Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

1/24/2007
07:35 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Intrusic Shuttered

Internal threat detection firm undone by complicated technology, competition

Intrusic -- an insider threat detection vendor -- has closed its doors, a company executive confirmed today.

CEO James Mobley, who joined Intrusic a few months ago, says the decision to cease operations was made early last week, and its remaining 20 employees "have begun looking for other opportunities."

Rumors had been circulating that Intrusic was winding down its operations after failing to gain a foothold in the crowded market for insider threat detection software. Mobley acknowledges the market is crowded, but adds there's plenty of room for competitors if they are positioned properly.

"The decision was made based on a combination of things," Mobley says. Intrusic looked at market opportunity, and the investment required to take advantage of it, he says, and then decided to end its operations. He says the company is still working out customer support issues and is approaching several companies about the sale of its intellectual property.

He says the insider threat space is a healthy market, and that "no one vendor is solving it in an end-to-end fashion."

After Mobley joined Intrusic, the company raised $8 million in Series B funding from existing investors North Bridge Venture Partners, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, and DFJ New England, bringing the total venture capital funding to $19 million, says Nick Selby, senior analyst with The 451 Group, which estimates the privately held Intrusic's revenues at less than $800,000 for 2005.

"It was one of those situations where you have to look at it and gauge the situation and make the best decision based on where you are," Mobley says of Intrusic's demise.

One analyst who requested anonymity says the insider threat detection market is problematic. "Nobody has a product in this space that doesn't require multiple full-time staff," the analyst says. "And nobody budgets even a single full-time person to a new, unproven security product."

The 451 Group's Selby says the insider threat market itself wasn't the problem. "We don't think Intrusic's decision is necessarily indicative of a lack of interest in these kinds of technologies, but rather of some unfortunate decisions at the company over the past couple of years," says 451 Group's Selby. Among its woes were "conflicting statements" about how its product worked and its features, he says.

Other vendors in the sector have also had difficulties. Seattle-based GraniteEdge announced layoffs and a revamp last summer, and New York City-based CounterStorm restructured in 2004, he says. Other vendors in this market include Securify, PacketMotion, and network behavior anomaly detection players like Arbor Networks, Lancope, and Mazu Networks, Selby adds.

He lauded Mobley's no-nonsense approach to communicating the company's strengths and openness about its weaknesses, and credited him with the introduction of Intrusic's consulting services.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • The 451 Group
  • Arbor Networks Inc.
  • CounterStorm Inc.
  • GraniteEdge Networks Inc.
  • Intrusic Inc.
  • Lancope Inc.
  • Mazu Networks
  • PacketMotion Inc.
  • Securify Inc. Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
    Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
    Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
    Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
    In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
    Flash Poll
    The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
    The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
    This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-17475
    PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
    Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
    CVE-2020-0255
    PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
    ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
    CVE-2020-14353
    PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
    ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
    CVE-2020-17464
    PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
    ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
    CVE-2020-17473
    PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
    Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.