Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

6/22/2017
06:05 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'GhostHook' Foils Windows 10 64-bit's Kernel Protection

Microsoft says an attacker needs kernel-level access before they can use the 'GhostHook' technique to install a rootkit.

Microsoft's PatchGuard kernel patch protection technology has played a big part in preventing attackers from installing rootkits on systems running Windows 10 64-bit; at least so far. But now, security researchers from CyberArk Labs say they have found a way to bypass PatchGuard protections and gain rootkit abilities on systems running Windows x64 operating systems.

The technique, which the researchers have dubbed GhostHook, involves a weakness in Microsoft’s implementation of Intel Processor Trace (Intel PT), a technology used primarily for performance monitoring, malware analysis, fuzzing, debugging, and exploit detection.

The weakness exists specifically at the point where Intel PT talks to Windows, says CyberArk researcher Kasif Dekel. It gives threat actors a way to "hook" or intercept any piece of code running on the machine and gain control over the way it behaves.

Hooking is neither an exploit technique nor an escalation of privilege approach, Dekel noted separately in a blog. Many software products, including application security tools, system utilities, and software extensions, incorporate the technique. When used in a malicious context, hooking allows threat actors to, among other things, plant rootkits on systems where the attacker already has control over the asset.

GhostHook is the first known technique that gives attackers the ability to use hooking to gain complete control over 64-bit Windows systems at the kernel level. It gives attackers a way to gain access to a Windows system in a manner that is virtually undetectable by anti-malware tools, host intrusion prevention systems, personal firewalls, next-gen endpoint products and any tool that relies on information from the kernel.

Microsoft did not immediately respond to a Dark Reading request for comment on CyberArk's discovery, or of its claims about being able to gain complete kernel-level access on 64-bit Windows systems.

But in a response to CyberArk—which Dekel included in his alert—a member of Microsoft's engineering team said the company's analysis showed that attackers would already need to be running kernel code on the system in order to be able to use GhostHook. 

"As such, this doesn’t meet the bar for servicing in a security update however it may be addressed in a future version of Windows. As such I’ve closed this case," the engineer's response noted.

Dekel though says that the attacker only needs to gain local admin rights on a machine to exploit the technique. "Gaining this level of access is table stakes for attackers, typically accomplished through simple phishing emails," he says. "This technique is about moving beyond admin rights and exploiting the machine at the kernel level. Attackers would be able to gain full control over the network and gain the ability to intercept anything on a system." GhostHook allows attackers to bypass security layers that were specifically designed to combat malware with administrative rights on a system, he says.

For the moment at least there is no evidence that the technique is being actively used to attacks Windows 10 systems. But the skills needed to pull an attack off using the GhostHook technique is well within the capabilities of nation-state actors, especially those who have already proven the ability to craft 64-bit malware like the disk erasing Shamoon.

"We believe that if attackers were able to execute ransomware through this technique, the results would be devastating," Dekel said. "Today’s ransomware works in user mode because of PatchGuard. If they were able to execute this code behind PatchGuard, it would [have a] catastrophic effect."

Mitigating the threat will require Microsoft to implement fixes in several places in the Intel PT feature. The company will also need to add PatchGuard protection to Intel's PT module, says Dekel.

"Third-party players should take in consideration that information coming from kernel modules are not always reliable," Dekel says. "They should gather the same information from various APIs and different locations in order to verify the integrity of it."

Black Hat USA returns to the fabulous Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas, Nevada, July 22-27, 2017. Click for information on the conference schedule and to register.

Related content:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How Attackers Infiltrate the Supply Chain & What to Do About It
Shay Nahari, Head of Red-Team Services at CyberArk,  7/16/2019
US Mayors Commit to Just Saying No to Ransomware
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/16/2019
The Problem with Proprietary Testing: NSS Labs vs. CrowdStrike
Brian Monkman, Executive Director at NetSecOPEN,  7/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12551
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
In SweetScape 010 Editor 9.0.1, improper validation of arguments in the internal implementation of the Memcpy function (provided by the scripting engine) allows an attacker to overwrite arbitrary memory, which could lead to code execution.
CVE-2019-12552
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
In SweetScape 010 Editor 9.0.1, an integer overflow during the initialization of variables could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service.
CVE-2019-3414
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
All versions up to V1.19.20.02 of ZTE OTCP product are impacted by XSS vulnerability. Due to XSS, when an attacker invokes the security management to obtain the resources of the specified operation code owned by a user, the malicious script code could be transmitted in the parameter. If the front en...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
tcpdump.org tcpdump 4.9.2 is affected by: CWE-126: Buffer Over-read. The impact is: May expose Saved Frame Pointer, Return Address etc. on stack. The component is: line 234: "ND_PRINT((ndo, "%s", buf));", in function named "print_prefix", in "print-hncp.c". Th...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
aubio 0.4.8 and earlier is affected by: null pointer. The impact is: crash. The component is: filterbank. The attack vector is: pass invalid arguments to new_aubio_filterbank. The fixed version is: after commit eda95c9c22b4f0b466ae94c4708765eaae6e709e.