Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

7/15/2019
03:00 PM
100%
0%

FTC Reportedly Ready to Sock Facebook with Record $5 Billion Fine

The fine, for the social media giant's role in the Cambridge Analytica scandal, would be the largest ever against a tech company.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Facebook have reached a settlement over the 2015 Cambridge Analytica privacy scandal, according to reports in The Wall Street Journal and other news outlets.

The fine, at approximately $5 billion, is the largest against a tech company in the FTC's history, surpassing the $22.5 million levied against Google in 2012. That fine also was for failures in privacy practices.

While the settlement has not been formally announced, legislators are already speaking out on the subject, with those on both sides of the aisle criticizing the amount – approximately 9% of Facebook's 2018 revenue – as insufficient.

The proposed settlement must be reviewed by the Department of Justice before it's finalized. No date has been announced for the conclusion of that review.

Read more here and here.

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

 

 

 

 

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
CameronRobertson
50%
50%
CameronRobertson,
User Rank: Moderator
7/22/2019 | 4:57:07 AM
Slap on the wrist.
It seems like the amount is great, but considering the kind of money that Facebook makes, and the amount of people that are already reliant on what it does for them, that 5 billion really isn't going to be making a dent in their earnings at all if you ask me! I reckon that it would barely even be considered painful since they could make the money back easily in the coming year with all the acquisitions and development they're doing!
UdyRegan
50%
50%
UdyRegan,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/22/2019 | 3:45:07 AM
No such thing as privacy
In view of this hefty fine amount, how can online users now rest assured that they are truly safe online? Every action that we perform online, there will be at least a single entity that will be watching our every move. Though we do not perform anything illegal, we still feel as though our basic privacy is being invaded. However, there is just too much data online that we need to gain access to so I guess privacy is a small price to pay?
spann182
50%
50%
spann182,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/17/2019 | 4:09:11 PM
Re: Fine Money
California and Colorado have already been looking into this for the states. What we do not need is individual complainces for each state. This should be just the US version of GDPR for ALL states. 

I work in Security and the last think I want to do is remember which states differer in the verbage. 
chadtc
50%
50%
chadtc,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/17/2019 | 2:16:50 PM
Fine Money
What will the FTC do with five billion dollars? Help establish a GDPR for the U.S.? Although GDPR lacks controls it'd be a good start for the US.
drewinutah
50%
50%
drewinutah,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/16/2019 | 2:17:03 PM
FTC fines will herald GDPR Ambulance Chasers!
While this FTC fine of $5 billion "feels" excessive, given the level of scrutiny on both sides of the Pond and because of an increasingly hostile sector of miscreants trying to go where they're not invited, I would expect the GDPR Police to be watching very carefully--especially for a big, fat American-based company, to look to level a big, fat American-sized fine on a GDPR violation--somebody who they know is out in the open and easily pegged as not coloring within the lines (McD? Coke? Pepsico? are you listening?)
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
7/16/2019 | 12:19:18 PM
This is excessive
I do think that facebook will fight this because this is unprecedented. Per the article, Google was fined 12 million but 5 billion is way over the limit.

What they could do, is to allocate that money to improve their security posture over a number of years. But this is extremely excessive.

T
Microsoft Patches Wormable RCE Vulns in Remote Desktop Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/13/2019
The Mainframe Is Seeing a Resurgence. Is Security Keeping Pace?
Ray Overby, Co-Founder & President at Key Resources, Inc.,  8/15/2019
GitHub Named in Capital One Breach Lawsuit
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-15132
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-17
Zabbix through 4.4.0alpha1 allows User Enumeration. With login requests, it is possible to enumerate application usernames based on the variability of server responses (e.g., the "Login name or password is incorrect" and "No permissions for system access" messages, or just blocki...
CVE-2019-15133
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-17
In GIFLIB before 2019-02-16, a malformed GIF file triggers a divide-by-zero exception in the decoder function DGifSlurp in dgif_lib.c if the height field of the ImageSize data structure is equal to zero.
CVE-2019-15134
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-17
RIOT through 2019.07 contains a memory leak in the TCP implementation (gnrc_tcp), allowing an attacker to consume all memory available for network packets and thus effectively stopping all network threads from working. This is related to _receive in sys/net/gnrc/transport_layer/tcp/gnrc_tcp_eventloo...
CVE-2019-14937
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-17
REDCap before 9.3.0 allows time-based SQL injection in the edit calendar event via the cal_id parameter, such as cal_id=55 and sleep(3) to Calendar/calendar_popup_ajax.php. The attacker can obtain a user's login sessionid from the database, and then re-login into REDCap to compromise all data.
CVE-2019-13069
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-17
extenua SilverSHielD 6.x fails to secure its ProgramData folder, leading to a Local Privilege Escalation to SYSTEM. The attacker must replace SilverShield.config.sqlite with a version containing an additional user account, and then use SSH and port forwarding to reach a 127.0.0.1 service.