Vulnerabilities / Threats

5/18/2016
11:10 AM
50%
50%

Survey: Customers Lose Trust In Brands After A Data Breach

Survey by FireEye highlights customer reluctance to continue with service providers with weak cybersecurity.

The average customer worries more about cybersecurity than companies believe -- and the cost of a data breach is much more than meets the eye. That was the verdict of a market poll commissioned recently by cybersecurity provider FireEye on growing public concerns regarding data privacy.

The survey was conducted among US consumers by independent technology market research specialist Vanson Bourne. Around 2000 adults were interviewed within the US in April. 

Emerging themes include the fact that consumers are likely to be less trusting of major brands that have suffered a large breach and in the case of case of personally experiencing a breach, 90 percent of repondents said they would want to be informed within 24 hours.

Of those interviewed, 76 percent said they would move away from companies with a high record of data breaches while 72 percent said they will now “share fewer personal details with companies”.

This stance is likely to hit businesses of entities like search engines and social media platforms that are dependent on collecting consumer data for advertisers, says FireEye.

For complete details of the survey, click here.                               

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2016 | 10:16:37 AM
Re: Growing awareness
"One other reference point in one survey (KPMG, Feb 2016) was that a huge majority of procurement managers surveyed would consider removing a breached supplier from their rosters"

That's interesting to note. Vendors/third parties can affect ones brand reputation as well. Also, depending on how a company interacts with a third party, that third parties security shortcomings can become a monumental risk to the organization to which they provide service.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2016 | 10:12:45 AM
Indirect Cost
Brand reputation loss is an indirect cost of a breach. Though difficult to measure in dollars, it can be more detrimental to a company then direct costs from a breach.
Vertices
50%
50%
Vertices,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/23/2016 | 9:21:01 AM
Growing awareness
Recent studies in the UK also show broadly similar statistics. One other reference point in one survey (KPMG, Feb 2016) was that a huge majority of procurement managers surveyed would consider removing a breached supplier from their rosters. Sobering.

PerfectCobalt
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-20735
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in BMC PATROL Agent through 11.3.01. It was found that the PatrolCli application can allow for lateral movement and escalation of privilege inside a Windows Active Directory environment. It was found that by default the PatrolCli / PATROL Agent application only...
CVE-2019-0624
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
A spoofing vulnerability exists when a Skype for Business 2015 server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted request, aka "Skype for Business 2015 Spoofing Vulnerability." This affects Skype.
CVE-2019-0646
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Team Foundation Server does not properly sanitize user provided input, aka "Team Foundation Server Cross-site Scripting Vulnerability." This affects Team.
CVE-2019-0647
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Team Foundation Server does not properly handle variables marked as secret, aka "Team Foundation Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Team.
CVE-2018-20727
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
Multiple command injection vulnerabilities in NeDi before 1.7Cp3 allow authenticated users to execute code on the server side via the flt parameter to Nodes-Traffic.php, the dv parameter to Devices-Graph.php, or the tit parameter to drawmap.php.