Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

8/27/2015
08:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Consumers Want Password Alternatives

Consumer confidence in online passwords wanes and their password hygiene remains as sketchy as ever, study finds.

Consumers would be very much behind the elimination of passwords from the online environment if retailers, banks and other services could get it together to institute an alternative, according to a new survey out this week.

The study showed that, as things stand, most consumers are not confident in online brands or the efforts they've made so far to supplement password security. And, like many password surveys before it, this one shows once again that part of that mistrust stems from consumers' admitted inability to effectively manage password hygiene for their own accounts.

“Passwords are inherently insecure as a method of authentication, and their efficacy relies on end users, developers, system administrators, and the applications themselves, all of which are vulnerable to a wide variety of attack vectors currently being exploited by cyberattacks around the world," says Geoff Sanders, CEO of LaunchKey, which conducted the survey among 589 respondents.

The report confirms similar numbers from past surveys. For example, 68 percent of respondents reuse passwords across multiple accounts and 77 percent often forget passwords and have to write them down. This comes largely from the volume of login details they must remember. Nearly half of respondents have to manage more than 10 passwords at a time.

In spite of many major brands working on efforts to institute two-factor authentication, nearly two-thirds of consumers are still unfamiliar with these additional authentication methods and only about 20 percent believe they are easy to use, according to the survey.

Another survey out this week by Ponemon Institute shows that growing awareness of two-factor methods have started to up the ante on consumer perception of password security online environments. Looking at what drives consumer confidence in online brands, the study showed that 31 percent of consumers don't trust websites that only rely on passwords to identify and authenticate them.

Tellingly in the LaunchKey survey, 52 percent of survey respondents said they had little to no confidence in online retailers and 76 percent feel their data would be more secure with an alternative form of verification. Just over half of them support the idea of getting rid of passwords altogether. Approximately 59 percent of respondents say they'd prefer using fingerprint scans over passwords.

"The future of authentication is free from traditional passwords,” Sanders said. “We must remove the vulnerability and liability that passwords have created while implementing more secure authentication methods that account for an evolving and diversified landscape of use cases, end users and threats.”

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
sillieabbe
50%
50%
sillieabbe,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/7/2015 | 4:04:50 AM
A passwordless world would bring a nightmare.
In a world where we live without remembered passwords, say, where our identity is established without our volitional participation, we would be able to have a safe sleep only when we are alone in a firmly locked room. Is this what we want?
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11844
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
CVE-2020-6937
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
CVE-2020-7648
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
CVE-2020-7650
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
CVE-2020-7654
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.