Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

2/13/2018
05:20 PM
50%
50%

As Primaries Loom, Election Security Efforts Behind Schedule

While federal agencies lag on vulnerability assessments and security clearance requests, the bipartisan Defending Digital Democracy Project releases three new resources to help state and local election agencies with cybersecurity, incident response.

With primaries for 2018 elections beginning March 6, efforts to harden state, local election systems are being hindered by federal sluggishness and "wariness of federal meddling," the Associated Press reports. 

One of state and local election officials' main complaints, according to the AP report, is their struggle to obtain federal security clearances, which would enable greater information sharing in the event of a security threat or incident. Fewer than half of the officials that have requested federal clearances have yet received them, according to the AP, including the state elections board executive director in Illinois, one of two states where voter registration databases were breached in 2016. 

Another key concern: vulnerability assessments of the state and local election systems. The US Department of Homeland Security offered to conduct these assessments - but only 14 state and three local agencies took DHS up on the offer, and only five of these requested vulnerability assessments have been completed. DHS says all will be completed by mid-April, according to AP.

Election officials did, however receive new guidance Thursday, from the bipartisan group that recently released cybersecurity guidance for election campaign managers. The Defending Digital Democracy Project (D3P) at Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs - co-chaired by the former campaign managers for Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton and the former Defense Department chief of staff during the Obama Administration - published "The State and Local Election Cybersecurity Playbook," "The Election Cyber Incident Communications Coordination Guide," and "The Election Incident Communications Plan Template." 

D3P's recommendations cover paper trails, audit practices, multi-factor authentication, access controls, log management, vendor agreements, end user training, incident response, and communications plans, in addition to details about the specific threats affecting voting systems, from the hardware to registration databases.

For more information, see the Associated Press and D3P.  

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
2/14/2018 | 2:09:25 PM
If you want good security in voting
EACH computerized voting site should be a simple NON INTERNET closed loop network unto itself - nothing outside the building.,  Cables from station to switch to system with a removable hard drive.  When voting done, drive is PHYSICALLY SIGNED FOR AND REMOVED UNDER HUMAN SECURITY to SECURE TRUCK to secure local office where data is UNLOADED and then drive destroyed.  No internet ever.  
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
'BootHole' Vulnerability Exposes Secure Boot Devices to Attack
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/29/2020
Average Cost of a Data Breach: $3.86 Million
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13151
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Aerospike Community Edition 4.9.0.5 allows for unauthenticated submission and execution of user-defined functions (UDFs), written in Lua, as part of a database query. It attempts to restrict code execution by disabling os.execute() calls, but this is insufficient. Anyone with network access can use ...
CVE-2017-18112
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Affected versions of Atlassian Fisheye allow remote attackers to view the HTTP password of a repository via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the logging feature. The affected versions are before version 4.8.3.
CVE-2020-15109
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
In solidus before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2, there is an bility to change order address without triggering address validations. This vulnerability allows a malicious customer to craft request data with parameters that allow changing the address of the current order without changing the shipm...
CVE-2020-16847
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
Extreme Analytics in Extreme Management Center before 8.5.0.169 allows unauthenticated reflected XSS via a parameter in a GET request, aka CFD-4887.
CVE-2020-15135
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
save-server (npm package) before version 1.05 is affected by a CSRF vulnerability, as there is no CSRF mitigation (Tokens etc.). The fix introduced in version version 1.05 unintentionally breaks uploading so version v1.0.7 is the fixed version. This is patched by implementing Double submit. The CSRF...