Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

8/31/2016
04:35 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

More Than 40% Of Attacks Abuse SSL Encryption

New report shows risk of not inspecting encrypted packets.

There’s an important caveat about encrypted traffic from new research released this week: Encryption works so well that hackers are using it as cover.

A new study from A10 and the Ponemon Institute found that 80% of respondents say their organizations have been the victim of a cyberattack or malicious insiders in the past year -- and 41% of the attacks have used encryption to evade detection. In addition, 75% say malware hidden within encrypted traffic is a risk to their organizations.

At issue: The report found that SSL encryption not only hides data from would-be hackers but also from common security tools.

“Hackers are using SSL encryption to slide by standard perimeter defenses,” says Chase Cunningham, director of cyber operations at A10 Networks.

Cunningham says companies need to start thinking about using technologies that can inspect SSL packets and quarantine the bad or malicious packets. He adds that it’s going to become even more important as organizations move encrypted data out to the cloud – companies need to know if all those encrypted packets out in the cloud are secure.

The three main reasons organizations don’t decrypt encrypted traffic, according to the report: lack of enabling security tools (47%), insufficient resources (45%), and performance degradation (45%). 

Another 53% of the respondents admit that their security solutions are collapsing under growing SSL bandwidth demands and key lengths.

Kevin Bocek, vice president of security strategy and threat intelligence at Venafi, says the A10 research validates what they’ve been saying for the past several months about the dangers lurking inside encrypted traffic. He points out three aspects to inspecting encrypted traffic.

First, companies must focus on key management for inbound traffic. Bocek says they need to know where the keys are and use automated tools that keep them regularly updated.

Second, companies need to set up a trusted authority for outbound traffic so when the system initiates a new connection, a new certificate is created. Bocek says most security tools have these kinds of capabilities.

Finally, the same kind of key management a company sets up for inbound traffic must be used for internal (East-West) traffic. “Basically for East-West traffic the company controls the end, whether it’s one data center to another data center or one network segment to another network segment,” he adds.

Bottom line: Security managers need to understand that encrypted packets represent a legitimate threat that must be managed and inspected regularly. 

Related Content:

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
theb0x
50%
50%
theb0x,
User Rank: Ninja
9/2/2016 | 7:53:54 PM
Re: Encryption is a double edge sword
Broken encryption algorithms can be a huge advantage in obtaining a better understanding of the metrics of the attack itself. Ssl injection and stripping can be performed to reverse engineer the attack vector to mitigate the risk.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
9/2/2016 | 10:58:32 AM
Re: Encryption is a double edge sword
Agreed but still better than no encryption at all.
theb0x
100%
0%
theb0x,
User Rank: Ninja
9/1/2016 | 9:22:25 AM
Re: Encryption is a double edge sword
SSL / TLS is still broken.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
8/31/2016 | 9:17:44 PM
Encryption is a double edge sword
The same proponents for encryption to secure data are also the same proponents to be utilized for malicious intent.
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19012
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or ...
CVE-2019-19022
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
iTerm2 through 3.3.6 has potentially insufficient documentation about the presence of search history in com.googlecode.iterm2.plist, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by searching for the NoSyncSearchHistory string in .plist files within public Git r...
CVE-2019-19035
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
jhead 3.03 is affected by: heap-based buffer over-read. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: ReadJpegSections and process_SOFn in jpgfile.c. The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.
CVE-2019-19011
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
MiniUPnP ngiflib 0.4 has a NULL pointer dereference in GifIndexToTrueColor in ngiflib.c via a file that lacks a palette.
CVE-2019-19010
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-16
Eval injection in the Math plugin of Limnoria (before 2019.11.09) and Supybot (through 2018-05-09) allows remote unprivileged attackers to disclose information or possibly have unspecified other impact via the calc and icalc IRC commands.