Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

6/25/2013
01:36 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Duking It Out Over Endpoint Admin Rights

Endpoint rights policies should mean something for elite users, too

No matter how much detection software is in place, how advanced the antimalware technology installed may be, and how much user education is doled out to the masses, at the end of the day, when users retain full control over their endpoints, IT loses a big piece of the endpoint protection puzzle.

"Endpoint security is often at the mercy of the end user because it's possible for an end user to turn it off or reconfigure it incorrectly," says Pierluigi Stella, CTO of Network Box USA. "The IT department needs to set things up very carefully to avoid this. And even then, there are users who still manage to circumvent such measures."

At the root of the circumvention and the lack of control is the great business culture struggle over PC administrator privileges. IT security and operations professionals generally know that revoking admin rights is the right thing to do from both a protection and efficiency standpoint. In fact, according to a survey held last year, 50 percent of IT decision makers said they would expect a decrease in support calls and costs as a direct result of removing admin rights. And, yet, many endpoints within the enterprise remain fully under the control of users because so many line-of-business stakeholders pitch a fit at the whisper of revocation of privileges.

"While organizations are aware of the many benefits of removing admin rights, there's still mounting pressure from employees that demand full privileges," says Mark Austin, CEO of privilege rights management firm Avecto.

[How have attackers managed to 'break' AV with a glut of malware? See 10 Ways Attackers Automate Malware Production.]

The obstructionists come from all quarters, whether it is sales people who say it is difficult to work without administrator rights, traveling executives who worry that they won't be able to fix a problem when they're halfway across the globe from tech support, or the CEO who says she just wants to have the control of administrator rights, says Leonid Shtilman, CEO of Viewfinity, a privilege rights management company.

"It is very difficult to remove administrative rights in this atmosphere of opposition," he says.

But Austin says that organizations "invite infections" on their networks when they provide excessive administrator rights to users. Shtilman agrees, stating that there are many threats out there that depend on users being logged in as administer to execute. Unfortunately, the folks who are most likely to be targeted by attackers and consequently need the greatest protection also tend to be the loudest complainers about retaining administrator rights.

"A huge problem within organizations is senior management and executives demanding they be excluded from such controls," says Ken Pickering, director of engineering for CORE Security. "The irony of this situation is that executives and senior leadership often lack even the most basic knowledge of security threats, so by excluding themselves from controls they actually become the weakest link for compromise within their own organization."

Even at organizations with well-established and enforced endpoint policies, exemptions can add up. If you're playing the odds, and enough endpoints are left open with full privilege, then some of them will eventually be compromised.

"There is a big difference in security between 90 percent of computers without administrator rights and 99 percent," Shtilman says.

Consider an organization with 10,000 endpoints, for instance. If just 10 percent of those machines are left wide open, that leaves a whopping 1,000 machines exposed to much higher risks. Shtilman says that this gap should be closed. Shtilman suggests other organizations take a page from big banks, which have more than 99 percent of machines locked down with standard users rights. He reports how one multinational bank with tens of thousands of machines reports that it has just 20 of them open with full administrator privileges. Austin is of the same mind.

"No user, from desktop users to IT admins, needs an admin account to perform admin tasks." He says. "To give users just enough rights to perform their roles, without compromising security, organizations should follow the concept of least privilege, which grants privileges to applications, not users, therefore empowering employees to be productive."

Companies like Avecto and Viewfinity are trying to make it easier to break through the culture barrier by providing technology that offers more granular control over what users can or can't do compared to the standard binary on-off method offered out-of-the-box on Windows machines. But it'll take more than technology to chalk up a political win among the dissenters.

Shtilman likes to point to one organization he witnessed that navigated the political waters by actually testing tighter controls among a pilot group of some of the biggest obstructionists to pulling endpoint administrator controls: the developers.

"What they did as a first step is they experimented with at least two vendors and installed software on computers of developers who were at the front line of opposition for removal of administrator rights. After a month of tuning the software, they made the most opposed internal customers happy," he says. "This was the best example I have seen for handling it because this group was more difficult to make happy, and they became the biggest evangelists in their organization."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...