Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

How 'Postcript' Exploits Networked Printers

At Black Hat 2017, a university researcher will demo how attackers can drill into networked printers by way of the ubiquitous PostScript programming language.

Network printer exploits are like old dogs learning new tricks, according to a security researcher with Ruhr University.

In his upcoming Black Hat presentation, Exploiting Network Printers, Jens Muller, Ruhr University chair for network and data security will delve into an analysis of printer attacks, in which he discovered 20 printer models were all vulnerable to at least one of the same attacks that he tested. Muller will also disclose unusual ways the Internet is enabling network printer attacks via advanced cross-site printing techniques.

The vulnerability, Muller says, stems from the 35-year-old PostScript programming language, which has connected printers to end-users for decades, even as technology evolved from the parallel printer cable, to the USB stick, to networked printers, and today to the cloud.

"Before, printers used parallel cables and having PostScript wasn't a problem." Muller says. "But now, the printer manufacturers are still using PostScript and they can easily be exploited remotely."

PostScript: An Industry Standard 

The PostScript programming language is an industry standard for network printers and its use is ubiquitous. But despite attackers ability to exploit this language, printer manufacturers have largely looked the other way, he says. Instead, manufacturers put the onus on network administrators to place the printers inside the network, where the devices are presumed to be protected from outside threats.

Even today, he notes, manufacturers do not seem to realize that attackers can drill into networked printers by way of the Internet.

On the networking side, network administrators tend to view their connected printers as nothing more than a printing device, as opposed to a potential vector of attack, he says, noting that the end result is that network admins may not think it's important to secure network printers.

Some of the attacks Muller has tested include a denial of service attack that damaged eight of the 20 printers he was testing. One new issue to emerge is the ability to set a printer back to its factory defaults by taking control of the printer remotely. Other printer attacks range from stealing print jobs containing sensitive information to pilfering system files.

Work Arounds

One potential solution to the problem, Muller says, is to corral all the connected printers and put them on a separate network with a print server. The downside: it would require a network administrator to oversee two networks, which, he says, could be difficult for midsized companies and result in the additional costs of installing and monitoring a second firewall.

"What CISOs should really do is ask themselves do they really need a device connected," Muller says. "It may make sense not to connect the printer to the cloud."

Related Content:

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
Google Lets iPhone Users Turn Device into Security Key
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/15/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-16270
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
Samsung Galaxy Gear series before build RE2 includes the hcidump utility with no privilege or permission restriction. This allows an unprivileged process to dump Bluetooth HCI packets to an arbitrary file path.
CVE-2018-16271
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
The wemail_consumer_service (from the built-in application wemail) in Samsung Galaxy Gear series allows an unprivileged process to manipulate a user's mailbox, due to improper D-Bus security policy configurations. An arbitrary email can also be sent from the mailbox via the paired smartphone. This a...
CVE-2018-16272
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
The wpa_supplicant system service in Samsung Galaxy Gear series allows an unprivileged process to fully control the Wi-Fi interface, due to the lack of its D-Bus security policy configurations. This affects Tizen-based firmwares including Samsung Galaxy Gear series before build RE2.
CVE-2019-10780
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
BibTeX-ruby before 5.1.0 allows shell command injection due to unsanitized user input being passed directly to the built-in Ruby Kernel.open method through BibTeX.open.
CVE-2019-10781
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
In schema-inspector before 1.6.9, a maliciously crafted JavaScript object can bypass the `sanitize()` and the `validate()` function used within schema-inspector.