for their multicloud/hybrid cloud security strategy: -increase visibility over the environment -learning cloud-specific skills -relying on established security frameworks -re-architecting the network
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-30333
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-09
RARLAB UnRAR before 6.12 on Linux and UNIX allows directory traversal to write to files during an extract (aka unpack) operation, as demonstrated by creating a ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file. NOTE: WinRAR and Android RAR are unaffected.
CVE-2022-23066
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-09
In Solana rBPF versions 0.2.26 and 0.2.27 are affected by Incorrect Calculation which is caused by improper implementation of sdiv instruction. This can lead to the wrong execution path, resulting in huge loss in specific cases. For example, the result of a sdiv instruction may decide whether to tra...
CVE-2022-28463
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08
ImageMagick 7.1.0-27 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow.
CVE-2022-28470
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08
marcador package in PyPI 0.1 through 0.13 included a code-execution backdoor.
CVE-2022-1620
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08
NULL Pointer Dereference in function vim_regexec_string at regexp.c:2729 in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4901. NULL Pointer Dereference in function vim_regexec_string at regexp.c:2729 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted input.