Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

11/24/2015
03:50 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

RSA Warns Of Zero Detection Trojan

GlassRAT has remained undetected for more than three years while stealthily targeting victims, security firm says.

It’s apparently not just zero-day vulnerabilities that organizations need to worry about these days, but also zero detection malware threats.

For the second time in recent weeks, a security vendor has issued a warning about a malware tool that appears to have evaded detection for multiple years while stealthily going about targeting victims.

The malware, called GlassRAT, appears to have been released back in 2012. The limited telemetry and anecdotal reports that are available on it indicate that GlassRAT has been used to target Chinese nationals at large multinational companies, RSA Research said in an alert released this week.

The “zero detection” malware, which is signed with a digital certificate apparently misappropriated from a Chinese software developer, is “transparent” to most antivirus tools, RSA researchers said in the report. It is detectable only via network forensics and specialized tools that are capable of detecting suspicious activity on endpoint systems, they said.

“GlassRAT appears to have operated, stealthily, for nearly 3 years in some environments,” the paper noted.

The RSA researchers described GlassRAT, as a well-designed remote access trojan that is being used in a highly targeted manner. The dropper used to deliver the payload is digitally signed and deletes itself from the system after its task is complete.  Once installed, the malicious file itself remains below the radar of endpoint anti-malware tools.

The malware provides reverse shell functionality on an infected system allowing the threat actors behind GlassRAT to directly connect to it from a remote location. The malware is designed to steal data, transfer files and relay system information to the attackers.

 “What makes GlassRAT notable is not what it is, but perhaps rather where it came from, who is using it, and for what purpose," the researchers said.

Available information on GlassRAT suggests that it is connected to, or at least has used the same command and control infrastructure that other malware campaigns in the past have used to target organizations of strategic and geopolitical significance, the RSA researchers said.

Two domains associated with GlassRAT for instance, were previously associated with the Mirage and PlugX campaigns that targeted military and government organizations in Mongolia and the Philippines. The overlap window is fairly small suggesting that the threat actors behind GlassRAT may have made an operational slip in using the same infrastructure.

The threat represented by malware like GlassRAT should not be underestimated because there may be many more undetected or non-detectable samples like it in the world, the researchers said. “ It is also crucially important to recognize the potential origins of these attacks, when detected, to better understand risks to the organization.”

GlassRAT marks the second time this month when a security vendor has warned about a malware threat that remained undetected for a lengthy period. Earlier this month, Trustwave issued an alert on Cherry Picker, a point of sale malware tool that like GlassRAT remained below the radar for more than four years before being discovered.

Trustwave pointed to Cherry Picker’s use of encryption, modified configuration files and sophisticated obfuscation techniques as reasons why the malware remained undetected for so long. According to researchers at the company, no malware they have encountered goes quite as far as Cherry Picker does in cleaning up after itself after infecting a system.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
theb0x
100%
0%
theb0x,
User Rank: Ninja
12/2/2015 | 10:29:53 AM
Re: "Transparent"
It's because of how the exploit drops directly into RAM bypassing any security software. This teqnique is nothing new. The dropper can be encoded dozens of times to such a point that even using the most advanced file heuristic analysis it goes undetected.  It also has polymorphic properties so it is capable of self modifying it's own code to further evade detection. This makes signature based detection also useless. Another method used is covert application channels where shell code is injected into a file such as calc.exe or system file and the digital file signature is also forged. All connections established by the RAT are fully encrypted utilizing Reverse_TCP connection method. Because the infected system is 'phoning home' it in most cases is allowed through the firewall. One way to prevent this connection attempt is to have proper implicit deny ACLs in place. However, one would have to be able to monitor and identify the outgoing encrypted traffic or any network traffic for that matter and verifiy it is in fact legitimate. Constant whitelisting would need to be properly applied without the distruption of 'Normal' traffic. I do not see any practical solution to this in the near future.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
11/27/2015 | 11:49:36 PM
Re: "Transparent"
The transparency or "invisibility" comes through the faulty certificate and, possibly, from other characteristics that make it behave like an innocent file.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
11/25/2015 | 11:24:28 AM
Security Measures
What security measures and best practices should be used for a trojan that is detectable only via network forensics and specialized tools that are capable of detecting suspicious activity on endpoint systems? Also, what are these "specialized tools"?
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
11/25/2015 | 11:22:33 AM
"Transparent"
What makes GlassRat "transparent"?
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 10/23/2020
Russian Military Officers Unmasked, Indicted for High-Profile Cyberattack Campaigns
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  10/19/2020
Modern Day Insider Threat: Network Bugs That Are Stealing Your Data
David Pearson, Principal Threat Researcher,  10/21/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-27187
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
An issue was discovered in KDE Partition Manager 4.1.0 before 4.2.0. The kpmcore_externalcommand helper contains a logic flaw in which the service invoking D-Bus is not properly checked. An attacker on the local machine can replace /etc/fstab, and execute mount and other partitioning related command...
CVE-2020-7752
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
This affects the package systeminformation before 4.27.11. This package is vulnerable to Command Injection. The attacker can concatenate curl's parameters to overwrite Javascript files and then execute any OS commands.
CVE-2020-7127
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
A remote unauthenticated arbitrary code execution vulnerability was discovered in Aruba Airwave Software version(s): Prior to 1.3.2.
CVE-2020-7196
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
The HPE BlueData EPIC Software Platform version 4.0 and HPE Ezmeral Container Platform 5.0 use an insecure method of handling sensitive Kerberos passwords that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. Specifically, they display the kdc_admin_password in the source file of the ur...
CVE-2020-7197
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
SSMC3.7.0.0 is vulnerable to remote authentication bypass. HPE StoreServ Management Console (SSMC) 3.7.0.0 is an off node multiarray manager web application and remains isolated from data on the managed arrays. HPE has provided an update to HPE StoreServ Management Console (SSMC) software 3.7.0.0* U...