Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

10/10/2017
02:00 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft Patches Windows Zero-Day Flaws Tied to DNSSEC

Security experts advise 'immediate' patching of critical DNS client vulnerabilities in Windows 8, 10, and other affected systems.

Microsoft today issued patches for three critical vulnerabilities in the Windows DNS client in Windows 8, Windows 10, and Windows Server 2012 and 2016 that ironically came via a security feature.

The heap buffer-overflow flaws discovered by researchers at Bishop Fox – and fixed via the new CVE-2017-11779 security update amid Microsoft's October Patch Tuesday batch - could allow an attacker to wrest away full control of the targeted Windows machine without the victim taking any action at all. The bugs were found specifically in Microsoft's implementation of one of the data record features used in the secure Domain Name System protocol, DNSSEC.

DNSSEC is a security layer for DNS that digitally signs and validates a DNS so it can't be spoofed.

Nick Freeman, the Bishop Fox researcher who discovered the vulnerabilities, says Microsoft's implementation of the NSEC3 (Next Secure Record version 3) feature for DNSSEC is the culprit. It's not surprising to find such a flaw, he says, because whenever a new security technology is added to software, it opens the door for implementation weaknesses. "Microsoft's implementation was poor" due to improper vetting of the format of the DNSSEC messages, says Freeman, who is a senior security associate with Bishop Fox.

"It wouldn't surprise me at all if other [vendors' DNSSEC] implementations" had vulnerabilities as well, he says.

But unbeknownst to Bishop Fox, another researcher, Nelson William Gamazo Sanchez of Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative, also had found and reported the flaws to Microsoft. The software giant credited both Freeman and Sanchez in its security update acknowledgements section.

For an attacker to exploit the DNSSEC vulnerabilities in Windows, he or she would need to be sitting on the same physical network as the targeted machine: that means a malicious insider, or an outsider who sets up a man-in-the-middle attack to intercept DNS requests from the victim's machine. DNS requests can be anything from browsing the Internet, checking email, or even the machine performing its own lookups for software updates.

The attacker could then respond to the Windows DNS requests with malicious data that would elicit the vulnerabilities and corrupt the memory of the DNS client. It then would allow him or her to control the DNS flow, and ultimately gain control of the victim machine. "If someone was using a corporate laptop at a coffee shop and on WiFi, or hacked your cable router and you got hit … giving the attacker an entry point into the [corporate] network," Freeman says. "They could then launch this attack against other systems on that network."

The best protections from such an attack: steer clear of public WiFi or use a VPN while connected to it.

DNS security is typically an afterthought at most organizations, mainly because DNS is a relatively invisible network function behind the scenes that's taken for granted. A recent survey found that three out of 10 companies have been hit with cyberattacks on their DNS infrastructure: and that's only the organizations that actually are aware of these attacks. 

It's been nearly one year since the massive DDoS attack on Domain Name Service (DNS) provider Dyn that disrupted major websites including Amazon, CNN, Netflix, Okta, Pinterest, Reddit, and Twitter.

Bishop Fox researchers, meanwhile, say they haven't seen signs of the Windows DNS flaws being abused by attackers yet. They recommend "immediate" patching of vulnerable Windows machines to protect against such attacks, and released a detailed technical report on the findings. 

"This is a very traditional vulnerability, so it's reasonable" for most attackers to be able to exploit it, Freeman says. 

Related Content:

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
gyufinite
50%
50%
gyufinite,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/10/2017 | 9:55:31 PM
sasa
wow,its so interesting
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
How Security Vendors Can Address the Cybersecurity Talent Shortage
Rob Rashotte, VP of Global Training and Technical Field Enablement at Fortinet,  5/24/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-7068
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7069
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7070
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7071
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2019-7072
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .