Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


03:03 PM

Lumension Examines How To Close The Antivirus Protection Gap

New whitepaper examines and compares the effectiveness of standalone AV versus newer technologies

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz., May 16, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- As malware and cyber attacks have become more prevalent and sophisticated, corporate budget constraints have put increased pressure on already limited IT resources. These competing forces have resulted in the adoption of policies that meet bare minimum requirements or involve only singular products, such as Antivirus, selected for their low price points. Lumension®, a global leader in endpoint management and security, today announced the publication of a new whitepaper that examines and compares the effectiveness of standalone AV versus newer technologies, including application whitelisting and a layered approach to endpoint security. The conclusion of the paper is that Antivirus solutions alone are an ineffective and costly security model.

(Photo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20120516/DA07591-INFO)

To conduct this comparison, Lumension worked with an independent malware research organization with expertise in malware attack vectors. Over a seven-day period, more than 2,100 individual samples were collected "in the wild" and directed against configured test systems. The malware test set included trojans, backdoors, PUAs, ransomware, viruses, rootkits and worms - all threat vectors that security professionals are now seeing on a regular basis.

In order to compare AV with more extensive defenses, such as whitelisting, a model of the "Average Corporate Endpoint," ACE, was defined. The ACE was chosen to be representative of a business-oriented end-user comput­er in Operating System, installed applications and "average" IT operational and security practices. A Microsoft® Windows 7 Enterprise (64-bit) machine, part of an Active Directory domain, was chosen as the best representative of an average enterprise desktop endpoint. The ACE test system was then loaded with Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protec­tion 2010 to represent an average third-party AV solution.

The Microsoft Forefront-protected ACE system was then compared against an ACE system running Lumension® Endpoint Management and Security Suite (L.E.M.S.S.), which incorporates application whitelisting, Lumension® Antivirus, Lumension® Application Control and Lumension® Patch Man­agement. Not only did the L.E.M.S.S.-protected system fare significantly better on every account, the failure of the Microsoft Forefront system to repeatedly detect multiple types of malware was even more drastic than anticipated. The results can be seen in the embedded chart, which shows the number of cumulative malware samples missed. A full overview of the results can be found in the whitepaper, Closing the Antivirus Protection Gap, available for free at http://www.lumension.com/Resources/Free-Content/Closing-the-Antivirus-Protection-Gap.aspx?rpLeadsourceID=L2816.

"For years, we've been reiterating the fact that AV by itself is wholly ineffective and this fact continues to ring more true as malware proliferates and grows in complexity daily, said Paul Zimski, Vice President, Solution Marketing, Lumension. "With this whitepaper, we are going beyond simply stating this fact, we are providing proof points in an effort to further convince security professionals that investing in a solution that goes beyond pure AV is critical to the success of their corporate networks in today's increasingly complex and threatening malware landscape."

The whitepaper also examines the dramatic, detrimental impact malware can have on an organization due to loss of private cus­tomer data, corporate intellectual property and reputation. In addition to these dramatic effects, malware can also lead to the loss of employee productivity and increased help desk costs. Because organizations may not always take such costs into account when working to safeguard themselves against malware, Lumension has also developed a True Cost of Malware Calculator to help organi­zations understand these additional costs. The calculator allows for customization of a large number of parameters, which allows a specific model to be developed. This calculator is available for free at http://www.lumension.com/Resources/Value-Calculators/Cost-of-Malware-Calculator.aspx?rpLeadsourceID=L2816.

Tweet This: Just how much of a #FAIL is #AV on its own? Hint: even worse than you may have thought. New study from @_Lumension http://goo.gl/vEbc4

Supporting Resources:

-- Closing the Antivirus Protection Gap Whitepaper -- True Cost of Malware Calculator -- Optimal Security Blog -- Lumension on Twitter -- Lumension on Facebook About Lumension Security, Inc. Lumension Security, Inc., a global leader in endpoint management and security, develops, integrates and markets security software solutions that help businesses protect their vital information and manage critical risk across network and endpoint assets. Lumension enables more than 5,100 customers worldwide to achieve optimal security and IT success by delivering a proven and award-winning solution portfolio that includes Vulnerability Management, Endpoint Protection, Data Protection, Antivirus and Reporting and Compliance offerings. Lumension is known for providing world-class customer support and services 24x7, 365 days a year. Headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, Lumension has operations worldwide, including Virginia, Texas, Utah, Florida, Ireland, Luxembourg, the United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. Lumension: IT Secured. Success Optimized.(TM) More information can be found at www.lumension.com

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
Hirschmann HiOS 07.1.01, 07.1.02, and 08.1.00 through 08.5.xx and HiSecOS 03.3.00 through 03.5.01 allow remote attackers to change the credentials of existing users.
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
An authentication brute-force protection mechanism bypass in telnetd in D-Link Router model DIR-842 firmware version 3.0.2 allows a remote attacker to circumvent the anti-brute-force cool-down delay period via a timing-based side-channel attack
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
Incorrect access control in zam64.sys, zam32.sys in MalwareFox AntiMalware where IOCTL's 0x80002014, 0x80002018 expose unrestricted disk read/write capabilities respectively. A non-privileged process can open a handle to \.\ZemanaAntiMalware, register with the driver using IOCTL 0x8000201...
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
Incorrect access control in zam64.sys, zam32.sys in MalwareFox AntiMalware allows a non-privileged process to open a handle to \.\ZemanaAntiMalware, register itself with the driver by sending IOCTL 0x80002010, allocate executable memory using a flaw in IOCTL 0x80002040, install a hook wit...
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
Intelbras Router RF 301K Firmware 1.1.2 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) due to lack of validation and insecure configurations in inputs and modules.