Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT/Embedded Security

10/26/2018
08:15 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

IoT Device Adoption Hampered by Consumer's Security Concerns

For companies looking to jump on the IoT bandwagon, the adoption of these devices is being slowed by consumers' concerns over safety and security, a new report finds.

For enterprises and companies looking to cash in on the explosion of Internet of Things devices, it's time to listen to the concerns of your target audience. Consumers are concerned about security and that's slowing adoption.

These are the conclusions of a report conducted by the Cyber Security Research Institute and sponsored by F-Secure. The study, "Pinning Down the IoT," is based on over 19,200 consumer interviews conducted over five years in the US and Europe. Participants included politicians, a senior police officer, cybersecurity specialists, industry analysts, think tank observers and other industry figures involved in developing technology for the IoT.

The stakes for IoT are big, with IDC estimating the market for these connected devices and sensors will increase from $800 billion in 2015 to $1.3 trillion by 2020, with manufacturing, transport and utilities seeing the bulk of that spending.

(Source: iStock)
(Source: iStock)

However, the study notes that there are factors that are holding back IoT adoption. It found that the consumers most eager to purchase new connected devices -- the so-called early adopters -- tend to delay or avoid new IoT purchases due to privacy or security concerns.

The study reports that 80% of US early adopters were worried that new Internet connect devices, such as wearables and connected home appliances, could lead to a violation of their privacy by leaking data. This compares to 63% of UK early adopters and 75% of the French early adopters who express the same concerns.

Security concerns were prevalent as well. Specifically, 66% of UK early adopters were concerned that IoT devices could be affected by malware or that IoT hardware would be hacked.

Some populaces may not be very aware of any direct IoT benefits to them.

A different survey conducted by Transport for London, and quoted in the F-Secure report, found that 66% of city residents didn't see the value in spending money on smart city infrastructure, which is basically IoT applied to practical problems, when compared to other areas where the money could be spent.

Some segments of populace do, however.

In addition, F-Secure cited Silk Road, an analytics company that works with builders, which found was that 84% of older people want to have IoT technology, especially if it means that they can stay in their house longer.

The main reason for adopting IoT is for health monitoring. The second reason was to maintain their independence. The third reason is to starve off loneliness.

In a 2017 survey cited by the report, Gemalto, a Dutch company that manufactures SIM cards for mobile phones, found that 96% of organizations and 90% of consumers report that there is a need for IoT security regulations. Additionally, more than half of those surveyed confirmed owning an IoT device, but only 14% knew how to protect it.

Gemalto also found that 90% of consumers and 86% of businesses report that governments should handle regulation of IoT devices.

As the report states:

The need to secure every device that connects to the internet is clear, but many manufacturers aren't yet acting proactively to make sure all customers can keep their devices updated and safe. As the massive scale of the potential vulnerabilities being built into the IoT becomes impossible to ignore, regulators may have no choice but to act.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-21392
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
Synapse is a Matrix reference homeserver written in python (pypi package matrix-synapse). Matrix is an ecosystem for open federated Instant Messaging and VoIP. In Synapse before version 1.28.0 requests to user provided domains were not restricted to external IP addresses when transitional IPv6 addre...
CVE-2021-21393
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
Synapse is a Matrix reference homeserver written in python (pypi package matrix-synapse). Matrix is an ecosystem for open federated Instant Messaging and VoIP. In Synapse before version 1.28.0 Synapse is missing input validation of some parameters on the endpoints used to confirm third-party identif...
CVE-2021-29429
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
In Gradle before version 7.0, files created with open permissions in the system temporary directory can allow an attacker to access information downloaded by Gradle. Some builds could be vulnerable to a local information disclosure. Remote files accessed through TextResourceFactory are downloaded in...
CVE-2021-21394
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
Synapse is a Matrix reference homeserver written in python (pypi package matrix-synapse). Matrix is an ecosystem for open federated Instant Messaging and VoIP. In Synapse before version 1.28.0 Synapse is missing input validation of some parameters on the endpoints used to confirm third-party identif...
CVE-2021-22497
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
Advanced Authentication versions prior to 6.3 SP4 have a potential broken authentication due to improper session management issue.