Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint Security

// // //
4/16/2018
08:05 AM
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli

Data Breach Increase Shows Endpoints Are Under Attack

The stats and factoids from the latest edition of Verizon's annual Data Breach Investigation Report make clear enterprise endpoints have been far too vulnerable and that explains why data breaches are on the rise.

Verizon's annual security report on data breaches makes it clear that endpoint attacks are on the rise -- and are perhaps responsible for as many of half of all enterprise data breaches.

On April 10, Verizon released its 2018 Data Breach Investigation Report (DBIR). Now in its 11th annual edition, the latest DBIR from Verizon Business demonstrates that hackers are taking advantage of habitually poor endpoint security.

About 14.5% of more than 2,200 confirmed data breaches across 67 enterprises spanning 65 nations involved remote attacks against point-of-sale (POS) terminals and controllers, while about 5% more occurred through the physical implantation of payment-card skimmers on POS devices, which includes everything from gas-pump terminals to ATMs.

(Source: iStock)
(Source: iStock)

Another 6.5% of breaches stemmed from physically "lost or stolen assets" -- but the DBIR does not distinguish here between endpoint devices as an asset -- laptop or mobile device -- and documents or storage devices as an asset.

And yet web-application attacks against endpoint devices -- without the use of stolen credentials (including, for instance, so-called "drive-by malware") --- however, were the most popular attack vector used in last year's breaches, representing well over 18.5%. Ransomware, in particular, has been particularly prolific -- representing 56% of all malware found. And while ransomware commonly does not so much cause a data breach as it does a data loss, the main takeaway is the same: Organizations' data stores are highly vulnerable to outside attacks against unwitting users' endpoint devices via web apps.

"Malicious stuff is always going on in the Internet so any system you put onto the internet needs to withstand the internet background radiation," DBIR co-author Gabe Bassett told Security Now sister site Light Reading. "Right now, ransomware is a great value proposition -- it is a low investment, you don't have to do a lot of targeting or heavy involvement." (See: Unknown Document 742114.)

Obviously, these numbers go up if a user's credentials have been compromised or if there is an insider-attack element. Other categories of incident patterns, too, include endpoint attacks. DBIR acknowledges that the more than 7.5% of data breaches resulting from cyber-espionage, for instance, to some extent include endpoint-compromising phishing campaigns that install backdoor malware on devices.

More disconcerting is the success rate -- or failure rate, depending upon one's point of view -- of attempts and incidents involving endpoint exploitation. The DBIR reports:

  • Nearly one out of every ten web-application attack incidents succeeded in achieving a data breach.
  • Almost 78% of physical skimmer deployments led to a data breach.
  • Nearly all remote POS attacks (more than 98%) resulted in a data breach.

Conversely, lost and stolen assets rarely -- less than 3.7% of the time -- resulted in a confirmed data breach, although that figure may well rise as time passes.

These statistics, combined with Verizon's own insights on attack-pattern repetition, suggest that these endpoint attacks will continue.

"Hank Williams, Jr., is not the only one who finds old habits hard to break apparently," reads the DBIR. "It appears to be the case for threat actors too, especially if tried-and-true methods continue to yield results."

Alas, the good guys are not breaking their bad endpoint-security habits either, according to the DBIR, including, but not limited to:

  • Exposing endpoints needlessly. ("Many victims could easily become an above-the-median hanging fruit by simply filtering what external IP addresses can reach the remote access mechanism of their POS controller.")
  • Using outdated software versions.
  • Failing to install and use basic anti-malware software.
  • Insufficient anti-phishing training.
  • Lacking multi-factor authentication.
  • Employees leaving their endpoint devices unattended -- particularly in their work areas and in their cars.

At least when it comes to portable endpoint devices, the one bright spot from this year's DBIR is that Verizon maintains, as in years past, that data breaches involving mobile devices remain infrequent (at least, of the types of data breaches that the DBIR covers). Nonetheless, Verizon warns that keeping mobile endpoints secure remains important.

"While some [mobile malware] could be brushed off as 'nuisanceware' or simply a consumer issue, applications with capabilities of capturing and exfiltrating data do exist and organizations need to be mindful of the potential impact of a compromised corporate mobile device," cautions the DBIR. "As mobile devices often provide privileged access to the enterprise environment and hold two-factor authentication credentials, these classes of malware and device-based attacks can result in more damage than adware or click fraud."

As such, the DBIR notes that attackers are increasingly implementing mobile-specific attack strategies to steal data -- and that Verizon is keeping an eye on the space accordingly.

Related posts:

—Joe Stanganelli, principal of Beacon Hill Law, is a Boston-based attorney, corporate-communications and data-privacy consultant, writer, and speaker. Follow him on Twitter at @JoeStanganelli.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Machine Learning, AI & Deep Learning Improve Cybersecurity
Machine intelligence is influencing all aspects of cybersecurity. Organizations are implementing AI-based security to analyze event data using ML models that identify attack patterns and increase automation. Before security teams can take advantage of AI and ML tools, they need to know what is possible. This report covers: -How to assess the vendor's AI/ML claims -Defining success criteria for AI/ML implementations -Challenges when implementing AI
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-40887
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-29
SourceCodester Best Student Result Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection.
CVE-2022-40879
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-29
kkFileView v4.1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the parameter 'errorMsg.'
CVE-2022-29503
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-29
A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the libpthread linuxthreads functionality of uClibC 0.9.33.2 and uClibC-ng 1.0.40. Thread allocation can lead to memory corruption. An attacker can create threads to trigger this vulnerability.
CVE-2022-29504
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-29
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2022. Notes: none.
CVE-2022-40931
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-29
dutchcoders Transfer.sh 1.4.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS).