Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


11:00 AM
Connect Directly
E-Mail vvv

How Retro Malware Feeds the New Threat Wave

Old-school exploits used in new ways are placing fresh demands for intel-sharing among infosec pros and their time-tested and next-gen security products.

Last year saw a resurgence of the Zeus Trojan, a faded relic (we thought) from 2007. Whereas Zeus’s modus operandi used to be email spam, its more recent incarnation spreads via phishing emails, Facebook links and MMS messages containing the requisite links to infected websites.

McAfee Labs reported on the rise of “retro-malware” last year, noting that the Koobface worm -- nearly dormant by mid-2012 -- had hit a record number of victims on Facebook, Twitter, and other social networking sites in the first quarter of 2013, more than double the previous high-water mark in 2009.

In recent years, information security professionals have focused on preventing drive-by attacks launched by phishing attacks. However, these attacks have mutated into data-entry phishing attacks that don’t require any malware at all in their first phases. Instead, they employ the typical email with a link that takes recipients to Web pages that look legitimate and request a login. Credentials are collected as they are entered and no malware ever enters the system until the login and password are used in a later stage of the attack.

Palo Alto Networks recently released a report showing how old-school exploit techniques are being used in new ways and in new places. The report focused on common network applications such as FTP, RDP, SSL, NetBIOS, and UDP that are being leveraged as gateways or pivot points to communicate directly with endpoints. The company found that UDP has become the command-and-control channel for botnets as a safe place to “hide in plain sight,” with the ZeroAccess botnet showing up with greatest frequency. The ZeroAccess botnet is vintage, but the use of UDP as secret communications bandwidth is newly minted.

Late last, year, RDP “hacks” were in the news, with Brian Krebs reporting that Makost[dot]net rents access to more than 6,000 poorly configured Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP)-enabled servers following a brute-force attack that yielded a huge crop of weak credentials. This was no hack: The logins and passwords were valid, so the authentication system lets whoever purchased those credentials from the bad guys come right in.

Expanding security searchlight
In the case of RDP hacks, because the login and passwords used to gain access to these remote terminals are valid, no alerts were sent; technically there was no “hack.” But at the point of the exfiltration of sensitive data from endpoints, if these organizations had been watching for anomalous activity on those endpoints, an alarm could have been sounded. The same is true of the old ZeroAccess botnet colonizing the UDP layer. Anomalous endpoint behavior is the hallmark of infiltration, and something for which the information security searchlight must now regularly sweep.

Phishlabs’ research division is reporting this month that Vawtrak, a new version of the Gozi Prinimalka Trojan that first reared its ugly head in the mid-2000s, is widening its attack surface and expanding in complexity.

“Advanced Web injects” represent core functionality in this new configuration of the Trojan, which is taking advantage of the disruption of other major botnets such as Shylock and Spy Eye to gain new prominence in the cybercrime market. While financial institutions were the primary target of Vawtrak in the early days, new targets include online retailers, game portals, social networks, and analytics firms in the United States, United Kingdom, Turkey, Slovakia, and Australia.

We all know that cyber criminals and nation states are frighteningly well organized and actively collaborating to take down shared targets in mutually beneficial ways. The best way to add defense-in-breadth to our defense-in-depth techniques is to actively share threat intelligence among ourselves, as professionals, and between our time-tested and next-generation security products.

If we can record “normal” activity over time, regularly monitor that activity, and devote analyst time to proactively study anomalous behavior in all the new places they’re attempting to hide, we have a better shot at catching threats in all their evolutionary stages.

As the Director of the Security Practice for Guidance Software, Anthony Di Bello is responsible for providing in-depth insight into the advanced threat landscape. Since joining the company in 2005, he has been instrumental in defining the company's suite of security products, ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Sara Peters
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
10/6/2014 | 4:34:09 PM
What's old is new
Well cybercrime is rather fashionable these days; why shouldn't it follow the same rules that the fashion/beauty industry does? Do you think that attackers simply wait until we let our guard down, to start using the old stuff we've stopped looking for? The whole "just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water," approach? I'm not entirely certain, though, why that's preferable. I suppose it's cheaper. You don't have to go invest in brand new malware toolkits and such. 
Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
10/7/2014 | 7:54:32 AM
Re: What's old is new
I like your fashion analogy, @Sara. I'm the last person to comment on fashion trends, but to take it the analogy one step further, whenever a retro style comes back into vogue, there seems to always be some new twist that makes your old garb not quite the right look or feel. So it seems with retro malware. It's familiar but yet new enough that existing antimalware and practices won't be effective...
User Rank: Author
10/13/2014 | 4:31:52 PM
Re: What's old is new
As you suggest @Sara, it's always more cost effective to reuse proven code where possible than to create new code from scratch, using new vulnerabilities or obfuscation techniques to successfully inject such code into the enterprise to your point @Marilyn. The folks creating and selling malware are just as organized and budget conscious as their white hat counterparts, looking to leverage methods which offer the greatest return on investment wherever they can.
Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
10/13/2014 | 4:41:37 PM
Re: What's old is new
So true, Anthony. Everyone is looking for the best ROI -- good guys and bad guys alike. 
NSA Appoints Rob Joyce as Cyber Director
Dark Reading Staff 1/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-21
Kubernetes Secrets Store CSI Driver Vault Plugin prior to v0.0.6, Azure Plugin prior to v0.0.10, and GCP Plugin prior to v0.2.0 allow an attacker who can create specially-crafted SecretProviderClass objects to write to arbitrary file paths on the host filesystem, including /var/lib/kubelet/pods.
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-21
Kubernetes Secrets Store CSI Driver versions v0.0.15 and v0.0.16 allow an attacker who can modify a SecretProviderClassPodStatus/Status resource the ability to write content to the host filesystem and sync file contents to Kubernetes Secrets. This includes paths under var/lib/kubelet/pods that conta...
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-21
Kubernetes CSI snapshot-controller prior to v2.1.3 and v3.0.2 could panic when processing a VolumeSnapshot custom resource when: - The VolumeSnapshot referenced a non-existing PersistentVolumeClaim and the VolumeSnapshot did not reference any VolumeSnapshotClass. - The snapshot-controller crashes, ...
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-21
Kubernetes Java client libraries in version 10.0.0 and versions prior to 9.0.1 allow writes to paths outside of the current directory when copying multiple files from a remote pod which sends a maliciously crafted archive. This can potentially overwrite any files on the system of the process executi...
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-21
Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.externalIPs field, to intercept traffic to that IP address. Additionally, an attacker who is able to patch the status (which is considered a privileged operation and should not typicall...