Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

1/11/2019
11:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Who Takes Responsibility for Cyberattacks in the Cloud?

A new CSA report addresses the issue of breach responsibility as more organizations move ERP application data the cloud.

When cloud data is breached, who is responsible? A new Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) report poses the question at a time when companies are moving enterprise resource planning (ERP) application data to the cloud and expect cloud-focused cyberattacks to increase in 2019.

The study, "Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Applications and Cloud Adoption," was conducted by CSA and sponsored by Onapsis. Researchers polled 199 managers, C-level executives, and staff from businesses in the Americas (49%), APAC (26%), and EMEA (25%).

They found 69% of organizations plan to migrate their data for popular ERP applications to the cloud and use major cloud infrastructure-as-a-service providers. Nearly 90% of respondents say the applications they plan on migrating to the cloud are business-critical. Respondents in the Americas (73%) and APAC (73%) were most likely to report migrating business-critical applications to the cloud compared with those in EMEA, where regulations like GDPR interfere with enterprise plans for tech investments, cloud services, and third-party policies.

The biggest benefit of moving to the cloud, respondents say, is scalability of new technologies (65%). Their next given reason is lower cost of ownership (61%), followed by security patching and updating from the provider (49%). Obstacles to cloud adoption, they say, include moving sensitive data (65%), security (59%), and compliance challenges (54%).

On a positive note, companies are taking steps to protect cloud-based ERP applications with identity and access controls (68%), firewalls (63%), and vulnerability assessment (62%).

But attackers' capabilities are evolving alongside businesses' security moves. More than half of survey respondents expect security incidents in the cloud to increase over the coming year.

Their thoughts prompt questions about who is accountable for cyberattacks in the cloud. Sixty percent of participants say they believe cloud services providers are responsible for breaches, but 77% say it's the organization's responsibility to secure their ERP applications. Third parties hold the least amount of accountability and responsibility for cloud breaches, the data shows.

"The cloud computing ecosystem is maturing rapidly and business-critical applications, such as ERP solutions, are being moved to cloud environments," said John Yeoh, director of research, Americas, for the Cloud Security Alliance, in a statement. "With this shift, organizations are starting to explore the question of whether a cloud environment might alleviate traditional challenges that business-critical applications normally face."

Regardless of their cloud providers, businesses planning a migration must implement security from the start and in phases throughout the project. Onapsis studies have found that implementing security in each phase of the migration could save businesses more than five times their implementation costs, said Juan Pablo Perez-Etchegoyen, Onapsis CTO.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
skalra
50%
50%
skalra,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/16/2019 | 10:20:22 PM
Shared responsibility
All the more reason why shared responsibility should be taken seriously. There is no shared hopefulness; organizations must harden their security posture while maintaining an environment friendly to the goals promised by the cloud. 
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
1/14/2019 | 3:23:43 PM
Woz
Anybody remember when Steve Wozniak - the savant of all time - said " there is no security in the cloud."   Yeap, he was right as he was about almost everything. 
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/2/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9498
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older may mishandle pointers involved inprocessing data received via RDP static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series ofspecially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possiblyallowing arbitrary code to be executed...
CVE-2020-3282
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack...
CVE-2020-5909
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.
CVE-2020-5910
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the Neural Autonomic Transport System (NATS) messaging services in use by the NGINX Controller do not require any form of authentication, so any successful connection would be authorized.
CVE-2020-5911
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the NGINX Controller installer starts the download of Kubernetes packages from an HTTP URL On Debian/Ubuntu system.