Report: Paper Ballots More Secure, Accurate Than E-VotingReport: Paper Ballots More Secure, Accurate Than E-Voting
Fortify Software gives tips for ensuring your vote is actually counted and uncompromised by hackers
October 16, 2008
Casting your ballot by paper is the safest bet that your vote will be counted in this year’s election, according to a new report on voting security by Fortify Software.
Fortify ranked the most popular voting mechanisms by security and privacy to help voters ensure their vote is actually counted and safe from hacking. No. 1 is hand-counted paper and then optical scan; absentee; direct recording electronic (DRE); lever machine; and punch card.
“In November, voters will participate in one of the most critical elections in U.S. history, and unfortunately many will still be at risk of inaccurate vote tallying and e-voting software vulnerabilities,” says Brian Chess, chief scientist and co-founder of Fortify Software.
Different states and voting precincts offer different voting options. Paper ballots may seem old-fashioned, but they are actually the most accurate when it comes to counting votes because they are counted manually and easier to track, the Fortify report said. They also give voters a chance to verify their choices before they place the ballots in the ballot box. Only 10 states offer this option, including Alaska, Colorado, Maine, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
No. 2 on the list is optical-scan voting, where a hand-cast paper ballot is scanned by a computer that counts it. This method is used in all but 10 states and is considered the most accurate and verifiable way to vote. Around 55 percent of all voters will use paper ballots or optical scan voting in this election, the report said.
Absentee ballots, meanwhile, can be less accurate because a voter can’t ensure that their vote is counted, and there’s no privacy guarantee since the voter makes his or her selections outside the privacy of a polling booth.
DRE systems are the computerized voting machines that let you cast your vote via touch screen or button interfaces, and it’s recorded electronically. These systems have been criticized for lack of verifiability and accuracy, according to the report.
Electronic voting systems also have raised hacking concerns. “It is simply dangerous to rely on today’s electronic voting machines to deliver a fair and accurate election,” says Avi Rubin, professor of computer science at John Hopkins University. “The software flaws we uncovered before the 2004 election continue to plague today’s voting systems, and Fortify Software’s study provides voters with a solid assessment of their voting options for this November.”
Fortify said in the report that state and federal election officials must work with voting machine vendors to ensure security is built into their software so that citizens can be assured that every vote does count.
— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading
About the Author(s)
You May Also Like
Hacking Your Digital Identity: How Cybercriminals Can and Will Get Around Your Authentication MethodsOct 26, 2023
Modern Supply Chain Security: Integrated, Interconnected, and Context-DrivenNov 06, 2023
How to Combat the Latest Cloud Security ThreatsNov 06, 2023
Reducing Cyber Risk in Enterprise Email Systems: It's Not Just Spam and PhishingNov 01, 2023
SecOps & DevSecOps in the CloudNov 06, 2023
Passwords Are Passe: Next Gen Authentication Addresses Today's Threats
How to Deploy Zero Trust for Remote Workforce Security
What Ransomware Groups Look for in Enterprise Victims
How to Use Threat Intelligence to Mitigate Third-Party Risk
Concerns Mount Over Ransomware, Zero-Day Bugs, and AI-Enabled Malware
9 Traits You Need to Succeed as a Cybersecurity Leader
The Ultimate Guide to the CISSP
The Burnout Breach: How employee burnout is emerging as the next frontier in cybersecurity
Gone Phishing: How to Defend Against Persistent Phishing Attempts Targeting Your Organization
Business Buyers Guide to Password Managers