Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

5/18/2016
11:10 AM
50%
50%

Survey: Customers Lose Trust In Brands After A Data Breach

Survey by FireEye highlights customer reluctance to continue with service providers with weak cybersecurity.

The average customer worries more about cybersecurity than companies believe -- and the cost of a data breach is much more than meets the eye. That was the verdict of a market poll commissioned recently by cybersecurity provider FireEye on growing public concerns regarding data privacy.

The survey was conducted among US consumers by independent technology market research specialist Vanson Bourne. Around 2000 adults were interviewed within the US in April. 

Emerging themes include the fact that consumers are likely to be less trusting of major brands that have suffered a large breach and in the case of case of personally experiencing a breach, 90 percent of repondents said they would want to be informed within 24 hours.

Of those interviewed, 76 percent said they would move away from companies with a high record of data breaches while 72 percent said they will now “share fewer personal details with companies”.

This stance is likely to hit businesses of entities like search engines and social media platforms that are dependent on collecting consumer data for advertisers, says FireEye.

For complete details of the survey, click here.                               

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2016 | 10:16:37 AM
Re: Growing awareness
"One other reference point in one survey (KPMG, Feb 2016) was that a huge majority of procurement managers surveyed would consider removing a breached supplier from their rosters"

That's interesting to note. Vendors/third parties can affect ones brand reputation as well. Also, depending on how a company interacts with a third party, that third parties security shortcomings can become a monumental risk to the organization to which they provide service.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2016 | 10:12:45 AM
Indirect Cost
Brand reputation loss is an indirect cost of a breach. Though difficult to measure in dollars, it can be more detrimental to a company then direct costs from a breach.
Vertices
50%
50%
Vertices,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/23/2016 | 9:21:01 AM
Growing awareness
Recent studies in the UK also show broadly similar statistics. One other reference point in one survey (KPMG, Feb 2016) was that a huge majority of procurement managers surveyed would consider removing a breached supplier from their rosters. Sobering.

PerfectCobalt
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11844
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
CVE-2020-6937
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
CVE-2020-7648
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
CVE-2020-7650
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
CVE-2020-7654
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.