Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

11/16/2010
05:01 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Issuing Fix For Latest Android Vulnerability Disclosure

Vulnerabilities could let bad guys install apps on the smartphone without user's permission

Google has been issuing updates since last week to its Android platform to fix one of two recently revealed vulnerabilities that could allow an attacker to install applications on a phone without the explicit permission of the smartphone user.

Researchers last week at Black Hat Abu Dhabi and at Intel's annual internal security conference, held in Oregon, separately demonstrated two different vulnerabilities in the Android that each leave the door wide open for an attacker to force a malicious app onto the smartphone, bypassing user permissions prompt.

Jon Oberheide, CTO of Scio Security, along with Zach Lanier, senior consultant at Intrepidus Group, at the Intel conference demonstrated how a vulnerability in the Android platform let them use a phony add-on for a real gaming app to sneak three additional malicious apps onto the phone. "Our proof-of-concept was an app that pretended to be an Angry Birds bonus levels [free app]" in the Android Marketplace, Oberheide says. Then in the background, the researchers also installed a fake toll fraud, fake contact-stealer, and fake location tracker app.

It's Oberheide and Lanier's vulnerability that Google, which pulled the app last week, is now fixing. Google last week also yanked the researchers' phony app from the Android Market. "We've begun rolling out a fix for this issue, which will apply to all Android devices. As always, we advise users to only install applications they trust," a Google spokesperson said.

Meanwhile, the vulnerability demonstrated at Black Hat Abu Dhabi by researcher Nils, head of research for MWR InfoSecurity, is actually in the HTC smartphone's implementation of Android. The flaw was introduced via a setting provided by HTC. Nils says he tried to contact HTC about the flaw, but has not received any response.

Nils' attack worked against an HTC Legend running Android 2.1 and can be waged using a browser exploit. The attack basically updated components of the browser without alerting the user via the user permissions function. Neither Oberheide and Lanier's nor Nils' attacks go after the Linux kernel, but rather the user space of the smartphone.

"In our [PoC], there would be some notification to the user in the top bar showing the app was being installed. You might think that's a negative thing from an attacker's standpoint because it's notifying the user that something is being installed. But in reality ... if the user clicks on it, it will launch the app," Oberheide says.

It has been a rough year for Android security-wise. Researchers have been hammering away at the increasingly popular open-source smartphone platform, and a recent study said Google's popular Android mobile platform kernel contains more than 350 software flaws, one-fourth of which are high-risk for security breaches and system crashes.

But the underlying issue is similar to that of the desktop world, says Kevin Mahaffey, CTO at Lookout Security, a mobile security provider. "This harkens back to the PC world. Vulnerabilities can be introduced in any form at any part of the [software] chain," Mahaffey says. And Android is more at risk of a third-party introducing vulnerabilities at the system level than RIM's BlackBerry or Apple's iPhone, both of which are more under the control of the vendors, he says.

Patching smartphones is not so simple, either, he says. "If there's a long pipeline, the app vendor has to get the patches to acceptable quality ... especially if you have an OS [separate] from the platform device manufacturer," Mahaffey says. "Patching is slower than on a PC."

Meanwhile, Oberheide says his and Lanier's PoC works by getting the Google service to trigger the installation mechanism. "You see a legit app installation request -- the same installation request a legitimate Market app would send to the Google service to trigger this installation mechanism," he says.

He says the Android app market doesn't vet apps enough. Still, most attacks on smartphones thus far have been pretty basic, he says. "There's been the low-hanging fruit of fraud, such as SMS fraud, and a lot of app fraud," Oberheide says. But even the app fraud seen so far is more about making money than stealing information, such as with a phony New York Times app sold for 99 cents that only displays the website to the Times, he notes.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How to Better Secure Your Microsoft 365 Environment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/25/2021
Attackers Leave Stolen Credentials Searchable on Google
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-4682
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-28
IBM MQ 7.5, 8.0, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2 LTS, and 9.2 CD could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by an unsafe deserialization of trusted data. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 186509.
CVE-2020-4888
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-28
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.4.0 to 7.4.2 Patch 1 and 7.3.0 to 7.3.3 Patch 7 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system, caused by insecure deserialization of user-supplied content by the Java deserialization function. By sending a malicious serialized Java object, an attacker co...
CVE-2020-13569
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-28
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in the GACL functionality of OpenEMR 5.0.2 and development version 6.0.0 (commit babec93f600ff1394f91ccd512bcad85832eb6ce). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to the execution of arbitrary requests in the context of the victim. An attacker can...
CVE-2021-20620
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-28
Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Aterm WF800HP firmware Ver1.0.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject an arbitrary script via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2021-20621
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-28
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aterm WG2600HP firmware Ver1.0.2 and earlier, and Aterm WG2600HP2 firmware Ver1.0.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.