Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

2/11/2008
01:57 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Following Bevy Of Patches, The Firefox Browser Is Still Vulnerable

On Friday, Feb. 8, Mozilla released an updated version of its Firefox Web browser that aimed to fix 10 vulnerabilities. Now, at least one security researcher says flaws still remain.

On Friday, Feb. 8, Mozilla released an updated version of its Firefox Web browser that aimed to fix 10 vulnerabilities. Now, at least one security researcher says flaws still remain.The flaws updated on Friday included a nasty bunch, including fixing privilege escalation, cross site scripting vulnerabilities, and remote code execution, among many others.

Then, security researcher Ronald van den Heetkamp, just hours after the release of the updated browser, version 2.0.012, posted an advisory where he detailed a proof-of-concept that explains how the browser still remains at-risk.

The flaw in question, and which was purportedly patched, exists when users have enabled any of Firefox's existing 600 add-ons. When doing so, they become vulnerable, in security jargon, to a directory transversal attack.

In English, that means attackers can take advantage of poorly constructed validation of input file names. The end result is that attackers can gain access to computer files that aren't intended to be accessible by anyone but the user.

In this case, according to van den Heetkamp's analysis, attackers could access all of a user's Firefox preferences, or open "nearly every file stored in the Mozilla programs file directory."

Not good. And this is something that Mozilla needs to rectify quickly.

More information regarding Firefox security is available here, including details on the 10 patches issued on Friday.

For the remaining flaw, van den Heetkamp recommends using a different Web browser until a fix is published, or running a Firefox extension known as NoScript, which is available here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Breaches Are Inevitable, So Embrace the Chaos
Ariel Zeitlin, Chief Technology Officer & Co-Founder, Guardicore,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2011-2916
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
qtnx 0.9 stores non-custom SSH keys in a world-readable configuration file. If a user has a world-readable or world-executable home directory, another local system user could obtain the private key used to connect to remote NX sessions.
CVE-2019-12757
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), prior to 14.2 RU2 & 12.1 RU6 MP10 and Symantec Endpoint Protection Small Business Edition (SEP SBE) prior to 12.1 RU6 MP10d (12.1.7510.7002), may be susceptible to a privilege escalation vulnerability, which is a type of issue whereby an attacker may attempt t...
CVE-2019-12758
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Symantec Endpoint Protection, prior to 14.2 RU2, may be susceptible to an unsigned code execution vulnerability, which may allow an individual to execute code without a resident proper digital signature.
CVE-2019-12759
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager (SEPM) and Symantec Mail Security for MS Exchange (SMSMSE), prior to versions 14.2 RU2 and 7.5.x respectively, may be susceptible to a privilege escalation vulnerability, which is a type of issue whereby an attacker may attempt to compromise the software applicat...
CVE-2019-18372
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Symantec Endpoint Protection, prior to 14.2 RU2, may be susceptible to a privilege escalation vulnerability, which is a type of issue whereby an attacker may attempt to compromise the software application to gain elevated access to resources that are normally protected from an application or user.