Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

09:55 AM
Connect Directly

iDefense Revamps Bucks for Bugs Contest

Changes aimed at making vulnerability research 'sexy' again, iDefense says

iDefense has revamped its vulnerability contest in an effort to raise the bar for researchers who compete in the cash for zero-day exploits program: it will no longer offer its separate quarterly vulnerability submission challenge, but will instead annually reward the best of the bugs it accepts through its Vulnerability Contributor Program.

“We want to bring 'sexy' back to vulnerability research,” says Rick Howard, intelligence director for iDefense Labs. “Two to three years ago, these kinds of programs were very sexy to the security community, paying hackers to find exploits in common apps… but the focus of what is sexy has changed from finding vulnerabilities to what the malicious code is doing. That’s where the action is.”

So instead of accepting entries for your basic denial-of-service bug like it used to do, iDefense is now looking for exploits that demonstrate real, specific things the bug can do to an application, such as how exploit code could control or alter the Outlook client when it launches, for example, Howard says.

iDefense’s quarterly VCP Challenge was an add-on to its regular Vulnerability Contributor Program, and it ended up being the same more seasoned hackers winning over and over from the VCP program, according to Howard. “And our own contributors complained a bit that 90 days was not enough time to do a” quality exploit, he says. “The [contest] became unmanageable.”

Buying vulnerabilities from researchers has been a controversial practice, and only a few vendors do so today aside from iDefense, including TippingPoint through its Zero Day Initiative and Immunity Inc. WabiSabiLabi offers an online auction site for researchers to sell their vulnerabilities.

Howard says the growing black market for vulnerability research hasn’t had much of an impact on iDefense’s program because it’s a different clientele. “We don’t see them because we don’t pay enough” for them, he says.

iDefense’s new annual contest will reward what it considers the most significant contributions it has received over the year. The grand prize is $50,000, followed by a $25,000 first prize; a $10,000 second prize; and a $5,000 third prize. Howard says the company is investing about the same amount of cash in the new annual prize that it did with the quarterly ones.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • TippingPoint Technologies Inc.
  • Immunity Inc. Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
    Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
    DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
    Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
    Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
    Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Cartoon Contest
    Current Issue
    Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
    In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
    Flash Poll
    Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
    Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
    Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
    An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or ...
    PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
    iTerm2 through 3.3.6 has potentially insufficient documentation about the presence of search history in com.googlecode.iterm2.plist, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by searching for the NoSyncSearchHistory string in .plist files within public Git r...
    PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
    jhead 3.03 is affected by: heap-based buffer over-read. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: ReadJpegSections and process_SOFn in jpgfile.c. The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.
    PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
    MiniUPnP ngiflib 0.4 has a NULL pointer dereference in GifIndexToTrueColor in ngiflib.c via a file that lacks a palette.
    PUBLISHED: 2019-11-16
    Eval injection in the Math plugin of Limnoria (before 2019.11.09) and Supybot (through 2018-05-09) allows remote unprivileged attackers to disclose information or possibly have unspecified other impact via the calc and icalc IRC commands.