Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

4/6/2012
03:46 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Big Mac Botnet Mostly Made Up Of U.S. Machines

Major 'wake-up call' for Mac users as Apple OS X Java flaw exploit spreads

It has been confirmed by multiple research houses: There's a massive, 600,000-strong botnet of mainly Apple Macintoshes out there called Flashfake, and most of the infected machines are in the U.S.

A report by researchers at Russian antivirus firm Dr. Web this week of a botnet of 500,000 to 600,000 Macs sent a chill across the Mac user community, which long has been spared the bull's eye of botmasters who traditionally have converted Windows machines into their zombie machines. Security experts have warned that with the Mac's growing popularity -- especially in enterprise circles -- that it was only a matter of time before the Mac would become an attractive target, as well.

"Mac is no longer a safe refuge," says Karim Hijazi, founder and CEO at Unveillance. In the past three hours, Unveillance so far has seen more than 200,000 unique public IPs with hosts infected with the botnet's Flashback Trojan, he says, and it's very likely more than 500,000 machines.

Researchers at Kaspersky Lab also confirmed the mega-Mac botnet today: Kaspersky malware expert Igor Soumenkov says his team found more than 600,000 unique bots reaching out to its server in less than 24 hours, and more than 50 percent were based in the U.S.

This may be the largest Mac botnet ever spotted, experts say, and it's definitely a wake-up call for Mac users to start loading antivirus software and to keep up with their patching regimen.

Dr. Web identified the bots as all Macs. But Kaspersky's Soumenkov says while it's likely that most of the bots are Macs, his team can't confirm that all of the bots that connected to its server were Mac OS X machines. "The bots can be only identified by their unique User-Agent HTTP header, and it does not contain any OS-specific information," he wrote in a blog post today. There were more than 620,000 external IP addresses.

Even so, OS fingerprinting found that more than 98 percent of the network packets received by its server were likely Mac OS X machines. "So, it is very likely that most of the machines running the Flashfake bot are Macs," Soumenkov says.

This particular variant of the Flashback malware family is being deployed for click fraud, according to Kaspersky researchers. It employs an exploit that abuses a just-patched Apple OS X Java flaw to hijack a victim's search engine results, and once they are infected, their machines are used for the click-fraud scam, the company says.

The so-called Trojan BackDoor.Flashback infects users when they are redirected to a malicious website from an infected one after downloading a phony update for Adobe Flash Player. Apple this week patched the flaws that the Trojan is exploiting, but attackers have exploiting similar flaws since February.

"This latest wave of infections is a wake-up call to Mac users that their system is not immune to threats. And the need to follow best security practices, such as remaining current with patches, is ubiquitous -- it doesn't matter if you’re using Windows, Mac, or even mobile phone," says Mike Geide, senior security researcher at Zscaler ThreatLabZ.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18214
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
The Video_Converter app 0.1.0 for Nextcloud allows denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via multiple concurrent conversions because many FFmpeg processes may be running at once. (The workload is not queued for serial execution.)
CVE-2019-18202
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
Information Disclosure is possible on WAGO Series PFC100 and PFC200 devices before FW12 due to improper access control. A remote attacker can check for the existence of paths and file names via crafted HTTP requests.
CVE-2019-18209
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
templates/pad.html in Etherpad-Lite 1.7.5 has XSS when the browser does not encode the path of the URL, as demonstrated by Internet Explorer.
CVE-2019-18198
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
In the Linux kernel before 5.3.4, a reference count usage error in the fib6_rule_suppress() function in the fib6 suppression feature of net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c, when handling the FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF flag, can be exploited by a local attacker to corrupt memory, aka CID-ca7a03c41753.
CVE-2019-18197
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
In xsltCopyText in transform.c in libxslt 1.1.33, a pointer variable isn't reset under certain circumstances. If the relevant memory area happened to be freed and reused in a certain way, a bounds check could fail and memory outside a buffer could be written to, or uninitialized data could be disclo...