Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/25/2018
10:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Low-Cost Crimeware Kit Gaining Popularity in Underground Markets

At $150 for a three-month subscription, Rubella Malware Builder presents a threat to enterprises, Flashpoint says.

When it comes to malware and cybercriminals, sometimes "cheap" and "fast" clearly trumps "tested" and "sophisticated."

That's the case with Rubella Macro Builder, a recently discovered crimeware kit that, despite being new and relatively unsophisticated, has been gaining popularity among cybercriminals - including members of the suspected Russian gang behind the Panda banking malware.

Security vendor Flashpoint, which issued an advisory on the threat this week, described Rubella as enabling criminals to generate Microsoft Word (.doc) and Microsoft Excel (.xls) payloads.  "The Rubella-generated malware acts as a first-stage loader for other subsequent malware downloads and installations on targeted machines," says Vitali Kremez, director of research for Flashpoint.

Since it surfaced in February, Rubella Macro Builder has been used as a first-stage loader in one of the most recent Panda campaigns. The group behind the distribution appears to have targeted victims through various social media platforms and through webinjects, Flashpoint says.

"Flashpoint identified Rubella malware infection leading to the execution of the Panda banking malware version 2.6.6 and Gootkit banking malware," Kremez says. Panda and Gootkit are designed to harvest credentials, infect browsers through webinjects and enable remote PC access via a hidden virtual network-computing module, he says.

When it first surfaced in February, the authors of the Rubella crimeware kit priced it at a relatively low $500 per month. Since then, prices for the kit have dropped even further to just around $150 for a three-month subscription even as it has acquired several new capabilities, according to FlashPoint.

The Rubella crimeware kit currently includes support for XOR and Base64 encryption algorithms, PowerShell, Microsoft.XMLHTTP, and Bitsadmin download methods and multiple payload execution options including Visual Basic Script and JavaScript.

Rubella Macro Builder does not exploit any security vulnerabilities. Rather, it relies on social engineering techniques to force victims to enable malicious macro execution to run it, Kremez says. It is typically distributed to intended victims via Microsoft Word or Excel email attachments during spam campaigns. It comes with some rudimentary but nevertheless effective obfuscation methods for bypassing basic AV tools.

"The macro builder has a clear appeal for cybercriminals: it’s cheap, fast, and can defeat basic static anti-virus detection," Kremez says.

Rubella is somewhat similar to ThreadKit, a more advanced malware kit that researchers at Proofpoint discovered last October and described in an alert in March. ThreadKit, like Rubella is a Microsoft Office document exploit builder, but packs more features, including a mechanism for reporting infection statistics back to the operators of the malware.

ThreadKit has been used quite extensively to spread numerous malware payloads including Trickbot and remote access Trojans like Loki Bot and FormBook. One well-known crime group that has been using the kit is the Cobalt Gang, a threat actor associated with various ATM heists.

"Microsoft Office macro-based malware appears to still be threat actors' preferred method for obtaining initial access to compromised machines," Flashpoint said in its advisory. Microsoft Office-based loader malware like Rubella work well as an intial decoy because they look like commonly exchanged Word and Excel documents and attachments.

According to the security vendor, Rubella Macro Builder represents a moderate threat for enterpises given its ability to beat static AV tools and its low pricing model. To mitigate their exposure to the threat, organizations should pay attention to email messages with suspicious Word or Excel attachments, especially those that ask permission to 'Enable Content' for running macros, FlashPoint said.

Related Content:

Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for an intensive Security Pro Summit at Interop ITX and learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the agenda here.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
johnwicked
50%
50%
johnwicked,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/26/2018 | 1:53:12 PM
Rubella
Why do you have to say it is not properly tested? I put a lot of time coding this tool, so atleast have the decency to elaborate on such claims. :-(

It might not be sophisticated. But it does bypass protection on both scantime and runtime and works properly. I do not see the issue with it being not sophistcated as long as it works properly. Better to have something usual and working instead of something flashy and non-functional in the pentesting industry, right?

I wish you a nice day, keep following your passion in the security industry.
Florida Town Pays $600K to Ransomware Operators
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/20/2019
Pledges to Not Pay Ransomware Hit Reality
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  6/21/2019
AWS CISO Talks Risk Reduction, Development, Recruitment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/25/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-1619
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary actions with administrative privileges on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper session ...
CVE-2019-1620
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary files on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect permission settings in affected DCNM software. An attacker could ex...
CVE-2019-1621
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to sensitive files on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect permissions settings on affected DCNM software. An attacker...
CVE-2019-1622
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive information from an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper access controls for certain URLs on affected DCNM software...
CVE-2019-10133
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-26
A flaw was found in Moodle before 3.7, 3.6.4, 3.5.6, 3.4.9 and 3.1.18. The form to upload cohorts contained a redirect field, which was not restricted to internal URLs.