Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

5/28/2010
10:54 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

The Roll Down Hill Effect Of Primary Storage Deduplication

The adoption rate of deduplication in primary storage has been relatively low so far in primary storage. There are concerns on user's minds about performance impact, data integrity and how much capacity savings they will see. Clearly each of these concerns need to be addressed. When it comes to capacity savings though, there is a key component of capacity savings that might get overlooked, the roll down hill effect of proper primary storage deduplication.

The adoption rate of deduplication in primary storage has been relatively low so far in primary storage. There are concerns on user's minds about performance impact, data integrity and how much capacity savings they will see. Clearly each of these concerns need to be addressed. When it comes to capacity savings though, there is a key component of capacity savings that might get overlooked, the roll down hill effect of proper primary storage deduplication.Thus far the big winner in deduplication has been the backup process. If you are doing weekly full backups then there is plenty of opportunity for redundant data and you can post some incredible efficiency gains. This is not the case, or at least should not be, in primary storage. With the exception of virtualization images its unlikely that you will be able to make double digit storage efficiency gains thanks to deduplication alone. If you see typical efficiency claims of 12X in backup deduplication, expect maybe 5X gain in primary storage deduplication.

If you stop there though your missing an important part of the picture, the roll down hill effect of primary storage deduplication. If, and that is an important if, your primary storage deduplication technology can keep the data in an optimized state throughout its entire life cycle then you can see tremendous residual value in primary storage deduplication. With primary storage deduplication snapshots, replication, clones, extra copies of data (just in case copies) all now come at near zero capacity cost. For example you can perform dumps of your database every ten minutes if you want to, deduplication will curtail the capacity growth that would normally create.

The key issue is if and when primary storage deduplication will need to "re-inflate" to a non-optimized data state. Optimization throughout the data lifecycle and the tiers of storage it is on, is critical for making deduplication make sense in primary storage. In fairness there may be a time you want to re-inflate on purpose and remove dependency on the deduplication hash table. That is going to depend on how much you trust your deduplication technology to maintain its meta-data and provide rich data integrity features.

Deduplication technology tries to fix the capacity explosion problem faced by most data centers. Where deduplication is being successful right now, in backup repositories, is trying to fix that problem after it has already occurred. Primary storage deduplication that maintains data in its optimized state fixes the problem before it becomes a problem. If properly implemented primary storage deduplication could have significant reduction on the storage demands of your data center.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
karthickkandaiyah2
50%
50%
karthickkandaiyah2,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/27/2012 | 4:01:16 PM
re: The Roll Down Hill Effect Of Primary Storage Deduplication
good one
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
TPM-Fail: What It Means & What to Do About It
Ari Singer, CTO at TrustPhi,  11/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: -when I told you that our cyber-defense was from another age
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5541
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
VMware Workstation (15.x before 15.5.1) and Fusion (11.x before 11.5.1) contain an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the e1000e virtual network adapter. Successful exploitation of this issue may lead to code execution on the host from the guest or may allow attackers to create a denial-of-service...
CVE-2019-5542
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
VMware Workstation (15.x before 15.5.1) and Fusion (11.x before 11.5.1) contain a denial-of-service vulnerability in the RPC handler. Successful exploitation of this issue may allow attackers with normal user privileges to create a denial-of-service condition on their own VM.
CVE-2010-4660
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Unspecified vulnerability in statusnet through 2010 due to the way addslashes are used in SQL string escapes..
CVE-2011-0529
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Weborf before 0.12.5 is affected by a Denial of Service (DOS) due to malformed fields in HTTP.
CVE-2019-10765
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
iobroker.admin before 3.6.12 allows attacker to include file contents from outside the `/log/file1/` directory.