Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

5/23/2016
05:40 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Why Microsoft's New Office 2016 Macro Control Feature Matters

Resurgence in macro attacks result in Microsoft adding new protections from macro abuse.

Macro attacks on Windows machines have been on a tear over the past year. This 1990s-era threat’s comeback has been spotted in both targeted and more widespread attack campaigns.

Microsoft says some 98% of all Office threats employ malicious macros, and recent events illustrate the phenomenon: high-profile attack campaigns including the most recent point-of-sale (PoS) attacks on some 100 organizations in the hospitality, restaurant, and retail industries, use malicious macros, and Neutrino--also known as Kasidet—surged in February, using malicious Microsoft Office macros to spread the backdoor malware that also drops Dridex banking malware on its victims’ machines. Ransomware attacks often arrive via attachments with Word macro downloaders.

Even the infamous blackout attack in the Ukraine used a malicious macro. “A two-year old Office [vulnerability and a] macro was enabled in [their] Office suites," says Cameron Camp, a security researcher at ESET.

The good news is that Microsoft has added a new feature to Office 2016—currently in RTM release--that lets organizations designate macro use to specific situations and to block macro enablement in high-risk situations. Microsoft long ago removed the by-default enablement of macros, but users can enable macros if they need them for automating tasks such as automatically opening Word files, filling in forms, or performing calculations. With attackers upping their social engineering game in spear phishing emails, macros have become one of the most popular attack vectors in the past year, prompting calls for more controls over macro code.

“Macro-based malware is on the rise and we understand it is a frustrating experience for everyone. To help counter this threat, we are releasing a new feature in Office 2016 that blocks macros from loading in certain high-risk scenarios,” the Microsoft Malware Protection Center said in a late March blog post announcing the new feature. “This feature can be controlled via Group Policy and configured per application. It enables enterprise administrators to block macros from running in Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents that come from the Internet.”

Among these risky scenarios: documents downloaded from the Internet; document attachments that were sent from outside the organization; and documents opened from file-sharing or other public shares.

Microsoft isn’t the only vendor seeing macro attacks surge. Intel’s McAfee Labs recently reported a massive spike in macro malware over the past 18 months. Year over year growth in macro threats tripled by the end of the third quarter of 2015, with 45,000 cases of new macro malware during that quarter, up from under 10,000 in the third quarter of 2014. According to McAfee, macro malware was at their highest level since 2009.

But today’s macro attacks are more sophisticated than those of the ‘90s: they’re often encrypted or obfuscated by attackers, thus making them more difficult to detect.

The use of malicious macros in the December cyberattack on Western Ukraine’s power supply demonstrated how macros can be part of the attack chain in a destructive cyberattack. The attackers employed malicious macros in an Excel spreadsheet, according to Ehud Shamir, chief security officer with SentinelOne, who reverse-engineered a sample of the BlackEnergy 3 malware, the variant used to infect machines at power distribution operation centers in Ukraine. Shamir found that macro-rigged Excel spreadsheets dropped the payload, which included a network sniffer for reconnaissance efforts.

Black Energy 3 is known to be capable of delivering malware via macros.

Shamir said in an earlier interview that the attackers either targeted older unpatched Office systems, or enabled the macros so they would install the malicious code.

Meanwhile, Paul Ducklin, a security evangelist at Sophos, says the new policy option in Office 2016 provides “finer” control over documents with macros. “You can now limit the functionality of the macro programming system so that even if users normally have the chance to enable macros, they can’t if the macros came in an Office file from the internet,” Ducklin said in a recent post.

Related Content:

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
johnsonberry
50%
50%
johnsonberry,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/5/2018 | 6:15:37 AM
Solution
The embedded object or script downloads the encrypted file to %appdata% with a random file name and proceeds to decrypt it using the script's decryption function.
johnsonberry
50%
50%
johnsonberry,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/5/2018 | 6:15:03 AM
Solution
The embedded object or script downloads the encrypted file to AppData with a random file name and proceeds to decrypt it using the script's decryption function.

MS Surface Support
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-3493
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
The overlayfs implementation in the linux kernel did not properly validate with respect to user namespaces the setting of file capabilities on files in an underlying file system. Due to the combination of unprivileged user namespaces along with a patch carried in the Ubuntu kernel to allow unprivile...
CVE-2021-3492
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
Shiftfs, an out-of-tree stacking file system included in Ubuntu Linux kernels, did not properly handle faults occurring during copy_from_user() correctly. These could lead to either a double-free situation or memory not being freed at all. An attacker could use this to cause a denial of service (ker...
CVE-2020-2509
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QTS and QuTS hero. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands in a compromised application. We have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 4.5.2.1566 Build 20210202 and later Q...
CVE-2020-36195
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
An SQL injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP NAS running Multimedia Console or the Media Streaming add-on. If exploited, the vulnerability allows remote attackers to obtain application information. QNAP has already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions of Multimedia C...
CVE-2021-29445
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
jose-node-esm-runtime is an npm package which provides a number of cryptographic functions. In versions prior to 3.11.4 the AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2 Algorithm (A128CBC-HS256, A192CBC-HS384, A256CBC-HS512) decryption would always execute both HMAC tag verification and CBC decryption, if either failed `JWEDe...