Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

7/26/2017
04:50 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Adobe's Move to Kill Flash Is Good for Security

In recent years, Flash became one of the buggiest widely used apps out there.

Adobe this week announced plans to finally kill off its Flash media player by the end of 2020, citing obsolescence as one of the primary drivers for its decision. But the reason many want to see the end of the product is security.

For over two decades, Adobe Flash has powered video and interactive content on the Web, especially in areas such as gaming, education, and advertising. But in the past few years, it also became one of the buggiest apps out there.  

Statistics maintained by Mitre show that in 2016 alone a total of 266 vulnerabilities were disclosed in Flash Player, a vast majority of them critical, remotely executable flaws and denial-of-service flaws.

Despite widespread concern over security issues, the number of vulnerabilities in Flash Player actually increased in recent years instead of trending down. In fact, more than half of all vulnerabilities in Flash since 2005 — or 652 vulnerabilities out of 1,030 — were disclosed in just the last three years.

Many of the flaws in Flash have enabled widespread attacks against users running Windows, Chrome, and other platforms. In 2015, Flash accounted for some 17% of all zero-day vulnerabilities discovered that year. Four of the five most exploited zero days in 2015 were in Flash.

Eight of the top 10 security flaws leveraged by exploit kit makers in 2015 were in Flash, according to Recorded Future.

"Flash had the most vulnerabilities of any application — not operating systems — in 2016, and that is after years of Adobe 'fixing' Flash," says John Pescatore, director of emerging security threats at the SANS Institute. So the company's decision to pull the plug on the product is a good one, he says.

"To me, Flash was pretty much just built on a rotted foundation. No amount of added plywood or new shingles was ever going to make it structurally sound or anywhere near safe."

As far back as 2010, Apple's Steve Jobs cited Flash's relative lack of security as one of multiple reasons why Apple would not pre-install the technology on iPhones, iPads, and iPods.

In recent years, all major browser makers — including Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Mozilla — have announced plans to gradually phase out support for the technology. Browsers such as Safari and Microsoft Edge already require users' explicit permission to run the Flash plugin on websites instead of allowing it to run by default. Google has said it will do the same with Chrome soon.

Adobe itself portrayed its decision to end-of-life Flash as being driven by technology trends. In an alert Tuesday, Adobe said technologies such as HTML5, WebGL, and WebAssembly have matured to a point where they have become viable alternatives to Flash for multimedia content on the Web.

Most browser makers have begun integrating capabilities directly into their browsers that were once available only via plugins like Flash. Given this progression, Adobe has decided to terminate support for Flash at the end of 2020, the company said.

Microsoft, Google, and Apple issued simultaneous alerts endorsing the move while reminding users of previously announced plans for phasing out support for Flash in each of their products soon.

Facebook, a platform for which many developers have built Flash-powered games, noted how the evolution of WebGL and HTML5 standards had almost made Flash obsolete, and it urged developers to follow the deadlines set by browser makers. Games built on Flash will continue to run through the end of 2020, but developers should make plans for migrating to other technologies soon, the company noted.

"Adobe Flash has been heavily leveraged in advertising, media, and e-learning spaces," says Mark Butler, CISO of Qualys. "But unfortunately, Adobe has not kept pace with the necessary security updates in order to outweigh the benefits of using the product."

Organizations that rely on Flash should consider moving to HTML5 quickly as it meets the functional needs that Flash previously met. Unlike Flash, HTML5 doesn't require any plugins and allows for seamless inclusion of audio and video files into code, he says. HTML5 is also an open technology that all new browsers have begun to incorporate.

"Security best practice dictates removal or maintaining current patch levels of Adobe's Flash and Java software versions," he said.

Related Content:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
NeilB915
50%
50%
NeilB915,
User Rank: Moderator
9/26/2018 | 3:28:12 AM
Re: Good news indeed
Thnaks for updating this relevant information about Adobe's Move to Kill Flash. As we know that Flash is used by millions of website & the majority of computer in the world have flash installed. Nowadays, Adobe Flash become one of the biggest threats for computer Security. If anyone still having any doubt then i suggest you to contact with Adobe Phone Number to clear your doubt.
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
7/27/2017 | 8:34:57 AM
Good news indeed
Flash is one of the worst doors for malware and cyber-intrusion EVER - that and JAVA.  Getting rid of Flash would be a big benefit going forward, getting Flash OFF the gazillion systems it is installed on is harder.  Now, if we can start coming up with something better than JAVA???
7 Truths About BEC Scams
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  6/13/2019
DNS Firewalls Could Prevent Billions in Losses to Cybercrime
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/13/2019
Cognitive Bias Can Hamper Security Decisions
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/10/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12855
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-16
In words.protocols.jabber.xmlstream in Twisted through 19.2.1, XMPP support did not verify certificates when used with TLS, allowing an attacker to MITM connections.
CVE-2013-7472
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-15
The "Count per Day" plugin before 3.2.6 for WordPress allows XSS via the wp-admin/?page=cpd_metaboxes daytoshow parameter.
CVE-2019-12839
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-15
In OrangeHRM 4.3.1 and before, there is an input validation error within admin/listMailConfiguration (txtSendmailPath parameter) that allows authenticated attackers to achieve arbitrary command execution.
CVE-2019-12840
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-15
In Webmin through 1.910, any user authorized to the "Package Updates" module can execute arbitrary commands with root privileges via the data parameter to update.cgi.
CVE-2019-12835
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-15
formats/xml.cpp in Leanify 0.4.3 allows for a controlled out-of-bounds write in xml_memory_writer::write via characters that require escaping.