Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV //

Malware

4/20/2017
07:47 PM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin
50%
50%

IHG Hack Hit Hospitality Guests in the Wallet

Malware on IHG servers sent credit card info to stay with thieves.

In December 2016, hotel conglomerate IHG announced a data breach that affected credit card transactions in restaurants and shops at approximately a dozen hotels. Last week, the company provided a bit of clarity on the word "approximately": After further investigation, it seems that customers at more than 1,000 hotels might have been hit by credit card theft.

A Danish researcher, Christian Sonne, walked through the list of affected hotels and put the minimum number at 1,175. For customers, though, the issue might be less, "how many hotels" and more, "how will this affect me?"

In a report on the incident, researchers at Kaspersky Labs note that the breach was due to malware on the servers they use to process credit cards. The malware captured "track data" -- information on credit cards' magnetic stripes, including the card number, expiration date and internal verification code.

IHG acknowledged that the breaches were active through at least December 29, 2016, though there's no certainty that the malware was eliminated until the breach was investigated in February and March of this year. The hospitality industry as a whole has been hit hard by breaches of this sort; in a blog post on the subject, security researcher Brian Krebs wrote, "Hotel brands that have acknowledged card breaches over the last year after prompting by KrebsOnSecurity include Kimpton Hotels, Trump Hotels (twice), Hilton, Mandarin Oriental and White Lodging (twice). Card breaches also have hit hospitality chains Starwood Hotels and Hyatt."

Some commentators have criticized IHG for the website on which they list the properties known to have been affected by the breach. The location website asks users to walk through a number of drop-down menus in order to find the hotels in a particular city that were hit by the malware. The listing, while complete, can be cumbersome, especially for business travelers who might have stayed in a number of different properties during the time of the attacks.

In the announcement of the breaches, IHG notes that their new payment system makes the type of attack impossible and assures customers that all malware and traces of the attack have been removed from the IHG systems.

— Curtis Franklin, Security Editor, Light Reading. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/2/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9498
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older may mishandle pointers involved inprocessing data received via RDP static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series ofspecially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possiblyallowing arbitrary code to be executed...
CVE-2020-3282
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack...
CVE-2020-5909
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.
CVE-2020-5910
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the Neural Autonomic Transport System (NATS) messaging services in use by the NGINX Controller do not require any form of authentication, so any successful connection would be authorized.
CVE-2020-5911
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the NGINX Controller installer starts the download of Kubernetes packages from an HTTP URL On Debian/Ubuntu system.