Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

End of Bibblio RCM includes -->
8/6/2021
11:40 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail

Researchers Call for 'CVE' Approach for Cloud Vulnerabilities

New research suggests isolation among cloud customer accounts may not be a given -- and the researchers behind the findings issue a call to action for cloud security.

BLACK HAT USA 2021 - Las Vegas - A pair of researchers who have been rooting out security flaws and weaknesses in cloud services over the past year revealed here this week new issues that they say break the isolation among different customers' Amazon Web Services (AWS) accounts in the cloud.

Such cross-account cloud service vulnerabilities likely are more widespread than AWS, too, researchers Ami Luttwak and Shir Tamari of cloud security startup Wiz.io said of their findings.

The cross-account flaws suggest a chilling reality for cloud customers: that their cloud instances aren't necessarily isolated from those of the provider's other customers, according to the research. "We showed that it's possible to manipulate services in AWS to access to other services," Tamari said in an interview. That could allow an attacker to read data in another cloud customer's S3 storage bucket, or send and store data from their cloud account to another customer's for nefarious purposes, the researchers demonstrated.

But the three security flaws the researchers found — vulnerabilities in AWS Config, CloudTrail, and AWS Serverless Config that AWS fixed earlier this year — merely reflect a bigger problem with securing cloud services. Luttwak and Tamari say their latest findings underscore the need for a CVE-type repository where cloud providers and researchers can share vulnerability information, and they plan to pursue an industry initiative that does just that.

"We think that cloud vulnerabilities are an industry problem. How do we make sure everybody knows about 'this' vuln? Every day, we're finding these [various] kinds of vulnerabilities" in cloud services, Luttwak told attendees during the pair's presentation this week on the cross-account flaws they found in AWS late last year.

"It's about us as an industry and the need to share that" information, said Luttwak, who has approached the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) with the proposed concept. The industry needs a database that lists cloud vulns, "a 'CVE' system for the cloud," he explained.

That would provide a formal accounting of cloud vulns and include their severity ratings as well as the status of their fixes or patches. "We need to be able to identify vulnerabilities and have good tracking numbers so customers and vendors can track those issues, and have a severity score for fixing those vulnerabilities," Tamari said in an interview.

Luttwak and Tamari's "aha" moment that led to their call to action for a centralized vulnerability tracking system for the cloud came when they found that five months after AWS had fixed the cross-account flaws they reported to the cloud services firm, some 90% of AWS Serverless Repository buckets were still improperly configured. So AWS customers apparently had not applied the new "scoping condition" setting in Serverless Repository, which AWS had alerted customers about via email and the AWS Personal Health Dashboard.

"Most are still using it configured [incorrectly] and with full access" to their S3 storage buckets, Luttwak explained.

AWS sees the researchers' findings differently, however. An AWS spokesperson said that the issues reported by the researchers aren't vulnerabilities but instead configuration choices that some customers use and others prefer not to use.

More Vulns on the Horizon
Tamari noted that cloud security research is still a relatively new discipline, and there's plenty of unknown issues yet to be uncovered. "There are so many new features [for cloud services], and it's very hard to track all the models and updates," he said, and cloud services can easily be misconfigured by an organization.

"The idea [is] that there are so many cloud services vulnerable to cross-connect vulns, we want the community to help search" for them, he said. The hope is that sharing those findings among the security community could help raise awareness among organizations adopting and configuring cloud services.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
//Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
dannoman
dannoman,
User Rank: Strategist
8/11/2021 | 10:48:55 AM
Expand on this by having CVE approach to IoT/IoTM devices
This article got me to thinking about creating an additional approach to Internet of Things (IoT) devices which would include Common Platform Enumerators as well. While numerous vulnerabilities apply to multiple types of endpoints, IoT and IoT Medical (IoTM) devices could have their own device-class specific issues such as weaknesses and vulnerabilities not only in their firmware but also software developed for these class of devices. Its worth thinking about and as I see it MITRE should consider pursuing it.
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The 10 Most Impactful Types of Vulnerabilities for Enterprises Today
Managing system vulnerabilities is one of the old est - and most frustrating - security challenges that enterprise defenders face. Every software application and hardware device ships with intrinsic flaws - flaws that, if critical enough, attackers can exploit from anywhere in the world. It's crucial that defenders take stock of what areas of the tech stack have the most emerging, and critical, vulnerabilities they must manage. It's not just zero day vulnerabilities. Consider that CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog lists vulnerabilitlies in widely used applications that are "actively exploited," and most of them are flaws that were discovered several years ago and have been fixed. There are also emerging vulnerabilities in 5G networks, cloud infrastructure, Edge applications, and firmwares to consider.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2023-1142
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
In Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5, an attacker could use URL decoding to retrieve system files, credentials, and bypass authentication resulting in privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-1143
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
In Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5, an attacker could use Lua scripts, which could allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2023-1144
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5 contains an improper access control vulnerability in which an attacker can use the Device-Gateway service and bypass authorization, which could result in privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-1145
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5 are affected by a deserialization vulnerability targeting the Device-DataCollect service, which could allow deserialization of requests prior to authentication, resulting in remote code execution.
CVE-2023-1655
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository gpac/gpac prior to 2.4.0.