Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

12/31/2015
08:30 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Tor Project To Launch Bug Bounty Program

Open Technology Fund will sponsor program and HackerOne will manage it

The Tor Project will soon offer cash rewards to those who discover vulnerabilities in the service, which is used by millions of Internet users to surf anonymously on the web.

Motherboard Tuesday quoted Tor co-founders Nick Mathewson and Roger Dingledine as saying the bug bounty program will launch in 2016 and will be sponsored by Open Technology Fund (OTF), an organization that supports Internet freedom initiatives worldwide.

OTF will pay vulnerability management and bug bounty coordination organization HackerOne to help the Tor Project manage the soon-to-be-launched program, Motherboard reported.

Initially at least, Tor’s bug bounty program will operate on an invitation only basis meaning that only security researchers who have been selected by the group will be eligible for rewards if they find vulnerabilities in Tor applications. Motherboard did not say when Tor would make the program open to all.

Tor’s plans to launch a bug bounty program appears to be a bid by the organization to identify and close vulnerabilities in its applications that could be exploited by attackers to unmask the identities of those using the service. It’s likely that the operators of Tor were motivated by recent reports about the FBI having paid nearly $1 million to security researchers at Carnegie Mellon University to exploit a vulnerability in the platform that led to a large number of hidden service users being unmasked.

The reports prompted a sharp rebuke from Tor, which chastised the CMU researchers for violating the ethical guidelines of security research.

Carnegie Mellon itself denied that its researchers received any money from the FBI to expose users on Tor but hinted that some of its research involving a vulnerability in Tor may have been accessed by the government through a subpoena.

Tor is easily the best known and most widely used identity-cloaking platform on the Internet. Ordinary individuals, journalists, privacy advocates, whistleblowers and dissidents use the service to communicate with each other, to browse the Web and to share information without revealing their true identities. Many consider Tor as vital to enabling information sharing and freedom of expression especially in countries with repressive regimes.

But law enforcement authorities and intelligence agencies in the US and other countries have criticized Tor’s service for providing what they have described as a safe haven for terrorists, drug peddlers, purveyors of child pornography and other criminals. The FBI and others have repeatedly pointed to Tor as a prime example of the so-called Dark Web and have called for measures that would allow them greater visibility into the activities going on there.

The FBI’s highly publicized takedown in 2014 of over 400 Tor website addresses, including Silk Road 2.0, that were involved in drug trafficking, counterfeit goods, fake identities, weapons and other illicit goods raised considerable concern about the reliability of Tor’s cloaking mechanisms.

Though the operators of Tor and security researchers have insisted the website takedowns happened only because of operational mistakes on the part of the site owners and not because of any inherent weaknesses in Tor, concerns about the platform have continued to linger.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
12/31/2015 | 9:49:07 AM
TOR
Bug bounty programs are always beneficial to the product. I think for all the ethical issues that TOR may pose, being able to provide information privately is not such a terrible premise. I think TOR early on had the capability to be something ethically sound but like most things people exploited it and turned it into this ugly monster. (At least from a ethical standpoint)
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27132
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
SerComm AG Combo VD625 AGSOT_2.1.0 devices allow CRLF injection (for HTTP header injection) in the download function via the Content-Disposition header.
CVE-2021-25284
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in through SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. salt.modules.cmdmod can log credentials to the info or error log level.
CVE-2021-3144
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, eauth tokens can be used once after expiration. (They might be used to run command against the salt master or minions.)
CVE-2021-3148
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. Sending crafted web requests to the Salt API can result in salt.utils.thin.gen_thin() command injection because of different handling of single versus double quotes. This is related to salt/utils/thin.py.
CVE-2021-3151
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
i-doit before 1.16.0 is affected by Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issues that could allow remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, C__M...