Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

12/31/2015
08:30 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Tor Project To Launch Bug Bounty Program

Open Technology Fund will sponsor program and HackerOne will manage it

The Tor Project will soon offer cash rewards to those who discover vulnerabilities in the service, which is used by millions of Internet users to surf anonymously on the web.

Motherboard Tuesday quoted Tor co-founders Nick Mathewson and Roger Dingledine as saying the bug bounty program will launch in 2016 and will be sponsored by Open Technology Fund (OTF), an organization that supports Internet freedom initiatives worldwide.

OTF will pay vulnerability management and bug bounty coordination organization HackerOne to help the Tor Project manage the soon-to-be-launched program, Motherboard reported.

Initially at least, Tor’s bug bounty program will operate on an invitation only basis meaning that only security researchers who have been selected by the group will be eligible for rewards if they find vulnerabilities in Tor applications. Motherboard did not say when Tor would make the program open to all.

Tor’s plans to launch a bug bounty program appears to be a bid by the organization to identify and close vulnerabilities in its applications that could be exploited by attackers to unmask the identities of those using the service. It’s likely that the operators of Tor were motivated by recent reports about the FBI having paid nearly $1 million to security researchers at Carnegie Mellon University to exploit a vulnerability in the platform that led to a large number of hidden service users being unmasked.

The reports prompted a sharp rebuke from Tor, which chastised the CMU researchers for violating the ethical guidelines of security research.

Carnegie Mellon itself denied that its researchers received any money from the FBI to expose users on Tor but hinted that some of its research involving a vulnerability in Tor may have been accessed by the government through a subpoena.

Tor is easily the best known and most widely used identity-cloaking platform on the Internet. Ordinary individuals, journalists, privacy advocates, whistleblowers and dissidents use the service to communicate with each other, to browse the Web and to share information without revealing their true identities. Many consider Tor as vital to enabling information sharing and freedom of expression especially in countries with repressive regimes.

But law enforcement authorities and intelligence agencies in the US and other countries have criticized Tor’s service for providing what they have described as a safe haven for terrorists, drug peddlers, purveyors of child pornography and other criminals. The FBI and others have repeatedly pointed to Tor as a prime example of the so-called Dark Web and have called for measures that would allow them greater visibility into the activities going on there.

The FBI’s highly publicized takedown in 2014 of over 400 Tor website addresses, including Silk Road 2.0, that were involved in drug trafficking, counterfeit goods, fake identities, weapons and other illicit goods raised considerable concern about the reliability of Tor’s cloaking mechanisms.

Though the operators of Tor and security researchers have insisted the website takedowns happened only because of operational mistakes on the part of the site owners and not because of any inherent weaknesses in Tor, concerns about the platform have continued to linger.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
12/31/2015 | 9:49:07 AM
TOR
Bug bounty programs are always beneficial to the product. I think for all the ethical issues that TOR may pose, being able to provide information privately is not such a terrible premise. I think TOR early on had the capability to be something ethically sound but like most things people exploited it and turned it into this ugly monster. (At least from a ethical standpoint)
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
How Security Vendors Can Address the Cybersecurity Talent Shortage
Rob Rashotte, VP of Global Training and Technical Field Enablement at Fortinet,  5/24/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-7068
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7069
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7070
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7071
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2019-7072
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .