Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

10/28/2013
11:38 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

LinkedIn Defends 'Intro' Email Security

LinkedIn responds to user and security expert concerns about new email feature, cites measures it took to make LinkedIn Intro safe.

LinkedIn: 10 Important Changesr
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
LinkedIn: 10 Important Changes
LinkedIn's newest feature, called Intro, stirred up controversy last week when the professional social network introduced it -- and a few other features -- at an event about its mobile offerings. LinkedIn Intro is an opt-in service that lets you connect on a professional level with people you email every day.

"When people email you, we show you their LinkedIn profile: you can put faces to names, write more effective emails, and establish rapport," LinkedIn said in the announcement. "You can grow your professional network by connecting with them on LinkedIn."

But not everyone was as enthusiastic about it: Security experts were wary, especially in light of LinkedIn's breach last year, which compromised 6.5 million user passwords. To use Intro, users are required to route all emails through LinkedIn's "Intro" servers, which then scan them for certain types of content and temporarily store the passwords to users' external accounts. Security expert Graham Cluley said this sent a shiver down his spine.

[ Learn how to keep your job search private. Read 5 LinkedIn Privacy Settings For Job Hunters. ]

Over the weekend, LinkedIn responded to criticism in a blog post highlighting the measures it took to ensure Intro was safe and secure.

"When the LinkedIn Security team was presented with the core design of Intro, we made sure we built the most secure implementation we believed possible," said Cory Scott, senior manager of information security at LinkedIn. "We explored numerous threat models and constantly challenged each other to consider possible threat scenarios."

LinkedIn described the actions it took prior to Intro's launch. Among them:

-- Isolating Intro in a separate network segment and implementing a security perimeter across trust boundaries;

-- Performing hardening of the external- and internal-facing services and reducing exposure to third-party monitoring services and tracking;

-- Engaging iSEC Partners, a security consultancy, to perform a line-by-line code review of the credential handling and mail parsing/insertion code;

-- Penetration testing the final implementation by LinkedIn's internal team to ensure vulnerabilities were addressed; and

-- Ensuring it had the right monitoring in place to detect potential attacks, react quickly and minimize exposure.

LinkedIn clarified that all communications use SSL/TLS at each point of the email flow between a user's device, LinkedIn Intro and the third-party email system. "When mail flows through LinkedIn Intro, we make sure we never persist the mail contents to our systems in an unencrypted form," Scott said. "And once the user has retrieved the mail, the encrypted content is deleted from our systems."

Scott also addressed rampant concerns from iOS users. "It's important to note that we simply add an email account that communicates with Intro," he said. "The profile also sets up a certificate to communicate with the Intro web endpoint through a web shortcut on the device. We do not change the device's security profile in the manner described in a blog post that was authored by security firm Bishop Fox on Thursday."

LinkedIn's Scott said he and LinkedIn welcome "healthy skepticism and speculation," but LinkedIn felt it was necessary to clarify its practices and correct the misperceptions.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/29/2013 | 3:13:40 AM
re: LinkedIn Defends 'Intro' Email Security
By nature, social computing leans toward sharing and openness. People join LinkedIn to build their circle of connections not to live the most private life possible.
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Deliver a Deadly Counterpunch to Ransomware Attacks: 4 Steps
Mathew Newfield, Chief Information Security Officer at Unisys,  12/10/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19604
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-11
Arbitrary command execution is possible in Git before 2.20.2, 2.21.x before 2.21.1, 2.22.x before 2.22.2, 2.23.x before 2.23.1, and 2.24.x before 2.24.1 because a "git submodule update" operation can run commands found in the .gitmodules file of a malicious repository.
CVE-2019-14861
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the (poorly named) dnsserver RPC pipe provides administrative facilities to modify DNS records and zones. Samba, when acting as an AD DC, stores DNS records in LDAP. In AD, the default permiss...
CVE-2019-14870
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the S4U (MS-SFU) Kerberos delegation model includes a feature allowing for a subset of clients to be opted out of constrained delegation in any way, either S4U2Self or regular Kerberos authent...
CVE-2019-14889
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
A flaw was found with the libssh API function ssh_scp_new() in versions before 0.9.3 and before 0.8.8. When the libssh SCP client connects to a server, the scp command, which includes a user-provided path, is executed on the server-side. In case the library is used in a way where users can influence...
CVE-2019-1484
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows OLE fails to properly validate user input, aka 'Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'.