Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security

// // //
1/3/2018
08:55 AM
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall

Cyber Insurance Builds for Business

Insurance for cyber issues is growing to take its place with property, casualty and business continuity insurance for the enterprise.

If a data center is flooded by rain, would you claim on your facility or your cyber insurance? Does a self-driving vehicle need insurance for humans, or is the insurer really just underwriting an algorithm?

How does a company adequately insure their staff against negligent loss of data, or exposing it to hackers through insufficient security protection?

These questions show just how complex the embryonic cyber insurance market can be. Some enterprises have explored coverage as a bulwark against financial loss from security attacks, but many of them need to accept it's not an "if" but a "when" scenario. However, the immaturity of the market and the complexity of modeling cyber risk make it a difficult requirement to navigate.

Allied Market Research has forecast that the cyber insurance market will be worth $14 billion by 2022. According to the Association of British Insurers, most cyber insurance policies have three common features, covering business interruption loss, privacy breach costs and forensic incident response.

"Business interruption might be the simplest [to insure] here, but there isn't a good catch-all answer for the cyber market, as it largely depends on the company or industry -- for example, whether you are big, small, have multiple locations or a complex network architecture," Matthew Honea, cyber director at Cyence, a San Mateo-based firm that quantifies the financial impact of cyber risk, told Security Now.

Insuring complex risks
Cyber risks are highly complicated to insure because the nature of the security threat is constantly evolving and mutating. On one side, enterprises have varying security measures in place and each company has a different attack surface. On the other, hackers constantly change targets, attack vectors, malware and payloads. With so many potential variables, it's a challenge for insurers to assess risk and therefore the current focus is on at least having some of the bases covered.

"While hackers do migrate to more complex attack techniques, strategies and ways to extract information, many fundamental concepts stay the same," said Honea. "Breaches start from either a technical process or a human process that was exploited, and that's what the [insurance] product focuses on. That being said, we also find ways to incorporate new and unprecedented macro factors, such as zero-day exploits being released publicly."

As a basic example of how risk modeling works, let's assume that a company has an FTP server that needs decommissioning. It will take time to move through the process and so the server needs to stay online throughout, until every step has been completed.

"Attackers like to target file servers because of the sensitive data that can be stored on them," said Honea. "The company will need to evaluate the cost of a breach on that server versus the cost to monitor the accounts, restrict access and upgrade the system."

Some traditional insurers are questioning whether it's a market they even want to pursue. A recent PWC report showed a 50/50 cyber insurance market split polarized by insurers that on one hand see this as an opportunity for business growth, and on the other, organizations that refuse to offer insurance for fear that it is effectively uninsurable.

Nevertheless, there are notable examples from 2017 that clearly point to the need for insurance.

"This year's WannaCry attack, which hit at least 150 countries, is a good example of a cyber incident that could have used cyber insurance for financial recovery, as Cyence estimated the potential costs from the hack at $8 billion," said Honea. "Another is AWS's four-hour outage in February, which (we) estimated lost S&P 500 companies $150 million."

2018 predictions
As we're on the cusp of 2018, here is what Honea expects we will be seeing. Companies will get smarter about how they allocate and spend budget on security protection.
"For example, we expect to see more security budgets include a portion dedicated to cyber insurance to help mitigate uncharted risks or identified risks where technology may not help," said Honea. "Furthermore, we'll start to see insurance leveraged as a way to bridge the gap that technology vendors leave, as cybersecurity solutions can't 100% guarantee protection." Malware will seek higher ransom rewards.
"With crypto-ransomware, attackers will focus on reaching the highest value systems that can cripple an entire company -- rather than targeting everyone and anyone -- until the ransom is met," said Honea. "This can readily lead to losses in reputation, revenue and business interruption for victim companies." Insurers will begin to grapple with cyber insurance for self-driving and autonomous vehicles.
"We'll begin to see insurers take a close look at how they should be covering auto in this new autonomous setting, including what types of data they can factor since historical demographics, like age group, won't be applicable," said Honea.

Related posts:

— Simon Marshall, Technology Journalist, special to Security Now

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Developing and Testing an Effective Breach Response Plan
Whether or not a data breach is a disaster for the organization depends on the security team's response and that is based on how the team developed a breach response plan beforehand and if it was thoroughly tested. Inside this report, experts share how to: -understand the technical environment, -determine what types of incidents would trigger the plan, -know which stakeholders need to be notified and how to do so, -develop steps to contain the breach, collect evidence, and initiate recovery.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-39044
PUBLISHED: 2022-12-07
Hidden functionality vulnerability in multiple Buffalo network devices allows a network-adjacent attacker with an administrative privilege to execute an arbitrary OS command. The affected products/versions are as follows: WCR-300 firmware Ver. 1.87 and earlier, WHR-HP-G300N firmware Ver. 2.00 and ea...
CVE-2022-40966
PUBLISHED: 2022-12-07
Authentication bypass vulnerability in multiple Buffalo network devices allows a network-adjacent attacker to bypass authentication and access the device. The affected products/versions are as follows: WCR-300 firmware Ver. 1.87 and earlier, WHR-HP-G300N firmware Ver. 2.00 and earlier, WHR-HP-GN fir...
CVE-2022-42458
PUBLISHED: 2022-12-07
Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in bingo!CMS version1.7.4.1 and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to upload an arbitrary file. As a result, an arbitrary script may be executed and/or a file may be altered.
CVE-2022-45910
PUBLISHED: 2022-12-07
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an LDAP query ('LDAP Injection') vulnerability in ActiveDirectory and Sharepoint ActiveDirectory authority connectors of Apache ManifoldCF allows an attacker to manipulate the LDAP search queries (DoS, additional queries, filter manipulation) durin...
CVE-2022-34840
PUBLISHED: 2022-12-07
Use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability in multiple Buffalo network devices allows a network-adjacent attacker to alter?configuration settings of the device. The affected products/versions are as follows: WZR-300HP firmware Ver. 2.00 and earlier, WZR-450HP firmware Ver. 2.00 and earlier, WZR-600...