Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV

1/23/2020
06:00 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

EFS Ransomware Slips by AV Products

Inside of Windows is a methodology called Encrypting File System. It works on individual files or folders, rather than at the whole disk level like BitLocker does.

Inside of Windows is a methodology called Encrypting File System (EFS). It works on individual files or folders, rather than at the whole disk level like BitLocker does. Researchers at SafeBreach have discovered that it can be used to create a new kind of ransomware as well.

EFS shows up in the business editions of Windows (like Pro, Professional, Business, Ultimate, Enterprise and Education). The encryption/decryption is carried out in the NTFS driver. Encryption/decryption is transparent to the user.

The SafeBreachers came up with a way for EFS to function as the encryptor as well as the decrypt in a ransomware scheme. The eight steps of its operation are detailed in their blog, if those details are germane.

But, the major effect of all this is that a new sort of ransomware was found to be practical. Worse (for users) is the range of affected versions the researchers found to be vulnerable. They said that "The EFS ransomware was tested with Windows 10 64-bit versions 1803, 1809 and 1903, but should also work on Windows 32-bit operating systems, and on earlier versions of Windows (probably Windows 8.x, Windows 7 and Windows Vista)." That's pretty much everything.

None of the Windows versions would detect the EFS ransomware as it functioned. Frankly, this is to be expected since the form and functionality of the EFS ransomware is novel.

The ransomware has functionality that contributed to it successfully carrying out its malicious mission. Because the files are encrypted at the NTFS driver level, it goes unnoticed by file-system filter drivers. Also, EFS ransomware doesn't require administrator rights. It will work well in limited user accounts. Finally, the EFS ransomware doesn't require human interaction. No social engineering to assure an action is needed.

But there are some shortcomings as well. There is a visible indicator (a small yellow padlock icon displayed at the top right corner of the file/folder main icon) that shows that something is going on during encryption.

If a Data Recovery Agent has been previously defined, it will make recovery "trivial," according to SafeBreach.

EFS can be turned off (and defeat the ransomware) for a machine by setting the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\EFS\EfsConfiguration to 1. Accessing this key requires administrator rights.

Late last year, SafeBreach shared what they were doing with major AV vendors. Some vendors (like F-Secure and Panda) would detect the approach and flag it, but most other vendors were forced to issue software updates to account for the possibility it presented.

Microsoft just huffed about it. They replied, "Microsoft considers Controlled Folder Access a defense-in-depth feature. We assessed this submittal to be a moderate class defense in depth issue, which does not meet the Microsoft Security Servicing Criteria for Windows."

SafeBreach summarizes the problem succinctly. "Signature-based solutions are not up to this job," they say, but "heuristics-based (and even more so -- generic technology-based) solutions seem more promising, but additional proactive research is required in order to "train" them against future threats."

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "The truth behind Stonehenge...."
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27886
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
rakibtg Docker Dashboard before 2021-02-28 allows command injection in backend/utilities/terminal.js via shell metacharacters in the command parameter of an API request. NOTE: this is NOT a Docker, Inc. product.
CVE-2016-8153
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8154
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8155
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8156
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.