Anonymous To Launch Cyberattacks Against Trump Campaign Starting April 1Anonymous To Launch Cyberattacks Against Trump Campaign Starting April 1
Planned attacks a response to candidate’s controversial campaign rhetoric, hacking collective says.
March 15, 2016
In a reprise of numerous similar campaigns from the past, the Anonymous hacktivist collective has announced plans to disrupt Donald Trump’s presidential campaign by launching cyberattacks on websites associated with the controversial candidate, starting April 1.
In a message on Anonymous’ YouTube channel, an individual purporting to a be spokesman for the collective urged those aligned with its cause to shut down Trump campaign websites and to “expose what he doesn’t want the public to know.”
The spokesman, wearing the group’s signature Guy Fawkes mask, described the planned attacks as a response to Trump’s “appalling actions and ideas” in running his presidential campaign. “We need to dismantle his campaign and sabotage his brand,” the masked spokesman exhorted viewers.
The Trump attack announcement, with its usual colorful rhetoric, has raised some predictable questions about whether Anonymous is really capable any longer of mustering the support needed to launch a disruptive cyber campaign against the leading Republican presidential candidate.
Rene Paap, security evangelist at A10 Networks says the Trump campaign appears to have foreseen the threat and protected its domain by using a Content Delivery Network (CDN) service.
“A CDN provides an extra caching layer in-between the content of a website and the client browser. It is a large network with many points of presence around the world, aimed to redirect a browser to the nearest location where cached content is served,” says Paap. “For Anonymous to break through this is going to be difficult, as the CDN anticipates DDoS attacks,” he says.
Anonymous and its collection of loosely affiliated followers around the world have pulled off several high-profile hacktivist campaigns in the past. Among the examples that Anonymous itself touts are a 2008 campaign against the Church of Scientology, in which it crashed the church’s website; Operation Darknet, in which it exposed IP addresses of nearly 200 alleged pedophiles; and its release of an incriminating video in a 2012 case involving a sexual assault on a high school girl in Steubenville, Ohio.
Following last year’s terrorist attacks on France’s satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, Anonymous launched a campaign to expose and disrupt websites spreading jihadist propaganda and, more recently, it has committed to doing the same to ISIS-affiliated websites. Soon after launching the campaign last February, Anonymous claimed it had succeeded in taking down over 1,000 sites and over 9,000 Twitter accounts affiliated with the terror group.
Whether or not Anonymous can replicate such campaigns in its planned attacks against Trump websites and online presence remains to be seen.
Regardless of how successful or not the planned attack is going to be, Anonymous’ call to attack the Trump campaign is another example of how the world of politics and cybersecurity are becoming increasingly intertwined.
The Internet -- social media, in particular -- has become a primary vehicle for candidates to communicate with voters, raise campaign awareness, target specific demographic, gauge voter sentiment, and solicit donations. But the growing use of these channels has given threat actors new ways to attack Internet users, security vendor Forcepoint had noted last year in its 2016 predictions report (registration required).
One of the dangers is that attackers will use email lures related to 2016 campaign issues to try and distribute malicious payloads to unsuspecting users. “Attackers frequently see large events as an opportunity to launch cyber-attacks on a curious population,” Forcepoint pointed out in its report. “Political campaigns, platforms and candidates present a huge opportunity to tailor highly effective lures.”
Another issue is the use of social media to misrepresent or to misdirect public perception of candidates and events related to the presidential campaign. As one example, the Forcepoint report pointed to a campaign by the Syrian Electronic Army (SEA) where hackers supporting the government of President Bashar al-Assad targeted and defaced sites belonging to rival groups.
Hackers affiliated with the same group also targeted the Facebook pages of former French President Nicolas Sarkozy and President Obama with spam messages supporting al-Assad, Forcepoint noted in its report. “The SEA also took over the Twitter accounts of legitimate news organizations, tweeting false news updates, creating uncertainty and alarm as the messages spread online before these accounts were again secured.”
Bob Hansmann, Forcepoint’s director of security analysis and strategy says that campaigns that want to mitigate such threats need to make cybersecurity a core part of their planning. “A qualified CISO, as a ranking member of the campaign team, would be a game changer,” for the presidential candidates, Hansmann says in comments to Dark Reading.
“If a campaign team has one and, more importantly, if they listen to them, then the odds are in their favor,” he says. “They are likely less susceptible to an attack as well as more likely to maintain key operations in the face of a full or partially successful attack.”
About the Author(s)
You May Also Like
Hacking Your Digital Identity: How Cybercriminals Can and Will Get Around Your Authentication MethodsOct 26, 2023
Modern Supply Chain Security: Integrated, Interconnected, and Context-DrivenNov 06, 2023
How to Combat the Latest Cloud Security ThreatsNov 06, 2023
Reducing Cyber Risk in Enterprise Email Systems: It's Not Just Spam and PhishingNov 01, 2023
SecOps & DevSecOps in the CloudNov 06, 2023