Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

3/27/2012
05:43 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Risk And Regulatory Overload

New study finds organizations worried about risk and compliance, but struggling to manage it all

Risk management is a hot topic these days, but it turns out most organizations don't really have much in the way of tools to do it.

According to a new survey by LockPath of 175 compliance and risk practitioners in the U.S., 83.6 percent say the risk level of their organizations ranks as moderate to high, but only about 43 percent have the tools and procedures for managing risk. More than 30 percent run homegrown tools, and 26 percent don't have any tools or procedures to manage risk. Meanwhile, most of these organizations have seen increased regulatory requirements over the past year.

So what gives? "It is crystal clear that, despite what some see as the maturing of risk management programs in the past several years, an alarming number of businesses remain overwhelmed by the number of regulations with which they must comply," said Chris Caldwell, CEO of LockPath, a GRC solutions provider.

Bigger companies see their risk level as higher than smaller ones, the survey found: More than one-fourth of large companies say their risk level is high, versus around 16 percent of midrange-size businesses and 6.5 percent of small to midsize ones. The midrange is ahead when it comes to having established risk and compliance processes, however, with 81.3 percent, followed by large enterprises, with 71.4 percent, and small businesses, 65.4 percent.

Two-thirds of all of the respondents say they don't calculate the costs of compliance efforts.

The healthcare industry appears to be under a lot of stress, although the majority say they do have a risk and compliance process. More than half of the professionals with healthcare organizations say their security risk is high: That's much higher than financial services, with 16.3 percent; utilities, 13.3 percent; and manufacturing, 4.5 percent.

The survey found that the top IT priorities for this year are reducing data breaches and litigation. Also on the list: cutting costs and delivering services more efficiently.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-22861
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-03
An improper access control vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed authenticated users of the instance to gain write access to unauthorized repositories via specifically crafted pull requests and REST API requests. An attacker would need to be able to fork the targeted ...
CVE-2021-22862
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-03
An improper access control vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an authenticated user with the ability to fork a repository to disclose Actions secrets for the parent repository of the fork. This vulnerability existed due to a flaw that allowed the base reference of ...
CVE-2021-22863
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-03
An improper access control vulnerability was identified in the GitHub Enterprise Server GraphQL API that allowed authenticated users of the instance to modify the maintainer collaboration permission of a pull request without proper authorization. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker would b...
CVE-2020-10519
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-03
A remote code execution vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that could be exploited when building a GitHub Pages site. User-controlled configuration of the underlying parsers used by GitHub Pages were not sufficiently restricted and made it possible to execute commands on the Gi...
CVE-2021-21353
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-03
Pug is an npm package which is a high-performance template engine. In pug before version 3.0.1, if a remote attacker was able to control the `pretty` option of the pug compiler, e.g. if you spread a user provided object such as the query parameters of a request into the pug template inputs, it was p...