Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

File Formats: A Moving Target

Which types of files are most in danger of attack? Experts - and attackers - frequently change their minds

PDF attacks? Please. That's soooo mid-July.

Like teenage fashion, the most favored format for hiding malware seems to be changing on a nearly-weekly basis. And vendors, like IT and security managers, are struggling to keep up.

Just two weeks ago, security vendors were alerting users to a new class of malware, worms, and viruses buried in PDF files sent over email. The PDF file format was an effective disguise for executable code and image-based spam that could escape most antivirus and content-filtering tools, they said. (See Spam Changes Direction, Marshal Warns of New Spam Tactics, and BorderWare Finds New Trend: PDF Image Spam.)

The PDF craze appeared to be "the new image spam," until last week, when McAfee reported an uptick in the use of Excel file formats to carry malware and spam.

"The spam shares the same traits as the PDF spam, so although the filetype is different, this spam is otherwise similar to the previous PDF spam," said McAfee's Nick Kelly in a blog last week. "It's not unlikely that the spammers will try to embed other attachment types, such as Microsoft Word and PowerPoint documents in the future."

While Excel and PDF spam are increasing, GIF and JPG-based image spam concerning the stock market has decreased from about 20 percent of all spam to less than 10 percent, Kelly said.

So first it was images, then it was PDFs, and then it was Excel files. Are we done yet? Not according to a blog issued yesterday by Symantec, and confirmed by McAfee earlier today.

Symantec is warning users of a slow increase in the deployment of malware and other exploits via older file formats such as Zip and RAR. While newer file formats such as Word and Excel are easily or automatically updated, less pervasive programs "are often harder to keep current," Symantec warns.

"A prime example of this is the archive format, with extensions such as .zip, .rar, etc.," Symantec says. "There are a wide number of different programs available for different platforms; more importantly, they have historically been quite vulnerable to exploits." Employees often use differing versions of these older programs, the company says, so an enterprise-wide update can be difficult.

McAfee researcher Pedro Bueno confirmed the RAR trend -- and that file formats have become a moving target -- in his blog earlier today.

"There was a time when we used to receive spam through regular email," Bueno recalls. "Then, the spammers learned about image spam, putting the message on picture files. Recently, we saw that they have moved to PDF spam, and later to encrypted PDF files. A couple of days ago, we noticed spam in Excel files, and now we find another round with a different vector: RAR-compacted archives with spam inside text files! Whatever will we see next?"

Many enterprise security pros are likely wondering the same thing.

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

  • McAfee Inc. (NYSE: MFE)
  • Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT)
  • Symantec Corp. (Nasdaq: SYMC)

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
    Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
    Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
    Tor Weaponized to Steal Bitcoin
    Dark Reading Staff 10/18/2019
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
    This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
    Flash Poll
    2019 Online Malware and Threats
    2019 Online Malware and Threats
    As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2019-18218
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
    cdf_read_property_info in cdf.c in file through 5.37 does not restrict the number of CDF_VECTOR elements, which allows a heap-based buffer overflow (4-byte out-of-bounds write).
    CVE-2019-18217
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
    ProFTPD before 1.3.6b and 1.3.7rc before 1.3.7rc2 allows remote unauthenticated denial-of-service due to incorrect handling of overly long commands because main.c in a child process enters an infinite loop.
    CVE-2019-16862
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
    Reflected XSS in interface/forms/eye_mag/view.php in OpenEMR 5.x before 5.0.2.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of a user's session via the pid parameter.
    CVE-2019-17409
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
    Reflected XSS exists in interface/forms/eye_mag/view.php in OpenEMR 5.x before 5.0.2.1 ia the id parameter.
    CVE-2019-10715
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
    There is Stored XSS in Verodin Director before 3.5.4.0 via input fields of certain tooltips, and on the Tags, Sequences, and Actors pages.