Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT/Embedded Security

12/20/2017
12:40 PM
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
50%
50%

IoT Security Is a Matter of Life & Death

When the IoT enters the hospital room, its security becomes a matter of literal life and death.

If you're squeamish look away now. If not, know that 2018 may well herald a macabre new security disaster -- the deliberate injury or death of patients in hospitals at the hands of hackers.

Medical equipment is already being hacked in the wild, patient monitoring videos have been illegally viewed and x-ray machines have delivered dangerously high levels of radiation.

Dr. May Wang, co-founder and CTO of Zingbox
Dr. May Wang, co-founder and CTO of Zingbox

This is not science fiction. This is the new frontier in medical security as IOT devices become more connected, and so do adversaries.

"These are attacks we're already seeing out in the field," Dr. May Wang, co-founder and CTO of Zingbox, a Mountain View-based firm, told SecurityNow. "Moving into 2018, we will see an increasing number of attacks. Here, people tend to think more about information leakage, like patient records, but we'll be seeing more physical harm [caused]."

Dr. Wang knows about healthcare security. Zingbox secures IOT devices, but one of its main verticals is supplying security technology to hospitals. It claims to protect hospital operations from a cloud-delivered, clientless system and is already deploying in the US in several large hospitals, one of which is United Regional Health System in Texas.

Zingbox has already proven in a safe environment that the dosage of medical infusion pumps can be changed, and devices can be turned off.

"That alone could kill a patient. In fact, it may have already happened, but we just don't know that yet," said Wang.

She can't comment with certainty because, frankly, hospitals just don't want to talk about it right now.

"No one wants to come out and say, my hospital has just been attacked by ransomware, or how many vulnerabilities they have, or how much damage has been caused. Everyone cares so much about their reputation," she said.

Securing medicine
Dr. Wang was originally the principal architect in the Cisco CTO office, designing her own algorithms and now sits on the boards of many Silicon Valley VC firms, including SAIF Partners and Stanford Angels. In November she won three Stevie awards in the Woman of The Year Technology category.

When Zingbox started out just three years ago, IOT was beginning to bloom. But not too much was known about IOT security, according to Wang, "The question at the time was, do we really need a new security solution, or could we use existing IT security to protect connected devices."

Apparently, there was not much data available from the regular analyst firms about the total addressable market size, but Zingbox had guiding hands from experts at Fortinet, Netscreen, the Google machine learning team, Amazon and academics from Stanford and MIT.

One big problem was that there are lots of characteristics that made IOT devices unique. Then, there was the number of devices, multiplied by the number of networks, multiplied by the number of applications.

"One of the biggest challenges of IOT is scalability, there are so many different kinds of device. It's impossible to go out there and manually do the configuration for protection. [So,] now we're training the machines to think for themselves and be more adaptive, and more dynamic," said Wang.

IOT and humans
To take an appropriate analogy, and despite some complexity, IOT devices are not as complicated as human beings. They're not full-blown computational devices that require direct human control.

For example, x-ray machines only really do three things, image capture, image upgrade and image upload. That makes their behaviors very predictable, and if something malicious runs outside of those narrow functions, it's relatively straightforward for machine learning to enforce security rules.

Zingbox uses what it calls AI as a kind of replacement for a doctor in terms of learning and treating security issues.

"You'd be surprised at how many vulnerabilities there are," said Wang. "There are lots of vulnerabilities in today's IOT networks to begin with. But, there will be more attacks connected to these medical devices."

She claims the average time to detect malware in the healthcare system is about 326 days, suggesting that malicious actions have a wide spectrum of application and also, hackers can bide their time and only act when they really need to.

WannaCry
As WannaCry illustrated, ransoming data causes a huge amount of disruption. There's data loss, and then there's disruption to operational and patient services functions. Then there are third party service providers, who are often thought of as a weak link in the security chain.

"We've seen tens of thousands of ransomware attacks on one US facility alone," said Wang. In short, hospitals have to cancel consultations. Lifesaving surgery can't take place. Vital medical histories and treatment information are thrown to the breeze.

She says healthcare operations do at least know internally they need to deal with the situation, and they're moving fast. In 2018, she foresees increases in specialized security staff levels, organizational changes to make security more of a priority, and also increases in budgets. That could be substantial, given it will come from both IT groups and operational groups, since both are involved in securing IOT.

Related posts:

— Simon Marshall, Technology Journalist, special to Security Now

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities and attack visibility drove some significant changes in enterprise cybersecurity strategies over the past year. Dark Reading's 2021 Strategic Security Survey showed that many organizations are staying the course regarding the use of a mix of attack prevention and threat detection technologies and practices for dealing with cyber threats.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-37803
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-27
An SQL Injection vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Online Covid Vaccination Scheduler System 1.0 via the username in lognin.php .
CVE-2021-37805
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-27
A Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vunerability exists in Sourcecodeste Vehicle Parking Management System affected version 1.0 is via the add-vehicle.php endpoint.
CVE-2021-37806
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-27
An SQL Injection vulnerability exists in https://phpgurukul.com Vehicle Parking Management System affected version 1.0. The system is vulnerable to time-based SQL injection on multiple endpoints. Based on the SLEEP(N) function payload that will sleep for a number of seconds used on the (1) editid , ...
CVE-2021-37807
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-27
An SQL Injection vulneraility exists in https://phpgurukul.com Online Shopping Portal 3.1 via the email parameter on the /check_availability.php endpoint that serves as a checker whether a new user's email is already exist within the database.
CVE-2021-37808
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-27
SQL Injection vulnerabilities exist in https://phpgurukul.com News Portal Project 3.1 via the (1) category, (2) subcategory, (3) sucatdescription, and (4) username parameters, the server response is about (N) seconds delay respectively which mean it is vulnerable to MySQL Blind (Time Based). An atta...