Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

'Stresspaint' Targets Facebook Credentials

New malware variant goes after login credentials for popular Facebook pages.

Malware posing as a stress-relieving application has added to the stress of tens of thousands of Facebook users. And while this campaign appears to now have gone dormant, signs point to the possibility of more of this stress-related malware to come in the future.

Researchers at Radware found the malware, called Stresspaint, targeting the user credentials of Facebook users.

"We saw some indicators of information being stolen from a machine and while doing that we found an interesting command and control mechanism," says Adi Raff, security research team lead at Radware.

The threat actors weren't looking for just any Facebook users, either. "They were generally looking for Facebook accounts controlling a Facebook page or that had a payment method associated with them," says Raff. They also were looking for "pages with a lot of followers," he says.

Stresspoint gets delivered either via email or Facebook message. The link portends to be for a legitimate stress-relieving art program called "Relieve Stress Paint" to be downloaded from a legitimate website, AOL.com. In reality, the link is to a Unicode site that appears to be AOL, but in actuality leads to user to a malicious app store.

Once downloaded, a paint program runs on the user machine. While it is running, though, malware is sorting through the user's data looking for saved Facebook credentials or login cookies. Once found, the data is exfiltrated to the C&C server, which is based on an open source Chinese CMS named Layuicms2.0.

Since the malware doesn't look for general user credentials or other data, there are many security programs that won't trigger on its behavior, allowing it to fly under the radar on some user systems. During the initial infection period, approximately 10,000 systems per day were infected, a number that puts this on par with successful botnet campaigns. 

Raff says that there are indications that the group responsible for the Stresspaint malware is more than a collection of script kiddies. "Just a few hours before we pushed the information we saw a variant, [so] it could be a work in progress," Raff says. "Being able to infect so many machines in a short time takes skill — this was not the first time these people did it. They knew what they were doing." 

Once Radware published initial results of their research, the attackers took notice. "When we released the blog about it, [the threat actors] saw it and the infection rate went down. A few hours later, the C&C server went down," Raff says.

Even so, Raff says the server could easily be re-established. That, and a section in the C&C CMS dedicated to Amazon, leads Raff and the research team to believe that the group has more plans for both the network and the malware.

Nothing in the Stresspaint campaign is so novel as to require new technology or methods to avoid infection. The researchers counsel user training, link awareness (including Unicode visibility) and two-factor authentication as basic web hygiene steps that will significantly reduce the chance of additional stress from Stresspaint infection.

Related Content:

Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop ITX. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the security track here. Register with Promo Code DR200 and save $200.

Curtis Franklin Jr. is Senior Editor at Dark Reading. In this role he focuses on product and technology coverage for the publication. In addition he works on audio and video programming for Dark Reading and contributes to activities at Interop ITX, Black Hat, INsecurity, and ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Exploits Released for As-Yet Unpatched Critical Citrix Flaw
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/13/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
Microsoft Patches Windows Vuln Discovered by the NSA
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/14/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5397
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not incl...
CVE-2019-17635
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
Eclipse Memory Analyzer version 1.9.1 and earlier is subject to a deserialization vulnerability if an index file of a parsed heap dump is replaced by a malicious version and the heap dump is reopened in Memory Analyzer. The user must chose to reopen an already parsed heap dump with an untrusted inde...
CVE-2019-19339
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
It was found that the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 kpatch update did not include the complete fix for CVE-2018-12207. A flaw was found in the way Intel CPUs handle inconsistency between, virtual to physical memory address translations in CPU's local cache and system software's Paging structure entries...
CVE-2007-6070
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1382. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-1382. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1382 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent ...
CVE-2019-17634
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
Eclipse Memory Analyzer version 1.9.1 and earlier is subject to a cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability when generating an HTML report from a malicious heap dump. The user must chose todownload, open the malicious heap dump and generate an HTML report for the problem to occur. The heap dump could...