Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/25/2018
10:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Low-Cost Crimeware Kit Gaining Popularity in Underground Markets

At $150 for a three-month subscription, Rubella Malware Builder presents a threat to enterprises, Flashpoint says.

When it comes to malware and cybercriminals, sometimes "cheap" and "fast" clearly trumps "tested" and "sophisticated."

That's the case with Rubella Macro Builder, a recently discovered crimeware kit that, despite being new and relatively unsophisticated, has been gaining popularity among cybercriminals - including members of the suspected Russian gang behind the Panda banking malware.

Security vendor Flashpoint, which issued an advisory on the threat this week, described Rubella as enabling criminals to generate Microsoft Word (.doc) and Microsoft Excel (.xls) payloads.  "The Rubella-generated malware acts as a first-stage loader for other subsequent malware downloads and installations on targeted machines," says Vitali Kremez, director of research for Flashpoint.

Since it surfaced in February, Rubella Macro Builder has been used as a first-stage loader in one of the most recent Panda campaigns. The group behind the distribution appears to have targeted victims through various social media platforms and through webinjects, Flashpoint says.

"Flashpoint identified Rubella malware infection leading to the execution of the Panda banking malware version 2.6.6 and Gootkit banking malware," Kremez says. Panda and Gootkit are designed to harvest credentials, infect browsers through webinjects and enable remote PC access via a hidden virtual network-computing module, he says.

When it first surfaced in February, the authors of the Rubella crimeware kit priced it at a relatively low $500 per month. Since then, prices for the kit have dropped even further to just around $150 for a three-month subscription even as it has acquired several new capabilities, according to FlashPoint.

The Rubella crimeware kit currently includes support for XOR and Base64 encryption algorithms, PowerShell, Microsoft.XMLHTTP, and Bitsadmin download methods and multiple payload execution options including Visual Basic Script and JavaScript.

Rubella Macro Builder does not exploit any security vulnerabilities. Rather, it relies on social engineering techniques to force victims to enable malicious macro execution to run it, Kremez says. It is typically distributed to intended victims via Microsoft Word or Excel email attachments during spam campaigns. It comes with some rudimentary but nevertheless effective obfuscation methods for bypassing basic AV tools.

"The macro builder has a clear appeal for cybercriminals: it’s cheap, fast, and can defeat basic static anti-virus detection," Kremez says.

Rubella is somewhat similar to ThreadKit, a more advanced malware kit that researchers at Proofpoint discovered last October and described in an alert in March. ThreadKit, like Rubella is a Microsoft Office document exploit builder, but packs more features, including a mechanism for reporting infection statistics back to the operators of the malware.

ThreadKit has been used quite extensively to spread numerous malware payloads including Trickbot and remote access Trojans like Loki Bot and FormBook. One well-known crime group that has been using the kit is the Cobalt Gang, a threat actor associated with various ATM heists.

"Microsoft Office macro-based malware appears to still be threat actors' preferred method for obtaining initial access to compromised machines," Flashpoint said in its advisory. Microsoft Office-based loader malware like Rubella work well as an intial decoy because they look like commonly exchanged Word and Excel documents and attachments.

According to the security vendor, Rubella Macro Builder represents a moderate threat for enterpises given its ability to beat static AV tools and its low pricing model. To mitigate their exposure to the threat, organizations should pay attention to email messages with suspicious Word or Excel attachments, especially those that ask permission to 'Enable Content' for running macros, FlashPoint said.

Related Content:

Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for an intensive Security Pro Summit at Interop ITX and learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the agenda here.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
johnwicked
50%
50%
johnwicked,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/26/2018 | 1:53:12 PM
Rubella
Why do you have to say it is not properly tested? I put a lot of time coding this tool, so atleast have the decency to elaborate on such claims. :-(

It might not be sophisticated. But it does bypass protection on both scantime and runtime and works properly. I do not see the issue with it being not sophistcated as long as it works properly. Better to have something usual and working instead of something flashy and non-functional in the pentesting industry, right?

I wish you a nice day, keep following your passion in the security industry.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...