Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security //

Compliance

2/22/2018
09:35 AM
Dawn Kawamoto
Dawn Kawamoto
Dawn Kawamoto
50%
50%

GDPR Blackmail Looms as a Double-Dip Cyber Attack Plan

Cybercriminals' targeted attacks may also include extortion fees to keep their breaches quiet and out of the view of GDPR enforcers, researchers find.

Companies are scrambling to meet the fast-approaching General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliance enforcement deadline in May and cybercriminals may also be gearing up as well, according to a security report released this week.

Under GDPR, companies that collect personally identifiable information on European citizens face potential penalties of up to 4% of their annual revenues for non-compliance and cybercriminals may take that into consideration when setting their extortion fees, Trend Micro's Paradox of Cyberthreats report notes.

Companies are required to notify GDPR supervisory authorities following a breach. That notification could trigger an investigation into whether the company complied with the regulations and the organization may be subject to potential fines.

It's this sequence of events that may interest cyber attackers.

Cybercriminals are increasingly turning to targeted attacks because they can potentially yield more money than spray-and-pray tactics, the report notes. As a result, it is likely attackers will try to focus on companies based on the potential GDPR fine they might incur for non-compliance after a breach and set a blackmail fee for slightly less than the fine, in exchange for remaining quiet about their breach, according to Trend Micro's February 20 report.

"We have not seen any cases at this time, but are monitoring the ransomware actors closed to identify any new attacks," Jon Clay, director of global threat communications at Trend Micro, told Security Now.

Retail & SMBs stand greatest risk
Online retail stores that service European customers stand the greatest risk of a targeted GDPR-related extortion attack, Clay said.

"Threat actors would be able to identify these businesses fairly easy in their reconnaissance of the organizations' business practices," he notes. "There are many small- to medium-sized online retail vendors. European retail, in general, will likely be targeted as they hold customer data that could be stolen and exploited."

In addition to retailers, Clay says small to midsized organizations will also be likely targets of GDPR-related extortion attacks because they are less familiar with GDPR requirements and the way fines are processed. That means SMBs are likely to pay an extortion fee faster than a large enterprise, which contributes to their appeal as an GDPR-related target, explains Clay.

GDPR blackmail attacks may follow a similar path as ransomware attacks, Clay predicts.

Threat actors will either use a ransomware-like popup that purports the organization has violated GDPR and needs to pay a fine, which would then be routed to the actor's account, or the attacker will steal European customer data from a company and hold that data hostage until a ransom is paid that would be less than a GDPR fine, Clay says.

CEOs may be enticed to pay the blackmail fee versus the higher GDPR fine and undergo the investigation that would precede the fine, notes the report.

Related posts:

— Dawn Kawamoto is an award-winning technology and business journalist, whose work has appeared in CNET's News.com, Dark Reading, TheStreet.com, AOL's DailyFinance, and The Motley Fool.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
7 Tips for Choosing Security Metrics That Matter
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/19/2020
IoT Vulnerability Disclosure Platform Launched
Dark Reading Staff 10/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15270
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
Parse Server (npm package parse-server) broadcasts events to all clients without checking if the session token is valid. This allows clients with expired sessions to still receive subscription objects. It is not possible to create subscription objects with invalid session tokens. The issue is not pa...
CVE-2018-21266
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none.
CVE-2018-21267
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-27673
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 5.9.1, as used with Xen through 4.14.x. Guest OS users can cause a denial of service (host OS hang) via a high rate of events to dom0, aka CID-e99502f76271.
CVE-2020-27674
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x allowing x86 PV guest OS users to gain guest OS privileges by modifying kernel memory contents, because invalidation of TLB entries is mishandled during use of an INVLPG-like attack technique.