Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

6/20/2019
12:30 PM
50%
50%

Small Businesses May Not Be Security's Weak Link

Organizations with 250 or fewer employees often employ a higher percentage of security pros than their larger counterparts.

Small businesses often have a bad reputation for being the gateway to supply-chain attacks on larger enterprises. But this may not be the case, as seen in a new report on small-business security.

As part of (ISC)²'s "Securing the Partner Ecosystem" study, researchers surveyed 700-plus people from small and large organizations to learn views on data-sharing risk. Half of large businesses view third-party partners of all sizes as a security risk, but only 14% have suffered a breach from working with a small partner. Meanwhile, 17% were breached as the result of working with a larger partner.

In fact, 94% of large enterprises are "confident" or "very confident" in small-business partners' security practices, with 95% having a process for vetting security capabilities. Nearly two-thirds of large firms outsource 26% of their daily business tasks to third parties, which requires data sharing. Here, researchers found access management and vulnerability mitigation are often overlooked.

How so? For starters, 34% of large enterprises say they have been surprised by the broad level of access a third-party partner had been given to their networks and data. Nearly 40% of small businesses had been surprised by the access granted when providing services to large partners.

More than half (54%) of small businesses expressed surprise at some large clients' insufficient security practices; 53% have notified clients of vulnerabilities found in larger networks. Fifty-five percent of small businesses said they continued to have access to a client's network or data after a project was completed. What's more concerning, 35% of large organizations admitted when a third party alerted them to insecure data access policies, their practices didn't change.

Read the release here and full report here.  

 

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/21/2019 | 1:49:30 PM
SMB
I think its more akin to SMB's not having the capital to put as much money into security. Not saying the larger corporations that have the capital will but they have the ability to do so. 

I think the assessment is more comparatively rendered and not just a discernment of small businesses on their own.
10 Ways to Keep a Rogue RasPi From Wrecking Your Network
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  7/10/2019
The Security of Cloud Applications
Hillel Solow, CTO and Co-founder, Protego,  7/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-13611
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
An issue was discovered in python-engineio through 3.8.2. There is a Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) vulnerability that allows attackers to make WebSocket connections to a server by using a victim's credentials, because the Origin header is not restricted.
CVE-2019-0234
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-15
A Reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Apache Roller. Roller's Math Comment Authenticator did not property sanitize user input and could be exploited to perform Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The mitigation for this vulnerability is to upgrade to the latest version of ...
CVE-2018-7838
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-15
A CWE-119 Buffer Errors vulnerability exists in Modicon M580 CPU - BMEP582040, all versions before V2.90, and Modicon Ethernet Module BMENOC0301, all versions before V2.16, which could cause denial of service on the FTP service of the controller or the Ethernet BMENOC module when it receives a FTP C...
CVE-2019-6822
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-15
A Use After Free: CWE-416 vulnerability exists in Zelio Soft 2, V5.2 and earlier, which could cause remote code execution when opening a specially crafted Zelio Soft 2 project file.
CVE-2019-6823
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-15
A CWE-94: Code Injection vulnerability exists in ProClima (all versions prior to version 8.0.0) which could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the targeted system in all versions of ProClima prior to version 8.0.0.