Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

9/1/2016
09:00 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Password-Stealing Trojan Now Also Attacks With Cerber Ransomware

Weaponized Microsoft Word Documents spread one-two punch via the infamous Betabot.

An old-school banking Trojan has been reincarnated as a weaponized document payload that first steals passwords and then drops ransomware.

The Betabot Trojan, which the FBI warned about in 2013, is best known as a botnet and for disabling anti-malware software and bypassing virtual machines and sandboxes on victim machines in its quest to steal passwords. But researchers at Invincea have discovered Betabot spreading via rigged documents: after it steals a victim’s browser-stored passwords, it then drops the infamous Cerber ransomware in a second phase of the attack.

Invincea says this is a first: a weaponized document that steals passwords then uses ransomware on its victims.

Patrick Belcher, senior director of threat research at Invincea, says Betabot has infected thousands of victims in this latest iteration. “We haven’t seen Betabot ever do this: doing a phishing run with the same sort of phishing Cerber was using. Instead of using just Cerber, the [attackers] are installing Betabot and then going to Cerber.”

Cerber is a ransomware tool that has caught fire in the cybercrime underground. It uses a ransomware-as-a-service model, which allows nontechnical criminals to deploy it. Cerber affiliates extorted from their victims some $195,000 in July, according to recent data from Check Point, and Cerber’s author nets around $946,000 per year, a hefty income for ransomware operations.

Why the one-two punch? Belcher says it’s all about maximizing potential profit. Once the attackers have stolen the stored passwords, they then hit the victim with Cerber ransomware in order to squeeze as much as they can out of an infected victim.

“They were really after the passwords, I think, or they would not bother to drop Betabot. But they are trying to maximize their profits for each compromised endpoint. They get an amount of value on passwords of the systems … and the second whammy is ‘pay ransom’ on top of that,” he says.

Betabot basically harvests any credentials stored in the browser cache, and in the recent campaign, infects users with a malicious macro in a Word Document posing as a resume. The user only gets infected if macros are enabled in the document either by default or manually.

Bottom line: enterprises continue to be juicy marks for phishing lures. “Our research shows that weaponized documents are six times more prevalent than running into an exploit kit,” Belcher says. Not just malicious macros, but otherwise rigged files as well, he says.

“Every business in America is being run having to open up invoices, resumes, documents, reservations … Phishing campaigns have proven to be extremely accurate in the way they are worded,” for example, he says.

Another perplexing issue, notes Belcher: if users are creating strong passwords and then storing them in their browser cache, their passwords are toast in Betabot-type password-stealing attack.

The best bet to protect against this latest Betabot-Cerber campaign—aside from practicing savvy phishing awareness--is to disable macros altogether and for users to refrain from storing any passwords.

Related Content:

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5216
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.9.0, 5.2.0, and 6.3.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a newline could be injected leading to limited header injection. Upon seei...
CVE-2020-5217
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.8.0, 5.1.0, and 6.2.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could b...
CVE-2020-5223
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In PrivateBin versions 1.2.0 before 1.2.2, and 1.3.0 before 1.3.2, a persistent XSS attack is possible. Under certain conditions, a user provided attachment file name can inject HTML leading to a persistent Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The vulnerability has been fixed in PrivateBin v1.3...
CVE-2019-20399
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
A timing vulnerability in the Scalar::check_overflow function in Parity libsecp256k1-rs before 0.3.1 potentially allows an attacker to leak information via a side-channel attack.
CVE-2020-7915
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue was discovered on Eaton 5P 850 devices. The Ubicacion SAI field allows XSS attacks by an administrator.