Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

2/19/2010
02:32 PM
Wolfgang Kandek
Wolfgang Kandek
Commentary
50%
50%

Boosting Your Defenses Against Botnet Infections

In the past few weeks since the Google/China incident, we have seen a number of interesting blog posts and white papers that provide further details on some of the techniques used by the attackers.

In the past few weeks since the Google/China incident, we have seen a number of interesting blog posts and white papers that provide further details on some of the techniques used by the attackers.

These articles also show the pervasiveness of these type of security incidents. For example, Damballa has published data that shows botnets have hundreds of thousands of members in enterprise networks, and that most enterprise networks have multiple botnets operating within them. Botnets based on "Zeus" are very common, and NetWitness recently published a detailed analysis of one such Zeus based botnet called "Kneber," which has a membership of more than 74,000 PCs -- reaching into more than 2,000 global and 350 U.S.-based entities -- within all commercial and government sectors. Brian Krebs has been covering these botnets for years, first while he was at The Washington Post, and now on his own where he has many excellent examples of the reach and damage of botnets. In November 2009 the Computer Security Group at UCSB published an impressive report on the Torpig botnet, where they managed to take over the command and control server. During the 10 days they were botmaster, they observed 180,000 infected machines sending data.

The malware used in the setup and operation of these botnets changes frequently and is engineered to circumvent the protection provided by the typical antivirus systems. Still there are ways to protect your organization against the most frequent attacks:

  • User awareness: The vast majority of botnet malware counts on user assistance to become entrenched. Make your users aware of the threats, and help them to become conscious of the threats in their interactions on social networks and when downloading and installing software.
  • Software infrastructure: A large part of the malware installs itself by exploiting known vulnerabilities in the operating system and applications installed on the user's computer. Work on keeping your infrastructure consistently updated and keep track of all software installed on users' desktops.
  • Network monitoring: Outbound network monitoring provides the means to track down infected desktops and to take them off the network.

Increasing your efficiencies in these three areas will significantly improve your organization's resilience against the common mass infections techniques many of the major botnet operators are using.

-- As the CTO for Qualys, Wolfgang Kandek is responsible for product direction and all operational aspects of the QualysGuard platform and its infrastructure. Wolfgang has more than 20 years of experience in developing and managing information systems. His focus has been on Unix-based server architectures and application delivery through the Internet. Wolfgang provides the latest commentary on his blog: laws.qualys.com and also publishes his Patch Tuesday commentary to the QualysGuard channel: www.youtube.com/QualysGuard. He is a frequent source in business and trade media and speaks at industry conferences around the world, most recently at RSA 2009.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-20327
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A specific version of the Node.js mongodb-client-encryption module does not perform correct validation of the KMS server’s certificate. This vulnerability in combination with a privileged network position active MITM attack could result in interception of traffic between the Node....
CVE-2021-20328
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Specific versions of the Java driver that support client-side field level encryption (CSFLE) fail to perform correct host name verification on the KMS server’s certificate. This vulnerability in combination with a privileged network position active MITM attack could result in inte...
CVE-2020-27543
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
The restify-paginate package 0.0.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to cause a Denial-of-Service by omitting the HTTP Host header. A Restify-based web service would crash with an uncaught exception.
CVE-2020-23534
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Upgrade.php of gopeak masterlab 2.1.5, via the 'source' parameter.
CVE-2021-27330
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Triconsole Datepicker Calendar <3.77 is affected by cross-site scripting (XSS) in calendar_form.php. Attackers can read authentication cookies that are still active, which can be used to perform further attacks such as reading browser history, directory listings, and file contents.