Cerber Strikes With Office 365 Zero-Day AttacksCerber Strikes With Office 365 Zero-Day Attacks
Ransomware variant continues its success through chameleon-like reinvention.
June 27, 2016
Variants of Cerber ransomware are pivoting yet again, this time targeting Office 365 email users with a zero-day attack that security experts say likely impacted millions of business users last week. According to a new report from cloud security provider Avanan today, Cerber changed up its attack M.O., shifting gears to utilize a zero-day attack that bypasses Office 365's built-in security tools and hammering Office 365 email users with a phishing campaign.
While Avanan couldn't measure the infection rate, it said that the campaign hit approximately 57 percent of organizations that it services that use Office 365. It said that the attack was detected by customers using Check Point's SandBlast Zero-Day Protection on the Avanan platform, with most traditional antiviruses not detecting the cloud email attack when it was initially found.
“Many users of cloud email programs believe they 'outsourced' everything to Microsoft or Google, including security,” explains Gil Friedrich, CEO of Avanan. “The reality is that hackers first make sure their malware bypasses major cloud email providers' security measures, and so most new malware goes through cloud email programs undetected."
Like many successful ransomware variants, Cerber has maintained its high infection rates through constant reinvention and innovation. First cropping up at the end of February this year, Cerber initially made headway distributed through malvertising that was driven by the Magnituted and Nuclear exploit kits' use of Flash zero-day exploits, according to Trend Micro and FireEye researchers.
By May, Cerber was seen delivered frequently by Dridex in spam campaigns that were seeking to drop the malware via malicious Microsoft Office documents taking advantage of macro vulnerability exploits, according to FireEye. And earlier this month, researchers with Invincea warned that Cerber was utilizing a polymorphic "hash factory" technique to change payloads on the fly as often as every 15 seconds in order to evade signature-based detection.
"When we tried to duplicate the download for this variant, we noticed that the hash we received from the payload delivery server had a different hash than the one in the event above. When we downloaded it a third time, there was yet another hash," wrote Pat Belcher with Invincea about their findings. "Fifteen seconds later, there was another, and then another. In all we downloaded over 40 uniquely hashed Cerber payloads – all with different hashes. It appeared we were dealing with a server-side malware factory."
Among all of the derivations, one unique factor seems to be threaded through all of the Cerber attacks. The ransomware is designed to deliver its ransom demand via a spoken voice note that plays when a victim tries to open a file.
About the Author(s)
Tricks to Boost Your Threat Hunting GameNov 06, 2023
Hacking Your Digital Identity: How Cybercriminals Can and Will Get Around Your Authentication MethodsOct 26, 2023
Modern Supply Chain Security: Integrated, Interconnected, and Context-DrivenNov 06, 2023
How to Combat the Latest Cloud Security ThreatsNov 06, 2023
Reducing Cyber Risk in Enterprise Email Systems: It's Not Just Spam and PhishingNov 01, 2023
Passwords Are Passe: Next Gen Authentication Addresses Today's Threats
How to Deploy Zero Trust for Remote Workforce Security
What Ransomware Groups Look for in Enterprise Victims
Concerns Mount Over Ransomware, Zero-Day Bugs, and AI-Enabled Malware
Securing the Remote Worker: How to Mitigate Off-Site Cyberattacks