Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

7/9/2012
03:07 AM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Quick Hits
50%
50%

Lessons Learned From Duqu

The sophisticated Duqu exploit is one of the most complex ever seen. What does it tell you about your enterprise defenses?

[Excerpted from "Lessons Learned From Duqu," a new, free report posted this week on Dark Reading's Advanced Threats Tech Center.]

After Stuxnet hit, security researchers wondered what would come next. It didn't take long before Duqu and then Flame hit, and researchers are once again looking out for the next piece of sophisticated malware with the power to hobble, if not take down, large companies and potentially government infrastructure.

While the average organization may not be the target of Duqu malware, Duqu variants present a real and imminent danger. The stealthy Duqu has been dubbed the "steal everything" virus for its ability to steal just about anything on a computer system. It's important for enterprise IT security professionals to be aware of cyberthreats such as Stuxnet and Duqu, including what entities are developing and waging attacks with them, as well as how the malware has been constructed and what its payload is.

If you’re trying to prevent data leakage in the enterprise, then doesn’t get much worse than Duqu. Most of the experts who have taken the time to decompile and reverse-engineer the Stuxnet binaries agree that the Duqu virus was crafted from the same code base as Stuxnet.

While the intent of the original Duqu virus clearly points to a setup for the next Stuxnetlike attack, Duqu variants have surfaced in the wild and are now a threat to private business. If Duqu were simply your average, run-of-the-mill malware, no one would pay it much attention. Unfortunately, Duqu is much more than that.

In fact, Kaspersky Lab appropriately dubbed Duqu the "steal everything" virus because certain variants contain a vicious payload that includes a remote-access Trojan, a keylogger and a screen-scraping function, among other things.

In many ways, Duqu is the first (that we know of) nation-state-sponsored, James Bond-like digital spy tool. And while your organization may be able to avoid Duqu itself, variants and copycats are real, imminent threats.

What makes Duqu fascinating from an engineering standpoint is the multifaceted way in which it is dropped and installed onto the target PC. The developers of Duqu took advantage of what was at the time a zero-day vulnerability in Microsoft’s Win32 TrueType Font (TTF) parsing engine. This engine is a kernel mode driver, so the vulnerability that was exploited left Duqu’s developers with kernel mode access. The developers behind the attack were able to discover a flaw in the Win32 TTF interpreter that allowed for what was essentially a buffer overrun attack.

To find out more about how Duqu works, and how you can adjust your defenses to protect against copycats, download the free report on the Duqu advanced persistent threat.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add a Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5216
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.9.0, 5.2.0, and 6.3.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a newline could be injected leading to limited header injection. Upon seei...
CVE-2020-5217
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.8.0, 5.1.0, and 6.2.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could b...
CVE-2020-5223
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In PrivateBin versions 1.2.0 before 1.2.2, and 1.3.0 before 1.3.2, a persistent XSS attack is possible. Under certain conditions, a user provided attachment file name can inject HTML leading to a persistent Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The vulnerability has been fixed in PrivateBin v1.3...
CVE-2019-20399
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
A timing vulnerability in the Scalar::check_overflow function in Parity libsecp256k1-rs before 0.3.1 potentially allows an attacker to leak information via a side-channel attack.
CVE-2020-7915
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue was discovered on Eaton 5P 850 devices. The Ubicacion SAI field allows XSS attacks by an administrator.