Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

3/15/2017
12:00 PM
Kelly Sheridan
Kelly Sheridan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail

The 6 Riskiest Social Media Habits to Avoid at Work

Cybercriminals are turning to Facebook, Twitter and other platforms to launch attacks via employee behavior that could be putting your business at risk.
2 of 8

Oversharing sensitive information
Most people don't think twice about the personal information they make publicly available. Social media accounts are 'a treasure trove' of birthdates, education histories, and family relations. All of this data is commonly used in security checks for password recovery forms, says Laliberte.
'An attacker trying to gain access to your corporate email account could easily guess the password recovery questions,' he explains, citing 'Who was your best friend growing up?' and 'What city were you born in?' as common examples. Both answers could be found in public profiles on Facebook or LinkedIn.
Blair explains how both executives and privileged users, who have access to sensitive information on clients and partners, are at high risk of being targeted. Administrators are also key targets because they manage executive accounts and could be hackers' gateways into an organization. While these privileged users are often the most security savvy, he says, they are also at greatest risk.
Oversharing may also lead to physical security risks, a concern especially relevant to high-ranking company officials, says Blair. Threat actors can easily determine someone's location from a Facebook post or tweet.
'If you're the executive of a big company, that's opening yourself up to an incredible amount of risk,' he cautions.
(Image: Tomek_Pa via Shutterstock)

Oversharing sensitive information

Most people don't think twice about the personal information they make publicly available. Social media accounts are "a treasure trove" of birthdates, education histories, and family relations. All of this data is commonly used in security checks for password recovery forms, says Laliberte.

"An attacker trying to gain access to your corporate email account could easily guess the password recovery questions," he explains, citing "Who was your best friend growing up?" and "What city were you born in?" as common examples. Both answers could be found in public profiles on Facebook or LinkedIn.

Blair explains how both executives and privileged users, who have access to sensitive information on clients and partners, are at high risk of being targeted. Administrators are also key targets because they manage executive accounts and could be hackers' gateways into an organization. While these privileged users are often the most security savvy, he says, they are also at greatest risk.

Oversharing may also lead to physical security risks, a concern especially relevant to high-ranking company officials, says Blair. Threat actors can easily determine someone's location from a Facebook post or tweet.

"If you're the executive of a big company, that's opening yourself up to an incredible amount of risk," he cautions.

(Image: Tomek_Pa via Shutterstock)

2 of 8
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: I've never actually seen the corporate ladder before.
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18898
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following vulnerability in the trousers package of SUSE SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1; openSUSE Factory allowed local attackers escalate privileges from user tss to root. This issue affects: SUSE SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1 trousers versions prior to 0.3.14...
CVE-2019-19837
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
Incorrect access control in the web interface in Ruckus Wireless Unleashed through 200.7.10.102.64 allows remote information disclosure of bin/web.conf via HTTP requests.
CVE-2020-7210
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
Umbraco CMS 8.2.2 allows CSRF to enable/disable or delete user accounts.
CVE-2019-19835
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
SSRF in AjaxRestrictedCmdStat in zap in Ruckus Wireless Unleashed through 200.7.10.102.64 allows a remote denial of service via the server attribute to the tools/_rcmdstat.jsp URI.
CVE-2020-5216
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.9.0, 5.2.0, and 6.3.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a newline could be injected leading to limited header injection. Upon seei...