Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/20/2009
04:31 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Virtualization Could Collide With PCI, But Help Forensics

Security experts at CSI/SX and Interop warn that PCI-regulated apps and virtualization may not mix right now; say virtualization can help with incident response

LAS VEGAS -- CSI/SX and INTEROP 2009 -- With lingering questions about how virtual environments will play with compliance, security experts here have warned organizations to avoid virtualizing any highly regulated applications -- and to also consider new ways to use virtualization to enhance security.

One big question is whether virtual environments will pass PCI audits. "One of the biggest challenges is that the virtualization vendors have no common taxonomy" for the PCI Council to prescribe the minimum best practices for securing data in virtualized environments, said Michael Legary, executive consultant and founder of Seccuris, a panelist on the Computer Security Institute's Security Exchange summit on virtualization.

And without those best practices, organizations that deploy virtual servers running their PCI data run the risk of failing an audit. Joshua Corman, principal security strategist for IBM ISS, said the best strategy for now is to avoid virtualizing any regulated applications. "Don't do it with highly regulated apps. For the next six months, do hard-core, deep immersion of a low-risk project," Corman said.

PCI DSS 2.2.1 prescribes that you "implement one primary function per server," Corman pointed out, and it all depends on how that is interpreted by an auditor. "A loose interpretation of this says you can virtualize [any PCI-related applications] at all," he said.

Issues such as whether virtualization's ability to dynamically relocate applications when one physical server gets too busy and another has extra capacity also muddies the PCI water. "With dynamic relocation, [apps and databases] might end up comingled," even though they weren't deployed that way to begin with, potentially violating PCI, Corman said.

Corman and other experts here said they expect the PCI standards body to clarify these gray areas eventually, but until then, it's better to be safe than sorry.

"Right now, virtualization is ahead of compliance," he said. "PCI is highly subjective and not specific now...Engage the auditors early...ask [them] how they are going to interpret it" prior to the actual audit, he said.

And while virtualization raises plenty of security risks of its own, it can also serve as a tool for incident response in the wake of an attack: Steve Orrin, director of security solutions at Intel, said here this week that features such as VMware's Record/Replay and Capture can be used in forensics.

You can take a "snapshot" of certain activity and look at it later, rather than shutting down the physical server in the event of a potential breach. It lets you capture potential evidence. "For some apps, you can set it up to copy, record, and play a transaction system," Orrin said. "And if you have that, IT can get back to it without stepping on any evidence."

Virtual machines also let you sandbox suspicious activity, he said. "The bad guys are already using virtual machines for malware analysis," Orrin said. "And in large IT organizations, virtualization could be a tool for analysis...of potential malware."

But using virtualization for forensics isn't easy, he warned. "It's not simple to implement. It requires some infrastructure," he said. "But it can benefit incident response and forensics. People are starting to think about VM capture as evidence."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
MITRE Releases 2019 List of Top 25 Software Weaknesses
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  9/17/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "He's too shy to invite me out face to face!"
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16649
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-21
On Supermicro H11, H12, M11, X9, X10, and X11 products, a combination of encryption and authentication problems in the virtual media service allows capture of BMC credentials and data transferred over virtual media devices. Attackers can use captured credentials to connect virtual USB devices to the...
CVE-2019-16650
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-21
On Supermicro X10 and X11 products, a client's access privileges may be transferred to a different client that later has the same socket file descriptor number. In opportunistic circumstances, an attacker can simply connect to the virtual media service, and then connect virtual USB devices to the se...
CVE-2019-15138
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-20
The html-pdf package 2.2.0 for Node.js has an arbitrary file read vulnerability via an HTML file that uses XMLHttpRequest to access a file:/// URL.
CVE-2019-6145
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-20
Forcepoint VPN Client for Windows versions lower than 6.6.1 have an unquoted search path vulnerability. This enables local privilege escalation to SYSTEM user. By default, only local administrators can write executables to the vulnerable directories. Forcepoint thanks Peleg Hadar of SafeBreach Labs ...
CVE-2019-6649
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-20
F5 BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.6.0-11.6.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.9 and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1 may expose sensitive information and allow the system configuration to be modified when using non-default ConfigSync settings.