Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

Bredolab Botnet Still Spewing Malware

Days after Dutch authorities disabled 143 command and control servers, security researchers are seeing new signs of life.

Slideshow: Cloud Security Pros And Cons
Slideshow: Cloud Security Pros And Cons
(click image for larger view and for full slideshow)

Is the Bredolab botnet really dead?

On Monday, Dutch authorities announced that, working in conjunction with hosting provider LeaseWeb, they'd seized -- and crucially, disconnected from the Internet -- 143 command and control (C&C) servers hosting Bredolab in the Netherlands.

Meanwhile on Tuesday, authorities in Armenia arrested a man suspected of being the botnet's mastermind. Since then, according to news reports, Dutch authorities have promised that, as they as they unravel the financial dealings underpinning the botnet, they expect to make further arrests.

But has Bredolab truly been busted? "The glib answer is that we don't know, but let's consider the current situation," said Rik Ferguson, solutions architect for Trend Micro. "Many if not most of the victim machines infected by Bredolab remain infected, [so] the botnet has simply been decapitated."

That decapitation produced a significant decline in botnet-related traffic. Even so, he said, "there is at least one Bredolab C&C server still active and... it is not hosted in the Netherlands, where there is one, there is the potential for more."

Unfortunately, according to Jo Hurcombe and Manoj Venugopalan, malware analysts for Symantec Hosted Services, they began seeing that "Bredolab runs distributing different payloads" the morning after Dutch authorities announced the takedown. By that afternoon, they reported seeing 750 Bredolab-spawned spam emails, more than half of which targeted Spanish users with subject lines riffing on DHL or UPS invoices, as many Bredolab-related attacks do.

According to the Symantec researchers, the emails use fake icons, such as a bogus Microsoft Excel icon, to try and trick the recipient into clicking on the icon. Once executed, the malicious file drops further, hidden files into the system and temp directories, one of which is a downloader that connects to a Bredolab C&C server. Many Bredolab infections also install fake antivirus -- aka scareware -- programs to attempt to get users to pay for bogus software.

Bredolab appears to have taken a big hit. But whether or not it was a death blow remains to be seen. "It is clear from past experience with botnets such as Mega-D and Cutwail that criminal software displays remarkable tenacity and a disturbing ability to rise phoenix-like from the ashes of a concerted take-down attempt," said Trend Micro's Rik Ferguson. "Let's hope that is not the case with Bredolab."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
How an Industry Consortium Can Reinvent Security Solution Testing
Henry Harrison, Co-founder & Chief Technology Officer, Garrison,  5/21/2020
10 iOS Security Tips to Lock Down Your iPhone
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  5/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-4231
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-28
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2.6 could allow an authenticated user to perform unauthorized commands due to hazardous input validation. IBM X-Force ID: 175335.
CVE-2020-4232
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-28
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2.6 could allow an attacker to enumerate usernames to find valid login credentials which could be used to attempt further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 175336.
CVE-2020-4233
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-28
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2.6 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to set the secure flag for the session cookie in SSL mode. By intercepting its transmission within an HTTP session, an attacker could exploit this vulnerabilit...
CVE-2020-4244
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-28
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2.6 could allow an unauthorized user to obtain sensitive information through user enumeration. IBM X-Force ID: 175422.
CVE-2020-4245
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-28
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2.6 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 175423.